Sorry but you’re just wrong. The fact a player is a sophomore has no bearing on talent. Alt was rated out as our best OL. Would you prefer a worse player who was a senior? Should Tyree have gotten more Carrie’s than our stud sophomore running backs? The talent was there to perform better than they did. The problem with offense was the QB position and he was a Junior who your boy recruited and developed.
The fact that you have no ability to find a single fault with Rees’s coaching shows just how biased you are. First the problems with the offense were the OL then it was the WRs then it was the fact they were young. I’m convinced you and Irishdrunk are the same guy just posting opposite takes. If so, well done.
Sorry, but you're just wrong. Age doesn't necessarily have a bearing on talent, but it does come in to play with knowledge, experience, and often times execution. Alt is a tremendous talent that many missed on, some of which is due to his pedigree and the fact he got a full year as a freshman once Big Fish went down. He's more the exception to the rule because it's rare to find freshmen outperforming upperclassmen in a healthy roster, especially on the OL. The point is on good teams you'll rarely find a guy like Alt starting as a freshmen if OL development and recruiting have been going well. That speaks to the struggles under Quinn's leadership.
As far as Tyree he's an exceptional back, but running between the tackles is not his strong suit. He's very effective as a receiving threat in space, the Fiesta Bowl is a great example. In that area of the offense Tyree is better and more dangerous than both Diggs and Estime.
I would say the QB position "is what it is" but more aptly it "is what it was." Look at the difference in recruiting from BK to Freeman. Rees was on both staffs. Under BK we went after "RKGs," but since Freeman came on board Rees went after Dante Moore, and successfully landed Minchey, Carr, and Hartman. That's a pretty damn good haul in 6 months. Seems likely that the "recruiting problem" lie with BK and not Rees there. As far as QB development Rees has arguably gotten more out of less almost every year, so you don't really have a leg to stand on there.
I readily admit Rees has faults, but I'm typically too busy refuting some of ya'll's fallacies and exaggerations to discuss them. I do think at times he's been slow to make adjustments. I think some game plans have been awful while others were great. I think he's misused a few talents, like forcing Tyree to run between the tackles too often when he's not suited to it. Nobody is perfect. You have to take the bad with the good though, as well as acknowledge the limitations he's worked with as far as Long and BK's failed recruiting. His worst season was still 9 wins with a backup QB. He had multiple Top 10 wins. He broke a Fiesta Bowl record. He had two bowl wins against ranked SEC teams. There's plenty more, but the point is he's not nearly as awful as some people make him out to be, and the fact he received interest from Alabama and other top jobs reinforces that.
Again, a healthy roster is typically comprised of mostly experienced upperclassmen, something we haven't had the luxury of having the last two seasons. When you have guys that are just a few months removed from high school or a year out you're not going to see the same confidence, knowledge, and execution as you will a Junior or Senior who is familiar with the system. I'm not sure why citing the OL and WR struggles is inflammatory, were those not understood to be sore spots holding the team back? We didn't retain Quinn and Del for those very reasons. It doesn't matter who the OC is, if your OL isn't getting it done in the trenches you're not going to be executing like you should. Look how the offense struggled in the first 6 games last season as the OL faltered, then they took off midseason once they finally gelled. This isn't rocket science, is this not a valid point? As far as the WR, are you under some impression that WR recruiting and development was exceptional under BK? In most seasons we were lucky if we had one receiver hit the 1,000 yard mark, let alone a situation like having two guys combine for 2000: Tate/Floyd, Stovall/Samardzija, Samardzija/McKnight, etc. BK never accomplished that, the closest was 2011 with a Weis protege in Floyd along with Eifert. Again, I thought this stuff was pretty common knowledge, but we're seeing WR recruiting turning around in the last year. I believe development has started to improve too under Stuckey yet no receiver eclipsed 361 yards last season in part due to the QB injury.
Quite frankly I find it funny that some people are upset about the Rees move when they wanted him out to begin with (Not calling you out personally here). Whatever happens next season I fully expect the new OC to be successful though. Rees and Freeman have built one of the most experienced and talented offenses that we've had in some time, they're primed to breakout next season. When that inevitably happens I'm sure a number of posters will come back here to say "LOLZ REES SUXORS!" despite the fact he added all the ingredients and has been baking the cake for the last two years.