sharksamardzija8345
The Shark
- Messages
- 2,256
- Reaction score
- 169
Because we'd probably rough the punter and get penalized.
coach em up..
Because we'd probably rough the punter and get penalized.
coach em up..
Same could be said for setting up a return, but apparently it's easier said than done.
I just don't think we have the athletes to return punts..
This is an overly general statement. The 2008, 2009 teams played hard and pulled out their share of close games.
Too general? Citing your chosen team years:
'08 - Lost 5 of the last 7 games of the season.
'09 - Lost the last 4 games of the season setting an All-Time ND mark for Snatching Defeat From The Jaws Of Victory.
The '08 and '09 teams were 1 (Navy) and 7 (UNC, PIT, BC, SYR, USC, Navy, PIT, CON, SU) in months named November. Wanna recap those games?
Folks,
Face a coupole realities. First, Tommy Rees is a MAC level QB and you folks are accepting him being our QB. He has reached his ceiling and it is reachable by any avg D-1 player. For all you folks saying I just hate on Tommy. You are right in the fact I do not accept mediocre. He is sooo average it is pathetic. BC figured out really quick how to stop our AVERAGE QB. Rush 2-3 players and drop 8-9. Our QB can't beat anybody with his legs and surely can't overwhelm with his arm.
Second, our pass defense is sooo average. Luck has to be salivating for next week. He will shred us.
I just don't think we have the athletes to return punts..
Folks,
Face a coupole realities. First, Tommy Rees is a MAC level QB and you folks are accepting him being our QB. He has reached his ceiling and it is reachable by any avg D-1 player. For all you folks saying I just hate on Tommy. You are right in the fact I do not accept mediocre. He is sooo average it is pathetic. BC figured out really quick how to stop our AVERAGE QB. Rush 2-3 players and drop 8-9. Our QB can't beat anybody with his legs and surely can't overwhelm with his arm.
Second, our pass defense is sooo average. Luck has to be salivating for next week. He will shred us.
Thanks for the research; he didn't say anything about November. I just didn't like his word choice, saying that we 'folded.' I took it to mean that we quit, but I don't think that was the case under Weis, even if they finished off those years poorly. They were poorly conditioned and coached; 'folding' had nothing to do with it.
L 11/07/09 21 Navy 23 South Bend
L 11/14/09 22 Pittsburgh 27 Pittsburgh
L 11/21/09 30 Connecticut 33 South Bend
L 11/28/09 38 Stanford 45 Palo Alto
You know he is a sophomore right? You know he is playing better than Brady Quinn was during his sophomore year.
Syracuse had a better conditioned team? More talent? Correct me if I'm wrong but they're coach had been fired, hadn't he?
UConn's QB transferred from ND because he was 4th or 5th on the depth chart. Again UConn had a better conditioned team? More talent? Coaching?
Sadly, his post was correct. When the going gets tough, the tough get going. In '08 and '09more times that not that meant the other teams especially in the month of November.
Here are the '09 November games, note the closeness, wanna recap which team prevailed in the 4th Q for the wins?
HTML:L 11/07/09 21 Navy 23 South Bend L 11/14/09 22 Pittsburgh 27 Pittsburgh L 11/21/09 30 Connecticut 33 South Bend L 11/28/09 38 Stanford 45 Palo Alto
You know he is a sophomore right? You know he is playing better than Brady Quinn was during his sophomore year.
Somehow Rees has been able to win,despite his short comings.He is playing with a bum knee so why risk running ? The other problem that I saw was that the offensive line sucked just like in the USC game.They didnt control the line of scrimmage on runs.Pass blocking should be a little better too.
Folks,
Face a coupole realities. First, Tommy Rees is a MAC level QB and you folks are accepting him being our QB. He has reached his ceiling and it is reachable by any avg D-1 player. For all you folks saying I just hate on Tommy. You are right in the fact I do not accept mediocre. He is sooo average it is pathetic. BC figured out really quick how to stop our AVERAGE QB. Rush 2-3 players and drop 8-9. Our QB can't beat anybody with his legs and surely can't overwhelm with his arm.
Second, our pass defense is sooo average. Luck has to be salivating for next week. He will shred us.
I'm not as down on Tommy. He is who he is. Most guys playing in their second year starting are Seniors. The biggest jump in Physical strength for the vast majority of players I've been around is between years 2 and 3 in a program. I think he'll be a different kid in terms of size and strength...he'll have another off season and spring behind him. He'll be mentally better off. I'm not writing him off
...but I'm not in the Tommy is the only answer camp either...its obvious if you know anything about football there are some things lacking right now...BUT, I am also positive he's better than the alternative right now.
The thing that stacks the odds against Tommy more than Tommy's decisions or physical tools are the apparent inability of our receivers to create their own space...w/o floyd drawing double teams, this is a huge concern. While Eifert can draw extra attention, it isn't the same...Tommy needs a player to emerge from one of the receivers...
In the end, I believe a mobile QB will be the survival option in the absence of Floyd...
Should be a fun spring and fall camp...I think Hendrix gets the nod.
I was all over the Tommy koolaid during the Michigan game. He was reading and shredding that defense like a grater on soft cheddar. Since then I am not sure what has happened...
I predict Stanford plays the same D next week and makes Rees look even more silly. They will INT him at least 3 times.
I highly doubt that he'll get much bigger physically. In person, he just has a small frame and his arm strength and mobility are pretty much at their ceiling. So I'm with you- I don't think he'll be the best QB next spring.
Opponents have figured out how to exploit his weaknesses.