Michigan has signed more California kids in the past 5 years than ND. It's a total myth Independce is helpful in national recruiting, let alone west coast. They don't ever play in Cali.
Same is true when you expand to states of Washington/Oregon/Arizona/Colorado/Utah - Michigan has signed more.
Failed logic. Just because MI signs guys from out west doesn't mean Independence isn't helpful in recruiting.
Diving into your point... how many of these MI offer/commits were offered by ND? I kinda pay attention to these things and I can think of only a couple of guys who had ND offers and they were plan B's who weren't in a position to choose ND when they decided. How many guys like Mason Graham, Zeke Berry, Jeff Persi not to mention the other too low to offer MI commits would have chosen ND instead? The 3 I just named would've.
Lastly, MI and ND have very different recruiting models. MI hands out more offers than anyone this side of Tennessee. They oofer 2x as many players as ND and 2x as many CA kids. If ND was playing in the high 3* pool of CA kids, they'd have half a roster of CA kids.
As for the other states, they are meaningless statistically. ND needs to worry about the ACC footprint, TX, CA, IL, OH, MI & IN and every demographic fit that lets ND know they are interested, especially in ND friendly football areas like StL, PHX and NOLA.
All that said, with SC, OR and UDub coming to the B1G, how will THAT impact ND's ability to recruit the players they need out of the West.
That is a concern.