Immigration

C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
I don't know if it's really been refuted.

From the article:
I've seen so much contradicting info regarding that that's why I was asking. Like I said not defending the guy, just trying to defend our systems of checks and balances
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
It’s your implication in responding to Bua.

Bua : Police are dumb racists Trump supporters

You: Let me tell you a trauma story to respond and agree
Because racial profiling in the police force is a problem.
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459
Like I said previously I'm not defending the guy, but isn't the whole premise of saying he's deportable based on some saying he's a member of ms-13? Which has been refuted to the best of my knowledge
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
I've seen so much contradicting info regarding that that's why I was asking. Like I said not defending the guy, just trying to defend our systems of checks and balances

It's been refuted.

Pretty reliably as well.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest

Like I said conflicting reports
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
Would people be OK living next to "not a real member", only an associate/probationary member of MS-13. I guess the Dem's are correct that he was not a "member".

 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Would people be OK living next to "not a real member", only an associate/probationary member of MS-13. I guess the Dem's are correct that he was not a "member".


The issue is the lack of checks and balances and skipping the whole judicial process. Again not defending the guy
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
Would people be OK living next to "not a real member", only an associate/probationary member of MS-13. I guess the Dem's are correct that he was not a "member".
That's not the point of the tweet. It's pointing out the administration(again) doesn't even have a coherent view on this based on their own "evidence"...which the author of the tweet even calls dubious. The admin is claiming that Garcia is a leader of MS-13 when that's not even what their own shit evidence claims.

There is nothing substantial, tangible, or of evidentiary value that ties Garcia to MS-13.

One would think that if he was such a high ranking member of MS-13...or a member at all...they'd have more evidence to this claim than a highly dubious and unsupported Home Depot arrest from six years ago. Did he...just..like..retire? What kind of pension does MS-13 offer?
 
Last edited:

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
The issue is the lack of checks and balances and skipping the whole judicial process. Again not defending the guy
The point of the article seemed to imply that there was a judicial process.

"found by an immigration judge to be a member of a criminal gang now designated a terrorist organization, and that judge’s finding was upheld on appeal."

I haven't followed this case closely. Maybe there's something I'm missing.
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
The point of the article seemed to imply that there was a judicial process.
I haven't followed this case closely.
I'm starting to notice a pattern here.

"found by an immigration judge to be a member of a criminal gang now designated a terrorist organization, and that judge’s finding was upheld on appeal."
Holy shit. This covers it all.

 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
The point of the article seemed to imply that there was a judicial process.

"found by an immigration judge to be a member of a criminal gang now designated a terrorist organization, and that judge’s finding was upheld on appeal."

I haven't followed this case closely. Maybe there's something I'm missing.

That court case seems to refute him being a member of ms-13 that's why I said I've seen conflicting reports
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459
No I don't agree with everything he said. From personal experience I can confidently say there's a difference between being racist and racial profiling
Here is a fun story just now… like I’m typing this in the parking lot. I was just at a Michigan court house pulling a record for DHS. A cop asked to see my badge and I said no… because he has nothing to do with anything. He said he has full authority to detain me to see who I am. I ignored him and he called another officer over. I called my security team which then called their agency and told them to stand down and leave me alone. They did and I made sure to tell them goodbye when I left. Cops are sometimes assholes, equal opportunity assholes.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532

That court case seems to refute him being a member of ms-13 that's why I said I've seen conflicting reports
I tried to absorb the legal document, but frankly it's confusing. Everything in the linked document seemed to revolve around complaints from those representing the defendant that there was no "proof" that he was a gang member. The whole thing seems to revolve around the fact that a confidential informant identified him as a gang member/associate. Evidently the immigration judge found that sufficient. The appellate judge evidently found it sufficient.

The issue appears to be that they screwed up in deporting him specifically to El Salvador. There was an immigration judge's order that stated that they couldn't. It looks like they could've deported him to absolutely anyplace other than El Salvador.

Now that he has been deported to El Salvador, the judge has issued a confusing ambiguous order that the US Government needs to put forth some level of effort to try to get him returned to the US.

I do think it's likely that if Trump really pressed for his return, El Salvador would comply. But how can you prove that?
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Here is a fun story just now… like I’m typing this in the parking lot. I was just at a Michigan court house pulling a record for DHS. A cop asked to see my badge and I said no… because he has nothing to do with anything. He said he has full authority to detain me to see who I am. I ignored him and he called another officer over. I called my security team which then called their agency and told them to stand down and leave me alone. They did and I made sure to tell them goodbye when I left. Cops are sometimes assholes to everyone, equal opportunity assholes.
I don't disagree. It goes back to my whole thing about more training for them.

Like I said I fully believe there's a difference between racist cops and racial profiling.
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
but frankly it's confusing.
:ROFLMAO:

Evidently the immigration judge found that sufficient. The appellate judge evidently found it sufficient.
This is incorrect. Abrego was eventually released as his case went nowhere.

If he was a danger to the community and a known gang member/leader, do you think the court releases him?

One would think that if he was such a high ranking member of MS-13...or a member at all...they'd have more evidence to this claim than a highly dubious and unsupported Home Depot arrest from six years ago.(That even the judge in 2019 found dubious) Did he...just..like..retire? What kind of pension does MS-13 offer?

Many times as bond hearings the evidentiary standard is flipped and leans towards you having to prove your innocence re: the charge at hand rather than the state having to prove their case. Courts tend to side with the state/government re: bond more often than not.

But how can you prove that?
Logic. We got Brittany Griner out of a Russian gulag when she had actually committed an offense in Russia. I'm sure the US government could lean on El Salvador to get someone who hasn't committed any crime and was deported by accident.
 
Last edited:

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459
I don't disagree. It goes back to my whole thing about more training for them
I honestly don’t think that would be the solution. When you give someone a sense of authority, they tend to try to exude the authority. Power is like a drug and some people try to exude their power where it does not belong to feel more powerful. To be fair, I am credentialed by many agencies so I carry many different badges. I’d be lying if there was not some sort of sense of power or authority behind those badges. I don’t abuse it and let the badges speak for themselves, but I could easily ruin someone’s day and be an asshole. I just choose not to, but some do.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
I honestly don’t think that would be the solution. When you give someone a sense of authority, they tend to try to exude the authority. Power is like a drug and some people try to exude their power where it does not belong to feel more powerful. To be fair, I am credentialed by many agencies so I carry many different badges. I’d be lying if there was not some sort of sense of power or authority behind those badges. I don’t abuse it and let the badges speak for themselves, but I could easily ruin someone’s day and be an asshole. I just choose not to, but some do.
There's so many factors that are involved. It would be dumb to limit it to one thing. I wasn't trying to imply that at all. It's a sensitive subject that I think everyone would like to see improved upon
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
Excellent Video summarizing things. Again, in this particular case. He's had due process. The Venezuelan's not so much.

 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
He's had due process.
Again. Not true. There is an actual process to be followed to get his "withholding of removal status" rescinded AND an actual process to be followed to have him deported. There is a reason they are called "deportation proceedings". Neither were done. That's the exact opposite of "due process". The DOJ/Trump's own administration admit this due process was not followed because he was deported as a result of an "administrative error".....that error(among others): not following the process to rescind the withholding of removal status! (1)

To top it all off:

He's currently sitting in a prison in El Salvador and he has no criminal record. (2)

Bring him back, initiate deportation proceedings, follow the appropriate steps..and if he is eligible for deportation and ends up being deported..so be it. Do things the right way. Also, if he is deported to El Salvador..or anywhere else...that doesn't mean he ends up in a prison for life when he has committed no crime. He would be more than free to self deport and go live freely in another country.
 
Last edited:

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
There is also an argument that Abrego (and frankly a ton of others) could have made during his deportation hearing(you know..due process) under the Conventions Against Torture. The US is duty bound under CAT to not deport someone to a country where they are in danger of being tortured. Abrego was granted his withholding of removal status primarily/in part because of threats against his family in El Salvador & CECOT is one of the world's most notoriously torture-ridden prisons.

So again, these are all parts of the due process that should have been carried out and weren't.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,701
Reaction score
6,001
Like I said previously I'm not defending the guy, but isn't the whole premise of saying he's deportable based on some saying he's a member of ms-13? Which has been refuted to the best of my knowledge
Hes reportable based on being an illegal immigrant. I believe he was sent to this place on gang allegations (i think).

If for whatever reason he is brought back, I believe the plan is to put him on a plane again. He's not going to be living in the US, if I understand correctly.
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,724
Are we still defending the wife beating, human trafficking gang member who illegally entered our country?
 
Top