ShadesO'Green
Member
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 45
And as I post that, partridges Twitter is back but Common theme of further involvement seems likely for non coordinator position
How many boxes of crayons did it take to write 600 pages about Michigan football?
Ha-is this a Stalions Marine joke? Lmao.
Is that an actual possibility?Cant wait for the Jadyn Davis signing day flip to UNC.
... and I'm not even a Tar Heels fan.
It likely is it from Michigan, but will the NCAA accept that as all? That is probably the bigger question.This would be a massive win for Michigan if this is it.
.Does anyone know if what is discussed in court tomorrow will be publicly available
This might be it for what the Big10 is going to do. Which, would be underwhelming. But, this continues to have nothing to do with the NCAA. The NCAA is going to fucking hammer them.
It wasn't a trial on the merits at this point, just a preliminary hearing where the main issue was whether or not to grant a temporary restraining order allowing Harbaugh to coach. As such, it was largely to be based on filings and oral arguments and there was a very low chance that any testimony would have been taken.Did the Big10 have to give evidence during this trial? If so I’m assuming UM didn’t want anything to come out… if not, disregard my baseless assumption.
I agree. If the above is true, it would seem that the conference is done issuing punishment this year. NCAA can't issue punishment yet this year as they are required to give a number of days for Michigan to respond. End result is that Michigan has a realistic chance of stealing someone else's spot in the CFP, which will be a travesty.My read (as an attorney who doesn't practice in this particular field) is a combination of the following:
Just my two cents.
- The B10 believes punishment is warranted, but that they were worried that they may have overstepped their bounds re: the timing of the suspension (which could have seen Harbaugh returning to the field on Saturday while the process plays out);
- The B10 knows that any significant punishment will be the result of the NCAA investigation, and not the conference's; and
- Michigan was worried about making statements under oath that could be contradicted if more bad stuff comes out in the following weeks/months.
Did the Big10 have to give evidence during this trial? If so I’m assuming UM didn’t want anything to come out… if not, disregard my baseless assumption.
But the merit of their claim was only whether the suspension was allowed under the terms of the conference bylaws, not whether Michigan cheated and/or Harbaugh knew about it.They would have needed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims. So, yes.
It wasn't a trial on the merits at this point, just a preliminary hearing where the main issue was whether or not to grant a temporary restraining order allowing Harbaugh to coach. As such, it was largely to be based on filings and oral arguments and there was a very low chance that any testimony would have been taken.
But the merit of their claim was only whether the suspension was allowed under the terms of the conference bylaws, not whether Michigan cheated and/or Harbaugh knew about it.