wizards8507
Well-known member
- Messages
- 20,660
- Reaction score
- 2,661
The more I think about the timeline, the more I'm 100% on Manti's side. The main point that everyone is making against him is that he supposedly found out about the hoax on December 6 and then continued to talk about Lennay's death on December 8. There are two possible reasons for this, and either one is based on Manti telling the truth:
1. Manti may have still believed that Lennay existed and died of cancer, but that the "hoax" was this new person claiming to be Lennay alive. We don't know if Manti went straight to the conclusion that she was fake all along, or if he first thought she was real but someone was messing with him starting December 6.
2. Manti did figure out that the whole thing was a hoax on December 6, but was advised to let the situation play out and not let on that he figured it out. This wasn't done for media attention. It was done because there was a chance that this hoax led to criminal activity in the form of extortion, and any attorneys involved would have wanted to let the criminals bury themselves before spilling the beans that they had it figured out.
1. Manti may have still believed that Lennay existed and died of cancer, but that the "hoax" was this new person claiming to be Lennay alive. We don't know if Manti went straight to the conclusion that she was fake all along, or if he first thought she was real but someone was messing with him starting December 6.
2. Manti did figure out that the whole thing was a hoax on December 6, but was advised to let the situation play out and not let on that he figured it out. This wasn't done for media attention. It was done because there was a chance that this hoax led to criminal activity in the form of extortion, and any attorneys involved would have wanted to let the criminals bury themselves before spilling the beans that they had it figured out.