B
Bogtrotter07
Guest
I find this exciting, because there are more and more signs occuring to me that my believe in Archetypal Psychology is right on track.
This sort of notion, holds that a persons character is their character, because of these more important and spiritual forces, in otherwords, a revealing of character, and personality, as opposted to a changing or shaping . . . See?
Archetypal psychology is a polytheistic psychology, in that it attempts to recognize the myriad fantasies and myths that shape and are shaped by our psychological lives. The ego is but one psychological fantasy within an assemblage of fantasies. To illustrate the multiple personifications of psyche Hillman made reference to gods, goddesses, demingods and other imaginal figures which he referred to as sounding boards "for echoing life today or as bass chords giving resonance to the little melodies of daily life" although he insisted that these figures should not be used as a 'master matrix' against which we should measure today and thereby decry modern loss of richness. Archetypal psychology is part of the Jungian psychology tradition and related to Jung's original Analytical psychology but is also a radical departure from it in some respects.
Whereas Jung’s psychology focused on the Self, its dynamics and its constellations (ego, anima, animus, shadow), Hillman’s Archetypal psychology relativizes and deliteralizes the ego and focuses on psyche, or soul, and the archai, the deepest patterns of psychic functioning, "the fundamental fantasies that animate all life"
This sort of notion, holds that a persons character is their character, because of these more important and spiritual forces, in otherwords, a revealing of character, and personality, as opposted to a changing or shaping . . . See?