Yeah anyone saying meetings can't be moved around obviously isn't in the real working world yet. Things happen shit changes get used to it.
I have great need of a new MacBook charger, so as I don't have to try and track this thread on my phone.
I had to replace mine recently too. Almost made me sick paying $70 on a charger!
What's more "important" or "serious?"
A) A football player commits academic fraud by turning in a paper written by another student
B) 10 non-athletes engaged in academic fraud by hacking the Business school's online grading system to change their grades.
Which is the more serious problem for the University? Which is the more serious problem for a fan of the football team?
Hint...the answers are different.
I almost feel bad for the new mods who have to deal with this shitstorm tonight.
Is this thread of the year material or what. These last 2500+ hundred post are unmatched in the annals of the internet(s). Am I right or am I RIGHT
Spot on, Autry.... Spot on. That's how the real world works.
I had to replace mine recently too. Almost made me sick paying $70 on a charger!
Is this thread of the year material or what. These last 2500+ hundred post are unmatched in the annals of the internet(s). Am I right or am I RIGHT
Yes, this is how it works when you have routine decisions to make. When you have major decisions to make that have a huge, public impact on the university, you alter the unimportant details of the process accordingly. I am on dozens of committees at my university. Without exception, when something serious comes up (and we're talking much less serious than a 'scandal' that makes national headlines), everyone finds a way to alter schedules in order to address it. This includes very large committees, and it includes very small committees. Some may not make it to a meeting, or may call in, whatever. But when a unique opportunity arises, a flexible organization does what it needs to do to take advantage of it. When a potential scandal or threat occurs, the same happens. It involves seeing what is important about bylaws and guidelines and seeing what is unimportant, and valuing the health of the institution without sacrificing the *important* principles that guide the institution.
I never went to Our University
I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
However, what have we heard from him in the past weeks that is true?
Nothing. He also told us Greg Bryant was Gonzo... Bullshit.
I'm done with his insight.
Don't get an apple and you won't get nickel and dimed.
Information war! The have and the have-nots. The have-nots come into battle with larger numbers. The haves arm themselves with superior communication and surveillance.
I want a good clean fight.
![]()
I almost feel bad for the new mods who have to deal with this shitstorm tonight.
you've missed the point. in each case, a process would occur to address the issue and that process would have to adhere to a set of important principles. the question is not which scenario is more serious or important, the question is which details of that process are important to maintaining those principles and which are not?
In the business school example, imagine (humor me) that there is a scenario like medical residencies, where hundreds of firms are making hiring decisions from business schools across the country and decisions are being made on 9/1. The university realizes that if they carry out their normal disciplinary process, which extends through 9/10, all of the business school class will be at a severe disadvantage b/c no firms know for sure whose grades are correct and whose are fraudulent. do they continue with the timeline of their disciplinary process, despite the fact that sticking with that timeline will potentially do major damage to the business school reputation and may damage the trajectories of a lot of students unnecessarily? Or do they tweak the timeline and push things forward so that the issue is resolved and clarity is generated before the hiring deadline, even though it involves tweaking the standard guidelines for the disciplinary process?
Many of you are arguing that every aspect of the process should be maintained, without revision, no matter the circumstances or consequences. My point is that there are circumstances where aspects of the process, like the timeline of meetings, can be altered--and common sense suggests should be altered--without any sacrifice to the underlying principles of the university or the disciplinary process. the inability to distinguish between important principles and unimportant rules of process can run ineffective institutions into the ground.
I ordered one on Amazon for $20, but shipping is estimated between Sept 20 and October 20. Wtf.
Come to think of it, didn't this issue pop up around the time we got new mods? This whole mess could be their fault. What day did their modship take effect?
I almost feel bad for the new mods who have to deal with this shitstorm tonight.
See but you don't know the facts of what cases are in front of the council. What if the 10 non-athletes in my example are applying for prestigious fellowships that have a deadline on 9/5/14? And what if there case was pending prior to the football player case?
We have no idea what their caseload looks like. Everyone is assuming there's nothing serious on this council's plate but nobody knows shit.
I need the Mac. I look at far too much questionable material. The anti-virus capability is of great importance.*
*Cant decide how serious this actually is
A fantastically underrated film.
This seems to be off the topic of whatever this thread is about. Can we get a mod to clean this up?
Don't get an apple and you won't get nickel and dimed.
PM me, I can send you one.