CanadianIrish
New member
- Messages
- 617
- Reaction score
- 26
First I like your PM saying you didn't want to debate directly after you started debating my comments.
Do you need more? I can cite several multiple shootings where fewer were killed than injured. Do you also know about the worse massacre in our country's history involving a school? 1927. Man used home made bombs to kill 54. Nearly a hundred years ago and he didn't use guns.
Is anything being done for your country's alcohol related injuries/deaths? Plenty of people will accept those numbers but never think twice about banning alcohol.
People should be realistic. The crazies that do these attacks are aiming for places that do not have guns. If guns are the problem, why aren't more people in gun stores murdered? Nearly 100% of people in gun stores own guns. Because there are so many guns we are to assume that there would be a lot of murder too correct?
I didn't PM you anything. Your comments make no sense at all, frankly it's impossible to "debate" with people whose minds are so closed as to think that guns don't increase the likelihood for violence.
What you're proposing is a return to wild west style justice, a sort of mutually assured destruction on a personal level. It doesn't work, and it creates a culture of violence in the aim of self defence.
The United States has more guns than any other civilized country, and more murders. If guns don't kill people but rather people kill people, does that just mean the US is more ****ed up than any other civilized country in the world?