I think it's safe to say you're well past me in terms of baseball commitment. I refused to get sucked in at 8, 9 and most of 10. I did have to finally pull the trigger because rec ball is simply gutted. Every year a few more of the top players would bolt for their travel team. Most of my friends are following a blueprint similar to what you described. And I know coaches are always dealing with parents pushing for more tournaments, which is wild to me. If you play 9 tournaments in a year, that's 18 days of play with a minimum 72 games played and up to 90.
Add in practices and that is plenty of work for a kid to develop.
The one thing I'm adamant about is that my kids are the drivers. I'll help push, I'll buy the gas, I'll rotate tires, etc. I'm happy to support them in their pursuits with my time and resources. If they are no longer the ones making the decisions, there is a good chance their love for the activity will wane. I want them to be driven and find the fire inside. I think that is very difficult with someone saying 'you must do this'.
I want the love of the game to be the initial driver, then the grind/sacrifice/effort is much more manageable. THIS is what will determine if they are still doing the activity in 6 years. I'm not trying to have the best 12 year old player in the city. I want my kids to always be pushing to be better than they were yesterday.
I'll say this: it's a tightrope. I'm encouraging them often but some days, they just don't want to do "x" and I allow that as well. My kids still like cartoons and have stuffed animals and like making forts. I'm sure my level of "persistent pressure" will grow as they get older but I'm doing my best to hold myself in check because it would be very easy for me to "optimize" their schedule for maximal development but I think it'd rob them of finding incremental ways of improving down the road.
@Wild Bill - I appreciate you sharing and I hope you're comfortable with me pointing out the differences. This can be a very touchy subject as everyone wants what is best for their kids. I hope your son thrives and is one of the kids that resonates with your approach. I'll continue by cobbling this parenting thing together while searching for the instruction manual.
VDP, I'm pretty much in line with your thinking here. No offense to anyone else, but I've seen youth sports totally ruined by these new models. My wife and I support our kids in what they choose to do, but we also aren't nudging them in any one direction. The harsh truth is that most of these kids won't play in college or beyond. Hell, in our district, my kids likely won't even play varsity level in high school. Sports are an amazing thing to partake in as a kid. But it's not the be-all-end-all that a lot of families have made it into. Play the game, have fun, make friends, learn life lessons, and move on.
We have in-laws who are die hards in their athletic endeavors through their kids. We've seen it completely take over their lives. They don't seem to like it, but will say, "What are we supposed to do? This is just how it is if your kids wants to play." Which is sad. I keep this part to myself when it's discussed, but I feel pretty strongly that their oldest son sacrificed his college education by choosing his school ENTIRELY based on where he could play baseball and ended up at a NAIA school. Money isn't a factor for this family, yet baseball ruled the decision making. Not to say that he'll be a complete failure or anything. It's just that whenever college lists were made, it was only small level baseball schools. I didn't understand that mindset.
Our daughter is in gymnastics. It's ultra competitive and we've already felt the pressure of not wanting her to fall behind. For me though, it's more about not wanting her to fall behind and then get separated from her friends. It has nothing to do with skill level and wanting her to be the best, etc etc. I know she'll make new friends. She's 10 and goes to a huge school. But I get it....as a parent...you just want them to be happy.
My son is 6. He just finished up rec soccer and before the season even ended, we were being approached with signing him up for the next level. We said no to it and signed him up for baseball in the fall and basketball in the winter. He's pretty good at baseball already and shows a pretty strong passion for it. But he's just a 6 year old, athletic kid who wants to play anything and everything, so we're letting him do that. If he chooses baseball as "his" sport, we'll have to evaluate the travel leagues around Indy. I'll support him, but won't push him. As a family, our summers have been family-focused with our own vacations and time spent at a family lake house. Both of our kids are already well-aware that summer involvement will directly impact their lake time and vacation time.
I played a ton of sports growing up. Rec, All-Star, AAU, Chet Waggoner Little League, etc. I don't ever remember it being as involved as it is for today's youth and their families. It's out of control.
When my two youngest played travel ball one had a great coach. He didn't care about winning as much as developing the kids. He was there to help the kids and made sure everyone got fair playing time. The other only cared about winning. He would drop kids in favor of a better player and didn't care about making sure every kid got to play a decent amount of time. Of course his kid played every inning. We passed on him. He was upset that we told him no thanks. He ended up skipping travel ball until the next year and went with another local team.
The ironic part........ Anyway the coach we passed on asked my son to sub one weekend. Given it was just this once we let him play. They were playing against the Indiana Bulls. Back then the Indian Bulls was the premier travel team program (don't know if it still is). After the double header, the Bulls coach asked the coach if my son and another player were interested in playing for them. lol
I'm on board with the mindset of choosing a team based on coaching style and goals. I hate the "winning is everything" mindset for these little kids. It's ridiculous.
The Bulls are still a premier team around Indy. As are the Midwest Canes. My 11 yr old nephew plays for the Canes' AA team and it sounds like they're about to move up to AAA soon. But just the other day, his dad was telling me that they've pigeonholed his son into being a first baseman and only that because no one else can play the position. Rather than spread kids around so they can learn new positions and grow their skill levels, the coach's focus is winning. They know that's what they signed up for though and are just okay with it. "If it's what it takes for him to play varsity baseball in high school and hope to have a shot at collegiate level, then that's what we're doing." Whatever floats your boat, I say.