C
ColoradoIrish
Guest
Because racial profiling in the police force is a problem.It’s your implication in responding to Bua.
Bua : Police are dumb racists Trump supporters
You: Let me tell you a trauma story to respond and agree
Because racial profiling in the police force is a problem.It’s your implication in responding to Bua.
Bua : Police are dumb racists Trump supporters
You: Let me tell you a trauma story to respond and agree
Like I said previously I'm not defending the guy, but isn't the whole premise of saying he's deportable based on some saying he's a member of ms-13? Which has been refuted to the best of my knowledge
I've seen so much contradicting info regarding that that's why I was asking. Like I said not defending the guy, just trying to defend our systems of checks and balances
So you agree with Bua… to my point.Because racial profiling in the police force is a problem.
![]()
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 Gang member with a History of Violence | Homeland Security
The mainstream media has peddled a sob story about Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The facts are he is an illegal alien from El Salvador, a MS-13 gang member, and has a history of violence.www.dhs.gov
No I don't agree with everything he said. From personal experience I can confidently say there's a difference between being racist and racial profilingSo you agree with Bua… to my point.
Would people be OK living next to "not a real member", only an associate/probationary member of MS-13. I guess the Dem's are correct that he was not a "member".
That's not the point of the tweet. It's pointing out the administration(again) doesn't even have a coherent view on this based on their own "evidence"...which the author of the tweet even calls dubious. The admin is claiming that Garcia is a leader of MS-13 when that's not even what their own shit evidence claims.Would people be OK living next to "not a real member", only an associate/probationary member of MS-13. I guess the Dem's are correct that he was not a "member".
Hey...fuck you!No I don't agree with everything he said
The point of the article seemed to imply that there was a judicial process.The issue is the lack of checks and balances and skipping the whole judicial process. Again not defending the guy
Would people be OK living next to "not a real member", only an associate/probationary member of MS-13. I guess the Dem's are correct that he was not a "member".
This administration deported somebody. They disagree with it. That’s about it.I haven't followed this case closely. Maybe there's something I'm missing.
The point of the article seemed to imply that there was a judicial process.
I'm starting to notice a pattern here.I haven't followed this case closely.
Holy shit. This covers it all."found by an immigration judge to be a member of a criminal gang now designated a terrorist organization, and that judge’s finding was upheld on appeal."
The point of the article seemed to imply that there was a judicial process.
"found by an immigration judge to be a member of a criminal gang now designated a terrorist organization, and that judge’s finding was upheld on appeal."
I haven't followed this case closely. Maybe there's something I'm missing.
Here is a fun story just now… like I’m typing this in the parking lot. I was just at a Michigan court house pulling a record for DHS. A cop asked to see my badge and I said no… because he has nothing to do with anything. He said he has full authority to detain me to see who I am. I ignored him and he called another officer over. I called my security team which then called their agency and told them to stand down and leave me alone. They did and I made sure to tell them goodbye when I left. Cops are sometimes assholes, equal opportunity assholes.No I don't agree with everything he said. From personal experience I can confidently say there's a difference between being racist and racial profiling
I tried to absorb the legal document, but frankly it's confusing. Everything in the linked document seemed to revolve around complaints from those representing the defendant that there was no "proof" that he was a gang member. The whole thing seems to revolve around the fact that a confidential informant identified him as a gang member/associate. Evidently the immigration judge found that sufficient. The appellate judge evidently found it sufficient.Adobe Acrobat
acrobat.adobe.com
That court case seems to refute him being a member of ms-13 that's why I said I've seen conflicting reports
I don't disagree. It goes back to my whole thing about more training for them.Here is a fun story just now… like I’m typing this in the parking lot. I was just at a Michigan court house pulling a record for DHS. A cop asked to see my badge and I said no… because he has nothing to do with anything. He said he has full authority to detain me to see who I am. I ignored him and he called another officer over. I called my security team which then called their agency and told them to stand down and leave me alone. They did and I made sure to tell them goodbye when I left. Cops are sometimes assholes to everyone, equal opportunity assholes.
It’s a bit complicated, because it is an article II court rather than an article III court. But precedent is that federal courts have oversight over executive courtsThe issue is the lack of checks and balances and skipping the whole judicial process. Again not defending the guy
but frankly it's confusing.
This is incorrect. Abrego was eventually released as his case went nowhere.Evidently the immigration judge found that sufficient. The appellate judge evidently found it sufficient.
Logic. We got Brittany Griner out of a Russian gulag when she had actually committed an offense in Russia. I'm sure the US government could lean on El Salvador to get someone who hasn't committed any crime and was deported by accident.But how can you prove that?
I honestly don’t think that would be the solution. When you give someone a sense of authority, they tend to try to exude the authority. Power is like a drug and some people try to exude their power where it does not belong to feel more powerful. To be fair, I am credentialed by many agencies so I carry many different badges. I’d be lying if there was not some sort of sense of power or authority behind those badges. I don’t abuse it and let the badges speak for themselves, but I could easily ruin someone’s day and be an asshole. I just choose not to, but some do.I don't disagree. It goes back to my whole thing about more training for them
There's so many factors that are involved. It would be dumb to limit it to one thing. I wasn't trying to imply that at all. It's a sensitive subject that I think everyone would like to see improved uponI honestly don’t think that would be the solution. When you give someone a sense of authority, they tend to try to exude the authority. Power is like a drug and some people try to exude their power where it does not belong to feel more powerful. To be fair, I am credentialed by many agencies so I carry many different badges. I’d be lying if there was not some sort of sense of power or authority behind those badges. I don’t abuse it and let the badges speak for themselves, but I could easily ruin someone’s day and be an asshole. I just choose not to, but some do.
Again. Not true. There is an actual process to be followed to get his "withholding of removal status" rescinded AND an actual process to be followed to have him deported. There is a reason they are called "deportation proceedings". Neither were done. That's the exact opposite of "due process". The DOJ/Trump's own administration admit this due process was not followed because he was deported as a result of an "administrative error".....that error(among others): not following the process to rescind the withholding of removal status! (1)He's had due process.
Hes reportable based on being an illegal immigrant. I believe he was sent to this place on gang allegations (i think).Like I said previously I'm not defending the guy, but isn't the whole premise of saying he's deportable based on some saying he's a member of ms-13? Which has been refuted to the best of my knowledge