As I said, most of the players that have long term damage from the game have it because of repeated blows over the course of their career. Second of all, what dirty hits are we talking about with the Saints? They have been in the bottom half of the league in penalties for the last 5 years. Bounties simply did not correlate to illegal hits as many of you are implying. Players aren't stupid enough to risk $500k fines for a $5k bounty.
Just because a player is trying to knock a player out of the game, doesn't mean that they plan on doing it illegally. As I mentioned before, if you are a pass rusher that isn't trying to take the opposing QB out of the game (legally of course), then you wont be in the league for very long.
I don't think anybody (I'm not at, at least) is really arguing that, Wooly. Why people keep coming back at you is because earlier on in the thread, you said the penalty was BS and tried to help rationalize your argument by saying it goes on across the league and is a part of the history of the game. I haven't made one statement, personally, of whether I agree with any of this or not, but these are the facts of the case that I and others see and are arguing:
-The Saints team knowingly engaged in an illegal activity for at least 3 years
-The Saints management tried to cover it up
-The Saints management lied to the commissioner about it (and why would Payton feel the need to lie to Goodell about something that is a perfectly fine practice to engage in??)
-The Saints team and management were punished by their superiors for these actions (and Vilma and probably some other players will be levied a punishment too)
So I say to you-- did USC get screwed by the NCAA for their violations of rules? I mean come on, did Reggie Bush really get an unfair advantage by having his family's house paid for? This type of stuff goes on everywhere and it's been going on since the inception of college football and "amateur" athletics. So really, the NCAA punishment was bullsh!t because we can't prove Reggie Bush played better because of his illegal benefit, the USC football team and/or athletic department spit in the face over the practice to their governing body because it's really unjust to have these players "only" getting a scholarship that covers their academic pursuit, and everybody else has been doing it since the dawn of the game?
You're starting to sound like Col. Jessup admitting you ordered the Code Red, but see no reason whatsoever why you were wrong to do so.
(And now let's wait for the obligatory Top-10 movie line of all time coming in 5...4...3...)
