You apparently don't even know how to comprehend posts. Maybe I will have to type in all caps since you seem to struggle comprehending posts.
NONE OF US KNOW IF HE, HIMSELF, TWEETED THAT. UNLESS YOU WERE THERE AND WITNESSED HIM DOING SO, OR AN INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED AND PROVED, WITHOUT A REASONABLE DOUBT, THAT HE, D.J. FLUKER, TWEETED THAT. YOU STATE THAT THERE'S NO CHANCE IT WAS NOT HIM.
THE POINT OF MY POST: THE MANTI TE'O SITUATION, WHICH WAS ONE OF THE CRAZIEST IN A LONG TIME, GAVE THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF PEOPLE THE IMPRESSION THAT HE WAS A HUGE LIAR. WHY? BECAUSE PEOPLE MADE IDIOTIC CLAIMS ABOUT HOW HE CONDUCTED THE WHOLE THING WITHOUT KNOWING THE FACTS.
WHAT MY POINT WAS, IS THAT WE CANNOT MANDATE SOMETHING ABOUT HOW THERE'S NO WAY THAT SOMEONE WAS INNOCENT OR GUILTY OF SOMETHING UNLESS WE KNOW ALL THE FACTS. I NEVER SAID THAT MANTI WAS THE REASON. I SAID THAT, LOOKING AT THAT SITUATION, WHERE HARDLY ANYONE BELIEVED HE WAS INNOCENT, WHICH IS SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THIS SITUATION, WHERE THE MAJORITY BELIEVE FLUKER IS GUILTY.
Wow, a student at Bama can actually comprehend posts and state objective opinions using facts. Albeit a kid who came to Bama from Massachusetts, which has arguably one of the best education systems (yes, including High School) in the country, but still. I also took the liberty of bolding key parts, just in case you miss it.
To that other poster, where did I say that this situation was equal to the U.S. Government in terms of hacker appeal? Please show me. I suggest you re-read my post again.