Valpodoc85
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,719
- Reaction score
- 466
Freeman to USC…..
Freeman to USC…..
Boy has he been disappointing so far.
A+ recruiter, though.
Love the recruiting, hate the defense.
Some of it I'll blame on scheme.
But I think the vast majority is we give up a huge amount of yards after initial contact.
Having trouble finding what the average is this year, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's 5 or 6 yards against us.
That is the Joes not the Xs and Os.
USC also scored 29 points last time we played them
Crawford for his size was a good tackler. Three man rushes is Xs and Os and we have the Joes to play 4 D lineman two deep. I will take Clark Lea. We didn’t come close to an Int tonight with our so called aggressive guys flying all around defense.
We had a pick almost go for 6…. Also the play that was almost called for targeting was close to an INT too off the top of my head.Crawford for his size was a good tackler. Three man rushes is Xs and Os and we have the Joes to play 4 D lineman two deep. I will take Clark Lea. We didn’t come close to an Int tonight with our so called aggressive guys flying all around defense.
We had a pick almost go for 6…. Also the play that was almost called for targeting was close to an INT too off the top of my head.
USC also scored 29 points last time we played them. That performance was still seen as great job by Lea because they stifled Pittman who was talking all week. Lea was so good schematically that it was obvious to the trained or untrained eye week to week. But the Freeman backlash can be a bit much
I have two issues with the D and I'm fairly certain they're both fixable:
1) Too much time not using 4 DL. Still struggling to figure out why Freeman is insistent on it sometimes. I think it's clear that schematically he prefers 3 over 4 DL, but if that's the personnel we have right now on the team then why not use it? It's clearly effective. STOP. LINING. FOSKEY. UP. AT. THE. 2ND. LEVEL.
2) Tackling. WTF?? I mean, it's BAD. SC didn't have many big plays other than London's 40y catch. I would venture to guess 1/2 the rest of their yardage was after the catch. All too often their RBs were hit behind the lone, but would then fall forward for 4, 5, 6 yards. Same with the receivers (oddly enough big bodies TEs seemed to go right down). Sure up the tackling and I think the optics become MUCH better.
USC had given up 7 sacks on the year prior to last night where we had 3.
People are looking for stuff to complain about. Specifically, I think some people have an issue with Freeman that for the life of me I cannot figure out.
The 3-2-6 scheme seems to becoming more popular against pass happy teams.I have two issues with the D and I'm fairly certain they're both fixable:
1) Too much time not using 4 DL. Still struggling to figure out why Freeman is insistent on it sometimes. I think it's clear that schematically he prefers 3 over 4 DL, but if that's the personnel we have right now on the team then why not use it? It's clearly effective. STOP. LINING. FOSKEY. UP. AT. THE. 2ND. LEVEL.
2) Tackling. WTF?? I mean, it's BAD. SC didn't have many big plays other than London's 40y catch. I would venture to guess 1/2 the rest of their yardage was after the catch. All too often their RBs were hit behind the lone, but would then fall forward for 4, 5, 6 yards. Same with the receivers (oddly enough big bodies TEs seemed to go right down). Sure up the tackling and I think the optics become MUCH better.
People are looking for stuff to complain about. Specifically, I think some people have an issue with Freeman that for the life of me I cannot figure out.