PutuporShutup
Banned
- Messages
- 4,824
- Reaction score
- 1,909
We need to lose more players to get to 85 and land a few more in the portalI don't want to lose any of them, depth is key - not withstanding judgement against their playing ability.
We need to lose more players to get to 85 and land a few more in the portalI don't want to lose any of them, depth is key - not withstanding judgement against their playing ability.
How many big upgrades are we going to get from post-spring transfers, though?We need to lose more players to get to 85 and land a few more in the portal
Never know, but you'd at least like the opportunity if a stud comes available at a position of need.How many big upgrades are we going to get from post-spring transfers, though?
Most guys transferring at that point are leaving their current school bc the writing’s on the wall that they won’t play much. Few of those will be an improvement on the guys we already have in-house.
We still need a safety, but nothing else is urgent. And I guess at this point I’d rather develop the players we’ve got rather than let them walk in hopes of finding someone better. We’ll be below 85 regardless. Always are.
Tend to agree. The other rationale would be successful back channeling a specific target or guys who aren't meshing well with a new coach/regime.How many big upgrades are we going to get from post-spring transfers, though?
Most guys transferring at that point are leaving their current school bc the writing’s on the wall that they won’t play much. Few of those will be an improvement on the guys we already have in-house.
We still need a safety, but nothing else is urgent. And I guess at this point I’d rather develop the players we’ve got rather than let them walk in hopes of finding someone better. We’ll be below 85 regardless. Always are.
I think I saw 88 the other day. If history is any guide, I’d be pleasantly surprised if we’re at 80 by kickoff at A&M. There will be room if a stud comes available, I wouldn’t worry about that.Never know, but you'd at least like the opportunity if a stud comes available at a position of need.
I'm sure we'll be below 85 due to the names above, but we're above it right now. I believe if we take heard we're close to 90 right now.
Not recent history.I think I saw 88 the other day. If history is any guide, I’d be pleasantly surprised if we’re at 80 by kickoff at A&M. There will be room if a stud comes available, I wouldn’t worry about that.
Time to make a ND profile for Rod Heard IMO, if I'm reading tea leaves correctly on 247.
Not a captain, MF has mailed it in.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GotchaBrain fart. 110/164.
its been reported that Kiffin is happy for him lol.Is that applause or a smack at the dick?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well would we be over doing it at that point? Idk...Michigan football's former four-star WR Darrius Clemons enters transfer portal. ND recruited him and he also had a Stanford offer.
Maybe... We could be set at WR for now.Well would we be over doing it at that point? Idk...
Michigan football's former four-star WR Darrius Clemons enters transfer portal. ND recruited him and he also had a Stanford offer.