wizards8507
Well-known member
- Messages
- 20,660
- Reaction score
- 2,661
reality is, that is reserved for "angry white guys" in the pan handle of Idaho and remote parts of Montana. It would be too awkward for the press and sheeple to deal with the expansion of the terminology to its full meaning. But I agree with the categorization of what gang bangers are doing...
Frankly I don't care what label they put on these guys...and as far as I'm concerned they've declared war on humanity...so I'm just fine with lifetime confinement on the "Rock" or Gitmo...wanna gang bang?...cool, then face military special forces responses, with military justice. See if that sh!t doesn't calm it right down...
First paragraph - agree 100%
Second paragraph - not so much. The problem with giving the government that kind of power is that eventually a guy you don't like will be the one weilding it. So-called "conservatives" loved the Patriot Act but then freaked the hell out over the NSA surveilance programs. Liberals want to bomb the hell out of Syria but were outraged when Bush went to war without congressional approval. I don't want the military marching on American citizens now matter how guilty they are, because someday I might be the one deemed "guilty" for my affiliation with a certain group or political philosophy. We could go a long way by enforcing the laws that are already on the books and closing some of the loopholes that allow defense attorneys to let the guilty run free on technicalities.