Who do you want to replace Brian Kelly?

beryirish

Dry Land Is Not A Myth!
Messages
5,949
Reaction score
539
Is Sanford even on the radar as a possible replacement --- or is he still too green?
 

Irishize

Well-known member
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
461
True, but take away this year he has done WAAAAY better than Fleck (who is an 8-5 coach with one good year) over the last 4 years. And look at everyone on Flecks nutties, BK may have worn out his welcome at ND, but I have no doubt in my mind he can still win a lot of football games. Nobody plays D in the Pac and he can recruit anyone he wants to play for him. He would be a great hire for them.

IMO, that'd be a PR nightmare for Oregon. Firing a 4-8 coach that is universally respected and an all-around good guy. Hiring a 4-8 coach that is just the opposite and lampooned for it. If that happened, I think Oregon would soon be hiring a new AD. Plus, Kelly would be at Petrino-level when it comes to credibility.

I get your point as far as scheme and lack of D...but PR-wise...ugh.
 

Irishize

Well-known member
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
461
he's not on the radar for any jobs after this past season i'd say. He was a hot property last year, not now.

Bruce Feldman: Curious to see if Jim Mora and #UCLA make a run at #NotreDame's Mike Sanford to become Bruins new OC.
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,344
Reaction score
13,103
Bruce Feldman: Curious to see if Jim Mora and #UCLA make a run at #NotreDame's Mike Sanford to become Bruins new OC.

HC jobs I should have said. He might get a look/interviews for OC gigs on the west coast alright.
 

beryirish

Dry Land Is Not A Myth!
Messages
5,949
Reaction score
539
If there is a coaching change - my biggest request is to retain HH and that HH wants to stay. Everyone else, i'm ok with if they don't come back. Not saying i don't like them, I just think HH is a guy that recruits flock to for the most part.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
Even if he believes he has "zero culpability" you at least sack up and say "Hey, we realized that we didn't emphasize academics enough for some of the players and we've taken steps to make sure they all feel comfortable with their academic workload. It's not easy being an ND football player, so the coaching staff is going to up our support of the academic programs so our players get a top notch education and football experience."

I don't know how the question was put to him, about his culpability in the scandal, only that his answer was, "Zero. None." Without knowing the wording of the question, it's hard for me to say how appropriate his answer was.
 

Rack Em

Community Bod
Messages
7,089
Reaction score
2,727
I don't know how the question was put to him, about his culpability in the scandal, only that his answer was, "Zero. None." Without knowing the wording of the question, it's hard for me to say how appropriate his answer was.

Does it really matter? The optics are terrible with that answer either way. Kelly went from being an annoying politician behind the podium to giving zero fucks up there.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
Does it really matter? The optics are terrible with that answer either way. Kelly went from being an annoying politician behind the podium to giving zero fucks up there.

Yes, it matters. If the reporter says to Kelly, "You know, Coach, there's speculation that your culpability in this is as much as 80-90%. How much culpability do you think you have?" Then, "Zero. None." is an appropriate answer, as is the revocation of that "journalist"s credentials. Obvious troll jobs are part and parcel of the internet experience, but have no place in Notre Dame press conferences.

And it would be ESPECIALLY appropriate if the actual question asked was, "Coach, the process of investigating these matters drug on for months and months, what influence did you have on that process, to have it wrapped up a little quicker?" And then he says, "Zero. None." And I wouldn't put it past the "journalists" to then print the story that Brian Kelly denied any culpability in the scandal, using that quote WAY out of context.
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
True, but take away this year he has done WAAAAY better than Fleck (who is an 8-5 coach with one good year) over the last 4 years. And look at everyone on Flecks nutties, BK may have worn out his welcome at ND, but I have no doubt in my mind he can still win a lot of football games. Nobody plays D in the Pac and he can recruit anyone he wants to play for him. He would be a great hire for them.

To me, the more likely scenario in the Pac-10 would be Kelly to Cal if Dykes leaves for Baylor.
 

IrishBroker

New member
Messages
1,278
Reaction score
50
Jack is lending Kelly the plane to go interview at Oregon....get out from under that contract so we can hire Les Miles.

Jack then drops academic standards, and joins Big10.


I then win the lotto, become a huge booster, and they name the field "IrishBroker field"
 

arahop

Well-known member
Messages
1,601
Reaction score
615
If there is a coaching change - my biggest request is to retain HH and that HH wants to stay. Everyone else, i'm ok with if they don't come back. Not saying i don't like them, I just think HH is a guy that recruits flock to for the most part.

Just out of curiosity, all accounts have graded NDs oline graded out as under performing, I realize the players love Harry, what game since 2012 can you honsetly say. Boy our oline really pushed their D around? The zone blocking scheme isnt a great fit for an oline thats 2 deep with 4 and 5 star guys. To me HH is overvalued and the oline is super soft
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,015
Reaction score
5,055
Just out of curiosity, all accounts have graded NDs oline graded out as under performing, I realize the players love Harry, what game since 2012 can you honsetly say. Boy our oline really pushed their D around? The zone blocking scheme isnt a great fit for an oline thats 2 deep with 4 and 5 star guys. To me HH is overvalued and the oline is super soft

I think that's Kelly's offense dictating scheme. Hiestand has a reputation of a great O line coach going on for well over 20 years. If you want them to maul, Harry will get them to maul.
 

Meatloaf

Well-known member
Messages
2,058
Reaction score
951
Would that be bad? I know recruits love him but I have no idea how good he is as a DC. I didn't watch a single Oregon game in the last 2 years and don't know if they're 5-7 or 9-3.

His defense was worse than BVG's. Let that sink in.

It's 126th in the nation.
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
Would that be bad? I know recruits love him but I have no idea how good he is as a DC. I didn't watch a single Oregon game in the last 2 years and don't know if they're 5-7 or 9-3.

one of the worst defenses in ncaa this year....but he didn't have much to work with
 

beryirish

Dry Land Is Not A Myth!
Messages
5,949
Reaction score
539
Would that be bad? I know recruits love him but I have no idea how good he is as a DC. I didn't watch a single Oregon game in the last 2 years and don't know if they're 5-7 or 9-3.

Average defense ppg: 41.4 surrendered 50+ pts in 4 games.
ND: 27.8
 
Last edited:

NDRock

Well-known member
Messages
7,489
Reaction score
5,448
Would that be bad? I know recruits love him but I have no idea how good he is as a DC. I didn't watch a single Oregon game in the last 2 years and don't know if they're 5-7 or 9-3.

Well, they went 4-8 and fired their HC.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,295
Just out of curiosity, all accounts have graded NDs oline graded out as under performing, I realize the players love Harry, what game since 2012 can you honsetly say. Boy our oline really pushed their D around? The zone blocking scheme isnt a great fit for an oline thats 2 deep with 4 and 5 star guys. To me HH is overvalued and the oline is super soft

We go round and round over this. Is HH under performing because he's forced to recruit and prep a line for Kelly's O... with Kelly dictating who he's to recruit? How much autonomy does HH have in who he's bringing in? If ND hired Brett Bielema tomorrow, would HH go out and recruit 6-4, 335lb road grading guards and quit converting 4-5 star LT's to the interior?

Is the problem HH, is it HH in this system or is it HH in this system combined with Kelly's interference?
 
K

koonja

Guest
His defense was worse than BVG's. Let that sink in.

It's 126th in the nation.

one of the worst defenses in ncaa this year....but he didn't have much to work with

Average defense ppg: 41.4 surrendered 50+ pts in 4 games.
ND: 27.8

Well, they went 4-8 and fired their HC.

Thanks for the info, I truly don't pay attention to the pac 12 besides USC/Stanford. I bet we lock him up with a 10 year contract based on the above facts.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,459
Reaction score
8,544
I think that's Kelly's offense dictating scheme. Hiestand has a reputation of a great O line coach going on for well over 20 years. If you want them to maul, Harry will get them to maul.

This is exactly right. Bunch of Tennessee fans wanted HH run out of town and it was debated on message boards like many are doing now. This is a part of a quote that they believe came from former Packer OL Chad Clifton
https://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/fire-hiestand/

Dont care what anyone says. If UT runs off Harry, who are they gonna get? You people dont understand. The Head COACH and OC determines what kind of Scheme that he supposed to be teaching the OLINE. Its not the other way around. Do your research before you blame it on Harry. He doesnt call the plays, and hes not the one that wants to use a Zone blocking Scheme. Hes doing what hes told. Zone blocking is about 70% Pass blocking.

Bottom line is HH is one of the most respected OL coaches in the nation. If you want the OL to maul people, the head coach and the OC need to change the scheme
 
Top