one more time!!!
![]()



#15 CB #153 OVR (93 Rating)


#11 CB #111 OVR (5.9 Rating)


#10 ATH #154 OVR (82 Rating)


#9 CB


#9 CB #104 OVR (.9515 Rating)Does anyone remember which thread it is that shows how to embed? If anyone could assist me on how to do this I would greatly appreciate it. I do not know why but it is one of the great mysteries of the world to me lol.
I dont, we got to the Title game without em and I would rather ND get majority of the good kids.
Oh, and ALL OF THE OHIO RECRUITS!
Two corners from Ohio, with one from PA hopefully!
If you haven't watched this kids tape, do yourself the pleasure. Phenomenal athlete gentlemen.
I watched his two camp vids that gave sparq ratings, but wheres his other vids?
And then enjoy your constant 43-14 beat downs.
If Crawford was still committed to scUM, I feel like we would be saying we dodged a bullet due to his deplorable behavior.
Not picking on you Lax, but as I read that, it came across as justifying one bad incident over another. I'm all for taking Crawford if the staff wants him. That tells me they looked into this and are satisfied with what they heard from all parties.
What he did is wrong and his follow up actions were as well.
Sure, there are people who hate Michigan and would paint it in the most negative light, whereas they'd paint it in the best possible light if he was an ND guy.
But that's really not at all my case here. I'm being fairly consistent. Just like how I wanted Starks last year, and thought UCLA was smart to take him... I want Crawford this year, and think anyone would be smart to take him. It's a simple question of risk/reward and whether the incident is indicative of a larger mental/character/attitude issue. I think the reward outweighs risk, and from the specifics I've heard of the incident I don't think it's representative of larger issues below the surface.
Right, dealing in moral absolutes what he did was wrong. I just simply do not think it was a big deal.
IMO, hitting a teacher/cop/woman is very different than getting into a fight with a peer. I think the vast majority of the people on this board threw down a time or two in HS. And the "theft" is certainly no more egregious than the Jameis Winston crab legs which people literally laughed about. To me this is all smallish potatoes. It's not like he mugged someone and stole their wallet... and I was just trying to express that, to me, the connotation of "assault" and "theft" was sensationalizing a relatively minor (but definitely wrong) transgression.
God the scUM boards are freaking hilarious. "We don't need 5'8" corners." "Good thing he's going to ND, he wouldn't have seen the field with our DB haul." "No one else wanted him anymore, his frame is too small for our style."
God the scUM boards are freaking hilarious. "We don't need 5'8" corners." "Good thing he's going to ND, he wouldn't have seen the field with our DB haul." "No one else wanted him anymore, his frame is too small for our style."
Doesn't sound like us at all...
I generally tend to agree we can get like that, but I think the majority of minds have been pretty rational with regard to our big decommit and openly admit they would take him back instantly.
No way Jose. Barnett is gonna suuuuuuuuuuck. He's obviously indecisive, and his mobility actually isn't all that impressive. And his arm strength? It's practically a mirage.