Problem with concealed carry is you have to abide by the laws, so you are not armed near public gathering places, bars, schools, etc. Just where some sociopathic moron would attack.
Are there restrictions on being armed in Ohio movie theaters? I'll definitely be carrying when I see TDR tonight.
Not sure I agree with the earlier assertion that an armed spectator wouldn't have made a difference, but there are simply too many variables involved to bother arguing about it. Commercially available body armor is notoriously unreliable, though.
I'm curious about the tear gas he used. Are such things available to the American public? My cursory research didn't provide an answer.
Why is it always a terrorist is military or Muslim? It's bullshit that both are stereotyped as the standard terrorists. This guy was a PhD student. I wonder, will stressed out PhD students be randomly screened by the TSA and met with social stigma? It's bullshit that all the speculation when this broke was that it was a military person.
Wooly, c'mon man. Trained killer comment isn't that apt now that we know he was just a PhD student. I'm disappointed you pegged a military guy for this before knowing what happened. Colorado Batman Movie Shooting Suspect Was PhD Student - Yahoo!
This highlights absolutely why the right to bear arms is necessary. If someone had a gun in the theater they could have returned fire. It was tear gas to immobilize the crowd. Hard to return fire in that I know. It really ****ing sucks being CS gassed. Criminals and psychopaths will get guns one way or another, they aren't abiding by the laws to begin with. Don't infringe on my right to protect my family from scenarios because some people are crazy. You can make a ****ing bomb and kill just as many people with household items, are we going to ban all of them?
It's absolutely terrible for all of these people and families involved; my heart goes out to them. I wish we had more exotic means of punishment in our judicial system.
"Trained Killer" was probably poor wording, and I didn't mean it as a deragotory statement for our servicemen. I just meant it by his true meaning, that he seemed to know how do to this in a manner where it looked like he was trained. That's all. Plus, the guy lives in a part of town were there is a lot of military people living.
I disagree with the returning fire comment though. He spread tear gas and the crowd was in an absolute panic. He was running through the people and any shots by somebody "playing hero" would have been through tear gas, at a moving target, surrounded by innocent people and it all probably would have been meaningless because the guy was wearing body armor. More people would have been put in harms way, because instead of their being one shooter, there would be a gun fight.
I disagree with the returning fire comment though. He spread tear gas and the crowd was in an absolute panic. He was running through the people and any shots by somebody "playing hero" would have been through tear gas, at a moving target, surrounded by innocent people and it all probably would have been meaningless because the guy was wearing body armor. More people would have been put in harms way, because instead of their being one shooter, there would be a gun fight.
Anyone with a CCP should be trained in the use of the firearm they are carrying. In your opinion more people would have been in harms way. In my opinion, a CCP holder with proper knowledge of a firearm could have saved the lives of 12 innocent men,women and children.
The only person standing in this situation would have been the gunman. There have been numerous reports that when the shooting started, people hit the decks or ran for the exit and the gunman simply walked the aisle way and shot people to death. A bullet to the chest even while wearing protective gear could have potentially stopped the gunman and certainly slowed him down.
My stance is it is your responsiblity to tackle this guy if you are within ten feet of him. kind of like sitting next to the emergency exits on a plane. guess i could not blame someone for not doing so
Perhaps not in this situation, I won't split hairs on that, but it would be better than not having one when I need it.
It depends on how good a shoot you are and what you are carrying. Granted wearing what he was and decked out how he was it wouldn't help. Even knowing that me carrying if i can't kill or stop him at least i can allow him down or distract him long enough to let people get out. Also above you mentioned he had an automatic rifle. The news around here are saying that it is a semi automatic rifle. Are you for sure it was auto?
James Holmes used 3 different kinds of guns during his assault on a Colorado movie theater ... including a high power assault rifle.
The Aurora PD says Holmes was in possession of an AR-15, a Remington 870 shotgun and a 40 caliber glock handgun when he was arrested this morning.
Cops say they found another 40 caliber glock in the shooter's car, located right outside the movie theater.
An AR-15 is a semi-automatic weapon ... capable of firing off hundreds of rounds per minute.
Ok, you sit hoping that no one has another gun if you are ever in a situation such as this.
Personally, give me 10 people with guns to shoot this bastard down.
We are more thoroughly controlled by our society's norms than we tend to imagine. In a setting of peace, outside the context of war, to perpetrate an act like the Aurora massacre requires an almost superhuman feat of volition. There aren't more Aurora's because we are sociable robots, programmed for peace. To override that programming and act really monstrously requires both an uncommon estrangement and an implausibly free will.
Well looks like Fred Phelps has expressed his opinion. The Westboro Church plans to picket the Aurora shooting memorial service - National Places & Faces | Examiner.com
Great to see the right wing conservatives in action.
Well looks like Fred Phelps has expressed his opinion. The Westboro Church plans to picket the Aurora shooting memorial service - National Places & Faces | Examiner.com