I'm feeling Oklahoma 2012 is going to happen
we live by the O Line, we die by the O Line......not Golson
Usually I have multipoint opinions, but this time [other than handing out gameballs to Fuller, Folston, Luke, and Riggs --- with nods to Jones, Day, Rochell, Utupo for holding up to the pace] I'm going to make my most enraging comment in my few years here.
Everett is unteachable.
I've wondered what has been bothering me so much about this fantastic athlete who can do so much. Today, due to my long years playing Basketball, it dawned on me. Golson is a basketball player who happens to be playing football. All my time playing BBall indicated to me that you rarely could teach a basketball player how to excel at offensive scoring --- all the RollsRoyces that I played with or against had learned their sugar moves and their when-to-do-what by playing street ball, not by coaching. You could coach them to break a press [maybe], run a defense [maybe], set up an offense and MAYBE execute ONE play, but when the moving started, it was all the imprinted non-thinking instincts learned "in the street."
So here's Kelly with his masterful offensive designs. He knows that if his QB will just run the playbook properly [this includes sussing the defense pre-snap and getting into a better option], step up into the pocket and deliver rapidly, then he cannot be stopped. Especially when there are people named Fuller, Robinson, Carlisle, Prosise, Koyack out there, he cannot be stopped.
But Everett can't do it. It's not him. Kelly tells him that he'd like him to step up into the pocket, and Everett's instincts are SCREAMING otherwise. Like a good soldier he tries to do it, and we have a first quarter against UNC --- catastrophe. Kelly says "Everett, don't hold the ball so long!". Like a good soldier, Everett tries both to stay in the pocket AND deliver, but he can't interpret the defense accurately [or actually isn't seeing all of it due to height] and we get several nerve-jangling flub throws which might just ALL have been picked.
Practice for a real football quarterback is very effective, as is filmroom. Practice for a basketball player is good for conditioning, getting insight on how to defend your opponent, and maybe trying to polish up a couple of plays which the coach knows have worked with these guys in past games. The tip goes up, and the instincts of the street rise to the surface [at least after the initial two mechanical passes.]
Why then do we succeed? We have the finest athlete playing QB in the nation. When the circumstances of "play-called" and "middle blocked" and "field seen" mesh, then the great arm finds the great weapons, almost always at least one of which has been open. And we have Kelly, who keeps calling the plays which can't be consistently defended and then crosses his fingers that Everett will occasionally make the correct adjustment, see the open weapon, and deliver the ball on time.
Kelly's stomach must be ironclad. He is constantly counting on the amazing fact that the weapons and the plays are so good that all we need to do is get one success every three downs, almost regardless of down and distance.
Maybe mere time on the field will get Everett the street-tools to game it on the turf just like the hardwood. If you watched the eyes and the demeanor of the UNC QB you saw the correct look of a QB who had the game by the throat, even with an inferior team.
This is an interesting season. Can mere incredible athleticism at the critical position continue to win them all? Fingers crossed. Antacid tablets in hand.
Eh. Unteachable? That's way too harsh. Golson is WAY better this season than 2012. I mean there is no comparison really. Cut the guy some slack. This is only his 17th game played for ND and he missed a whole season last year of games, film study, practice, etc.Usually I have multipoint opinions, but this time [other than handing out gameballs to Fuller, Folston, Luke, and Riggs --- with nods to Jones, Day, Rochell, Utupo for holding up to the pace] I'm going to make my most enraging comment in my few years here.
Everett is unteachable.
I've wondered what has been bothering me so much about this fantastic athlete who can do so much. Today, due to my long years playing Basketball, it dawned on me. Golson is a basketball player who happens to be playing football. All my time playing BBall indicated to me that you rarely could teach a basketball player how to excel at offensive scoring --- all the RollsRoyces that I played with or against had learned their sugar moves and their when-to-do-what by playing street ball, not by coaching. You could coach them to break a press [maybe], run a defense [maybe], set up an offense and MAYBE execute ONE play, but when the moving started, it was all the imprinted non-thinking instincts learned "in the street."
So here's Kelly with his masterful offensive designs. He knows that if his QB will just run the playbook properly [this includes sussing the defense pre-snap and getting into a better option], step up into the pocket and deliver rapidly, then he cannot be stopped. Especially when there are people named Fuller, Robinson, Carlisle, Prosise, Koyack out there, he cannot be stopped.
But Everett can't do it. It's not him. Kelly tells him that he'd like him to step up into the pocket, and Everett's instincts are SCREAMING otherwise. Like a good soldier he tries to do it, and we have a first quarter against UNC --- catastrophe. Kelly says "Everett, don't hold the ball so long!". Like a good soldier, Everett tries both to stay in the pocket AND deliver, but he can't interpret the defense accurately [or actually isn't seeing all of it due to height] and we get several nerve-jangling flub throws which might just ALL have been picked.
Practice for a real football quarterback is very effective, as is filmroom. Practice for a basketball player is good for conditioning, getting insight on how to defend your opponent, and maybe trying to polish up a couple of plays which the coach knows have worked with these guys in past games. The tip goes up, and the instincts of the street rise to the surface [at least after the initial two mechanical passes.]
Why then do we succeed? We have the finest athlete playing QB in the nation. When the circumstances of "play-called" and "middle blocked" and "field seen" mesh, then the great arm finds the great weapons, almost always at least one of which has been open. And we have Kelly, who keeps calling the plays which can't be consistently defended and then crosses his fingers that Everett will occasionally make the correct adjustment, see the open weapon, and deliver the ball on time.
Kelly's stomach must be ironclad. He is constantly counting on the amazing fact that the weapons and the plays are so good that all we need to do is get one success every three downs, almost regardless of down and distance.
Maybe mere time on the field will get Everett the street-tools to game it on the turf just like the hardwood. If you watched the eyes and the demeanor of the UNC QB you saw the correct look of a QB who had the game by the throat, even with an inferior team.
This is an interesting season. Can mere incredible athleticism at the critical position continue to win them all? Fingers crossed. Antacid tablets in hand.
I will say this. If Golson cannot manage the TOs better he must be benched. Rees was blasted for all the TOs last year and we did not have a defense to help him out. 10 TOs in 3 games is unacceptable. I have zero faith in his ability run with the ball and maintain possession. It's downright scary. IDK what can be done but if you lose the TO battle you typically lose. Our defense had a shit game tonight and we managed to do enough offensively to win. That will not happen against FSU. Got to get that fixed Tomorrow.
I don't see any scenario where Golson is benched. He is the straw that stirs the drink. Regardless of TOs, he makes the offense go.
I can for sure. I am not saying will. His TOs are unacceptable. They are bad. All of them. They are not mistakes or flukes. They are bad decisions. You can't have a QB making those throws or diving head first for a run. I defended Tommy and I will support Everett but dagum.... Three weeks in a row he is showing really poor decisions.
I can for sure. I am not saying will. His TOs are unacceptable. They are bad. All of them. They are not mistakes or flukes. They are bad decisions. You can't have a QB making those throws or diving head first for a run. I defended Tommy and I will support Everett but dagum.... Three weeks in a row he is showing really poor decisions.
Mistakes before today seemed to just be a young team/ or Golson getting reacclimated to full speed. Mistakes today seemed like a team that was not mentally locked in to the fact that this was a dangerous game opponent.
Golson has to speed up his maturation as a leader. It is probably not a good idea for him to think he has to carry this team to victory. He continues to play great in spots and really poor in others.
Matt Hegarty continues to struggle, but I think Elmer played better today. The holding calls on Stanley were pretty weak.
Special Teams bottled up a really good Tarheel return game.
Defense really looked flat today with the exception of Isaac Rochelle who has been turning it up each week. Schmidt was solid again, Sheldon struggled with UNC linemen holding him what seemed like all afternoon. Jaylon, and the Dbacks looked a little out of sorts. The majority of their offense whether it was passing or running was done right in the middle of our defense. I think we will put this one behind us and come back more focused next week. It is good to be 6-0 and there is no way we win a game like this a few years ago. I still say we are a pretty good team.
Game balls go to Folston and Fuller on offense.
Rochelle on defense.
It's interesting to me. Dayne Crist lasted 3min because of turnovers, Golson got yanked in 2012 for whatever mistake he made throughout the year, And Tommy, is, well, Tommy. Golson is just being careless. Either Kelly just really like Everett or Malik is just not ready. Period.
I'm not willing to jump on the "exposed" train just yet. I feel that UNC runs a gimmicky type offense. Plus let's not forget we handed them 21 points. Potentially 24.
I will say this, I played this game at the medium level we will say ( ohio U). It was easier to play against better teams in my opinion. Not that you can "play" with them, but the ins and outs of the game was easier. Van gorder will be better prepared for Florida state in part because they have a identity. UNC, they're just trying to survive and use the athletes they have. Take that, trap type game snd spotting them all those points, just screamed for a blah afternoon.
We'll jump to 5 and FSU will go 2. In my opinion
50 points, 500 yards. No mystery here, Golson gets results even with the mistakes.
Golson also makes plays to win games and extend drives that no one else on the roster can make.
UNC has identity they are basically a crappy Baylor. The game was about execution and UNC executed, ND's D did not and had plenty of busted coverages, and missed tackles. Blown coverages are blown coverages, and missed tackles translated negatively regardless of who you play.
I will say Van Gorder will be much better off against FSU do the fact FSU does not do a whole lot of no huddle up tempo offense. FSU may go up tempo occasionally in a 2 min situation, or for a change of pace. Jimbo Fisher comes from the Nick Saban school of coaching and that school of coaching has never been big on the no huddle rapid pace offense.
BVG should be able to run his D which is very very complicated for the college much better against a slower tempo.
Chicago!!!!! Where you been?
Our fans react to every game like the sky is falling, even when we win. I think someone said after each of the first four games that if we play like that against Stanford we would get killed. Well, either we did and he didn't get killed or we didn't. But either way, the lesson is that you can't really know anything for sure about how a future game will go based on what you think you saw in a previous game. They are all different. Different matchups, different gameplans and different performances by players (good and bad).
I'm not saying that ND has nothing to worry about. Clearly they have a ton to clean up and improve on. But they're winning. People act like every other good team is perfect every week, but the reality is that every team struggles some games. No team is perfect, and you don't have to be. You just have to be better than the team you play each week.
Our fans react to every game like the sky is falling, even when we win. I think someone said after each of the first four games that if we play like that against Stanford we would get killed. Well, either we did and he didn't get killed or we didn't. But either way, the lesson is that you can't really know anything for sure about how a future game will go based on what you think you saw in a previous game. They are all different. Different matchups, different gameplans and different performances by players (good and bad).
I'm not saying that ND has nothing to worry about. Clearly they have a ton to clean up and improve on. But they're winning. People act like every other good team is perfect every week, but the reality is that every team struggles some games. No team is perfect, and you don't have to be. You just have to be better than the team you play each week.