ND's Talking Heads ... The good, bad & ugly

Irish5Saint

Well-known member
Messages
569
Reaction score
1,111
Id recommend it cause there is also the part where they mention that sources told them that Angeli did not have a good practice week leading up to Purdue.
The PR war on this has been hilarious. There is definitely some divide in the Gug over Riley and Steve
 

IrishSpartan

Well-known member
Messages
3,035
Reaction score
2,393
II- mouth piece for the gug
IB- Homers
ISD- probably most free form
On3- likes to follow the company-line (supposedly getting better)

This is how I view it. Could change.
 

Irish5Saint

Well-known member
Messages
569
Reaction score
1,111
II- mouth piece for the gug
IB- Homers
ISD- probably most free form
On3- likes to follow the company-line (supposedly getting better)

This is how I view it. Could change.
I’d say II is the best connected on beat reporting. I think they’re healthy skeptics.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,495
ISD has always been the go-to for me. II is too close to power that they often become a mouth piece for propaganda. I do like Brice though. And I'll give TP props for pushing Denbrock on the NIU second half game plan when it was clear something was up with Riley AND the RBs still weren't getting touches.

Christian and Matt's intel for recruiting is hard to be rivaled. And I haven't seen anyone come close to Jamie's film review and player profiling. People gripe about Mike, but he's still clearly tied into the program and his insider info is valuable to listeners.

In terms of Steve vs Riley, I think the OL injuries just solidified Riley as the starter for the rest of the season. Steve doesn't have the escapability or the run threat that Riley has and it'll become an even bigger factor now.
 

bumpdaddy

Well-known member
Messages
431
Reaction score
1,020
There is divide amongst those not actually on the team. Every fanbase does this. If he was better, they wouldn't have went out and got Leonard.
What was discussed by the beat writers and this board at the time, myself included, was the fact that ND had to look for a portal QB no matter what because the QB room was too thin and too young. They had just lost 2 QBs to the portal the year before in Pyne and Buchner and would have had only SA, KM, and CJ to start the spring. MF couldn't risk SA or KM winning the starting job, the other transferring, and then being left with only 1 inexperienced QB as the starter and only 1 scholarship backup who happened to be a true freshman.

They had to get a portal QB.

Now, if one of those 3 guys had been a Trevor Lawrence MF might have come to a different conclusion, but I don't think this was simply a matter of they didn't think Angeli was good enough to be a starter. Maybe they thought that, but I think it's much more likely they thought their QB room was too thin and too inexperienced, so once they committed to looking for a portal QB, they also committed to finding someone they thought would be the starter for 1 year and then hope that they would have at least 3 scholarship QBs to start the year rather than 2. The fact they ended up with all 4 sticking around was a great development (I think RL's injury played a huge role in SA's decision to stay).

Now, none of this is to say I don't think MF shouldn't have some buyer's remorse. I think he made the right decision to go after a portal QB. And with what most experts knew at the time, it was also likely the right decision to go after RL. BUT, now that they've had ample time to coach and evaluate him, there is no good reason to stick with him as the starter no matter what. By now, MF and staff should know whether or not RL gives them their best chance to win. I don't think he does, but I also think the staff plans to stick with him until the next time the offense struggles in a game. If that's the plan I hope they make a switch in enough time to make a difference and then commit to that switch.
 

CANONIZEFATHERSORIN

Well-known member
Messages
1,081
Reaction score
906
ISD has always been the go-to for me. II is too close to power that they often become a mouth piece for propaganda. I do like Brice though. And I'll give TP props for pushing Denbrock on the NIU second half game plan when it was clear something was up with Riley AND the RBs still weren't getting touches.

Christian and Matt's intel for recruiting is hard to be rivaled. And I haven't seen anyone come close to Jamie's film review and player profiling. People gripe about Mike, but he's still clearly tied into the program and his insider info is valuable to listeners.

In terms of Steve vs Riley, I think the OL injuries just solidified Riley as the starter for the rest of the season. Steve doesn't have the escapability or the run threat that Riley has and it'll become an even bigger factor now.

You realize a quarterback’s main job is passing the football right?
 

LifelongFan

Well-known member
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
1,919
Skip II's post-game Overtime.

It's a half hour of ridiculing fans saying outrageous things like "Rendell doesn't punt well" and "RL hasn't passed well."
I opened up this thread to say this. They seem to not get why people are upset about Leonard's performance.
 

IrishSpartan

Well-known member
Messages
3,035
Reaction score
2,393
I don’t get why all the beat guys outside of ISD and Brice are neglecting the real problem with RL. Yes he runs great but Purdue ran man the whole time. We are very well built to deal with man. But with the way he’s playing teams are just going to play zone and make him throw to win and with his accuracy and failure to go through reads it’s going to be a problem. Yes RL played great on Saturday but all of his throws were first read and within 6 yards. It’s an issue.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,485
Reaction score
14,227
I don’t get why all the beat guys outside of ISD and Brice are neglecting the real problem with RL. Yes he runs great but Purdue ran man the whole time. We are very well built to deal with man. But with the way he’s playing teams are just going to play zone and make him throw to win and with his accuracy and failure to go through reads it’s going to be a problem. Yes RL played great on Saturday but all of his throws were first read and within 6 yards. It’s an issue.
Agreed on all counts.

If people are content still being upset about losing to NIU, that's on them, though. It's done. I'm far more interested in what they're going to do offensively moving forward to avoid another loss like it, because "just run the damn ball" only works until it doesn't. Then when you have to throw, it's fuck around and find out time.
 

IrishSpartan

Well-known member
Messages
3,035
Reaction score
2,393
Agreed on all counts.

If people are content still being upset about losing to NIU, that's on them, though. It's done. I'm far more interested in what they're going to do offensively moving forward to avoid another loss like it, because "just run the damn ball" only works until it doesn't. Then when you have to throw, it's fuck around and find out time.
Yeah I really don’t care about the NIU game anymore it’s over and done with but now anytime it seems that someone mentions this issue the beat just says that we need to move on about NIU. They are neglecting the fact that people are not talking about NIU.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,495
You realize a quarterback’s main job is passing the football right?

I think you may have missed my point. If the OL can't protect the QB, then a statue of a pocket passer is useless. Steve took a couple really bad sacks against Purdue. Riley absolutely needs to get better at throwing the ball, but if the OL can't keep the QB upright, then a mobile QB is what will be necessary to keep the offense on the field. It may not look pretty, but I just have a feeling it's exactly what we're going to see.

Yes, prior to the OL injuries, I was yelling at my TV for a change. And for transparency, I mean similar to how BK used Golson/Rees back in the day. I still believe that Angeli would've gotten the offense out of their funk against NIU and they would've won that game. But that doesn't mean that I think Steve needs to be the starter and RL gets benched (especially given the OL injuries). Denbrock will get it figured out.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,495
I don’t get why all the beat guys outside of ISD and Brice are neglecting the real problem with RL. Yes he runs great but Purdue ran man the whole time. We are very well built to deal with man. But with the way he’s playing teams are just going to play zone and make him throw to win and with his accuracy and failure to go through reads it’s going to be a problem. Yes RL played great on Saturday but all of his throws were first read and within 6 yards. It’s an issue.

Agreed. It's one of the main reasons why I can't listen to II anymore, or when I do, it's because of Brice.

They have two weeks until UL to get this offense going. I think the OL injuries will cause some issues, but I also feel like a Golson/Rees 2.0 experiment could be in the works if RL continues to struggle throwing. He's way too valuable with his legs, but they have got to figure out something in the pass game.
 

IRISHDODGER

Blue Chip Recruit
Messages
8,046
Reaction score
6,117
What I hope to see from RL this weekend is the exact same thing he did against Purdue. Just run the damn ball and put up a shit ton of points. I want to go into Louisville with them expectatinh that is our game plan. Then vs Louisville I want to improvements from him in the passing game, going through progressions and throwing down the field more. He can't be one dimensional against Louisville
My expectation is ND runs same concepts vs Miami that they ran vs Purdue. Miami looks to be better defending the pass based on pass efficiency D. My hope is ND can get a comfortable enough lead to allow RL to build on his pass reps b/c he’s gonna need them when UL comes to town.

It’s waaaay too early, but as of now; I’m guessing Purdue is easily the worst team on this schedule.
 

Some Irish Bloke

Five foot nothin', a hundred and nothin'
Messages
6,346
Reaction score
5,922
They have two weeks until UL to get this offense going. I think the OL injuries will cause some issues, but I also feel like a Golson/Rees 2.0 experiment could be in the works if RL continues to struggle throwing. He's way too valuable with his legs, but they have got to figure out something in the pass game.
This is exactly what I hope they end up doing.
 

FWIrish4

Well-known member
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
2,833
Prister pumping sunshine, as usual.


I mean where was the lie in his response?

Everyone agrees, the accuracy has to get better. Can he? He did it at Duke at the level we need, but I think missing half of last season and this spring really hurt his development. I’m not sure if he can but the offense play calls are getting better and more suited for him and the offense as a whole (see screenshot below). I’m pretty sure they have a leash on him and aren’t afraid to put Angeli in (should have in the NIU game).

There is no excuse why the offensive game plan was to drop Riley back to throw 32 times with 1 play action pass AND not running him once after the 2nd quarter in the NIU game.
 

Huntr

24 Karat Shamrock
Messages
7,506
Reaction score
10,433
I mean where was the lie in his response?

Everyone agrees, the accuracy has to get better. Can he? He did it at Duke at the level we need, but I think missing half of last season and this spring really hurt his development. I’m not sure if he can but the offense play calls are getting better and more suited for him and the offense as a whole (see screenshot below). I’m pretty sure they have a leash on him and aren’t afraid to put Angeli in (should have in the NIU game).

There is no excuse why the offensive game plan was to drop Riley back to throw 32 times with 1 play action pass AND not running him once after the 2nd quarter in the NIU game.

He's downplaying RL's problems, just like he and O'Malley did Saturday night in their Overtime podcast.

RL has more issues than just accuracy.
 
Top