lmao the moderators only appear biased to you if you already are working on rationalizing what Trump is saying as something legitimate.
I can only imagine the think pieces that would be dropped if Joe Biden stumbled through a speech saying "Listen Jack.....the......MAGA people are......eating cats and dogs...I've seen videos". We would absolutely be seeing dozens of posts here about how unfit he is. Or if Kamala called Trump a fascist like him calling her a marxist? But yeah the moderators are so biased that they always gave him the last word and said "Thank you Sir" after something like "they're transing the illegals! in prison!".
And there are plenty of lies unchecked on Kamala that the moderators did not touch. Should the moderators be able to know all of these things to fact check live during the debate? No, that's pretty unreasonable. However, if you are not going to have producers work to fact check and provide the moderators even fact checking on both sides, then it is very clear that selectively only fact checking one side shows incredible bias. That's not to say that Trump did a good job, because he did pretty fucking horribly. But it is also true that the Moderators clearly slanted the debate to help Kamala.
Kamala denied ever supporting firearm buy backs (lie)
Kamala brought up the Charlottesville "fine people on both sides" line (lie)
Harris claimed that it would be a bloodbath for America, implying that he was going to advocate for violence if he lost when he was clearly talking about the automobile industry (nothing)
Trump claimed babies were killed outside the womb in failed abortions. Under Tim Walz, babies born alive in botched abortions are allowed to be left to die. Eight babies who survived abortions in Minnesota were abandoned and sadly perished under Walz. The ABC moderators simply said Trump was lying and moved on without adding context.