- Messages
- 20,894
- Reaction score
- 8,126
What follows is a quick statistical comparison of how USF and ND matchup in various aspects of the game. All stats come from Football Outsiders.
USF's Defense
Overall: 27th
Rush Defense: 36th
Pass Defense: 51st
Standard Downs: 20th
Passing Downs: 105th
ND's Defense
Overall: 9th
Rushing Defense: 13th
Passing Defense: 5th
Standard Downs: 5th
Passing Downs: 17th
USF's Offense
Overall: 74th
Rushing: 57th
Passing: 81st
Standard Downs: 66th
Passing Downs: 55th
ND's Offense
Overall: 37th
Passing: 33rd
Rushing: 33rd
Standard Downs: 35th
Passing Downs: 60th
What can we take away from this? The most obvious conclusion is that ND is a much better football team, and when you factor in the significant disparity in number of returning starters, one has to wonder why some Irish fans are getting so worked up about this game.
Let's compare situational performance:
Also worth noting is the USF defense's abysmal performance on passing downs. That is not indicative of a unit that can rush the passer or defend against short "move the chain" routes.
Predictions:
ND rushes for 135 yards and passes for 250 more. USF gains less than 100 yards on the ground, and passes for about 150. Daniels, constantly under pressure, tosses 2 picks. ND also recovers a fumble to win the turnover margin +3.
ND- 27 USF- 10
USF's Defense
Overall: 27th
Rush Defense: 36th
Pass Defense: 51st
Standard Downs: 20th
Passing Downs: 105th
ND's Defense
Overall: 9th
Rushing Defense: 13th
Passing Defense: 5th
Standard Downs: 5th
Passing Downs: 17th
USF's Offense
Overall: 74th
Rushing: 57th
Passing: 81st
Standard Downs: 66th
Passing Downs: 55th
ND's Offense
Overall: 37th
Passing: 33rd
Rushing: 33rd
Standard Downs: 35th
Passing Downs: 60th
What can we take away from this? The most obvious conclusion is that ND is a much better football team, and when you factor in the significant disparity in number of returning starters, one has to wonder why some Irish fans are getting so worked up about this game.
Let's compare situational performance:
- USF's 57th ranked rushing attack (4/11 returning starters) meets our 13th ranked rushing defense (8/11 returning starters).
- USF's 81st ranked passing attack (4/11 returning starters) meets our 5th ranked passing defense (8/11 returning starters).
- ND's 33rd ranked rushing attack (8/11 returning starters) meets USF's 36th ranked rush defense (6/11 returning starters).
- ND's 33rd ranked passing attack (8/11 returning starters) meets USF's 51st ranked pass defense (6/11 returning starters).
Also worth noting is the USF defense's abysmal performance on passing downs. That is not indicative of a unit that can rush the passer or defend against short "move the chain" routes.
Predictions:
- Of all the situational matchups, ND's rush offense against USF's rush defense is the most even. We may struggle to move the ball against them on the ground. By the same token, if we can run successfully against USF, then our ground game is poised for a huge 2011.
- ND shouldn't have much trouble moving the ball through the air; especially not on 3rd and long.
- By the numbers, USF will not be able to run the ball against us.
- That should force the game onto Daniels' arm, which is an even more favorable matchup for the Irish. If our pass rush sees even modest improvement, Daniels is in for a very long day.
ND rushes for 135 yards and passes for 250 more. USF gains less than 100 yards on the ground, and passes for about 150. Daniels, constantly under pressure, tosses 2 picks. ND also recovers a fumble to win the turnover margin +3.
ND- 27 USF- 10
Last edited: