See, instead of getting into a pissing match about semantics, the real conversation is, will this just be another whitewash of reprehensible behavior of those with the power, privlige, or wealth to be in leadership roles. If there is no teaching moment from this if another asshat who thinks and feels the same way is allowed to reward him incredibly well, and take over, business as usual, we all will have lost. Like the Irish of past, often African-Americans are prized as soldiers, slaves, athletes, and otherwise relegated to menial jobs, and substandard living environments. Not the gifted few, that can be so exploited that they can reach rewards far past what is average and expected, but those with no special skill or talent. A) Is one group compensated equivalently for their performance, and represented in a broad range of occupations(?), and B) when you talk about watershed events in equality, are you talking about the majority of a group, or an elite few, and are the less successful members needs being advanced as well as the more successful member's needs?
