zelezo vlk
Well-known member
- Messages
- 18,363
- Reaction score
- 5,470
This seems kinda big
This seems kinda big
It's hard to imagine they aren't distracted by everything going on, but I doubt Clemson has the dogs to stay in the game.LSU is either going to get upset this weekend or they're going to beat the dog piss out of Clemson.
On the other hand, Ol’ Dabo may have another game plan in him to get them the win. Tough that it’s in Baton Rouge though.LSU is going to clobber Clemson. The energy around Clemson is like dentist office waiting room.
Well, if the bylaw is illegal, then the judge can rule that they cannot enforce it. Think segregation.Can someone explain this to me like I’m 5.. how can a judge overrule the NCAA or SEC rules? Don't all the schools approve of the league bylaws which allows the conference/ NCAA the ability to enforce those said bylaws? All of these court rulings make zero sense to me.
It's all so unserious:
It's all so unserious:
Can someone explain this to me like I’m 5.. how can a judge overrule the NCAA or SEC rules? Don't all the schools approve of the league bylaws which allows the conference/ NCAA the ability to enforce those said bylaws? All of these court rulings make zero sense to me.
Super short answer. The NCAA/SEC rules still have to comply with the law.Short answer, the Sherman Act of 1890.
A bit longer. The members of the NCAA all compete against each other for the same athletes, same fans, and the same money. This makes the schools business rivals. The Sherman Act prohibits business rivals from teaming up and agreeing to limit competition between each other. Courts have determined that schools, through the NCAA, were agreeing with each other to cap compensation.
Just don't join our group or go somewhere else isn't a defense to price fixing. Practically speaking, the NCAA is basically the only path to playing high level college sports, so "don't join" amounts to "don't play at all".
If you are looking for the first legal domino you have to go back to 1984 and NCAA v Board of Regents. That case established that NCAA rules could be challenged under antitrust law.
Edit - NCAA v Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma* (Dawgs were also a plaintiff) was about control of TV broadcasts and allowed schools to make their own TV deals
It's all so unserious:
You mean like that Texas judge with Tech ties ruling in favor of Texas Tech?Imagine that a judge in Baton Rouge ruled in favor of LSU... Didn't see that one coming.
"An injury lawyer 'licking is his lips' right now when a former 'NFL' player hits a 'College' kid and he gets injured". - My neighbor who is a finance attorney brought that up last night while we were watching the GT/CO fiasco. He said signed or not, he has been 'Professionally' trained against an 'Amateur' athelete and it could stand a precedence in a court.The fact that it may not be illegal to allow players that signed professional contracts to then return and play in college is a joke.
I know college isn't amateur, but at some point there needs to be a common sense dividing line between college and pro that you can't cross back from.
Southern judges f'in around these days is a good argument that reconstruction of the southern states after the civil war was a mistake
I'm an injury lawyer and that sounds like a shitty case. Maybe your neighbor should stick to finance law."An injury lawyer 'licking is his lips' right now when a former 'NFL' player hits a 'College' kid and he gets injured". - My neighbor who is a finance attorney brought that up last night while we were watching the GT/CO fiasco. He said signed or not, he has been 'Professionally' trained against an 'Amateur' athelete and it could stand a precedence in a court.
but he said "trust me bro"I'm an injury lawyer and that sounds like a shitty case. Maybe your neighbor should stick to finance law.
I'm not a lawyer and don't know the semantics of how it would work.... you can come on down and tell him to his face. All I did was state what he said.I'm an injury lawyer and that sounds like a shitty case. Maybe your neighbor should stick to finance law.
I’m never met a finance bro with a law degree that I liked. Maybe get some new neighbors.I'm not a lawyer and don't know the semantics of how it would work.... you can come on down and tell him to his face. All I did was state what he said.