ab2cmiller
Troublemaker in training
- Messages
- 11,457
- Reaction score
- 8,536
I agree that there are people with a pathological need to draw attention to themselves on the internet.
lmao
I agree that there are people with a pathological need to draw attention to themselves on the internet.
I agree that there are people with a pathological need to draw attention to themselves on the internet.
I agree that there are people with a pathological need to draw attention to themselves on the internet.
Learned the hard way this morning that liquor stores in Indiana now don't open until noon and everything is curb side service. You have to call your order in ahead of time then go pick it up. Supposedly, they'll have it ready and waiting to collect $$$ outside upon your arrival. Shit's getting way too complicated...
Maybe, but I don't think he'd be facing the same odds as the larger pool of people. He's not dumb and works in healthcare, he knows better than to go in unless things are serious.
I think the reason we see 80% negative tests are because there are far too many people with "nothing better to do". They want to test positive because they can get on facebook and get the spotlight for a couple of weeks.
There are more and more people with meaningless lives that want to be part of something.
Testing positive and "surviving" a virus might be their life's work.
Having a large portion of the public get tested is quintessential to stopping the virus. You can not deny that having access to more information about the spread is crucial. I highly doubt anyone feels the urge to go into a disease ridden place where if they're not careful could contact the virus if they didn't already have it.
It's annoying to see people post about having the coronavirus, but rather them than you. This is one of the times where being a busy body actually helps the general public.
You’re right about the point that we need data...and more of it. The more data the epidemiologists have, the more they can accurately project what may be around the corner.
I hate that the current projections (the IMHE from UW seems to be getting the latest attention now) come to an abrupt stop in August. Everyone is expecting a 2nd wave but we don’t have enough data to confirm 100%. Then...if there is a 2nd wave, will the US have stockpiled enough PPE/ventilators/ICUs to avoid the threat of overwhelming the system?
If we do...that’s great and maybe we can avoid a full ceasing of the economy. Of course, the 2nd wave that most Americans may be dreading is the latter half of 2020 when unemployment is at high double digit numbers, stimulus (rescue) checks are being delayed for months b/c the system is overwhelmed & businesses are shuttering faster than the death rate of the 1st wave of COVID-19.
The three COVID-19 stimulus bills that Congress has passed provide additional funding for hospitals and for free coronavirus testing for the uninsured through Medicaid. While Congress did not allocate any money specifically for COVID-19 treatment or coverage for the uninsured, President Trump has stated his intention to reimburse hospitals for treating the uninsured by tapping a new $100 billion in funding for hospitals and other health care entities included in the third stimulus, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The legislation provided little detail about how funding would be distributed, giving significant discretion to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
To date, few specifics on the new policy for covering COVID-19 treatment costs of uninsured patients have been released, but administration officials have said that hospitals would get reimbursed at Medicare rates, which are substantially lower than prices paid by private insurers. The administration has not provided any cost estimates for this new policy, other than to say that the funding will come from the $100 billion in the CARES Act. How much of that funding will be used to pay for care for the uninsured is an important part of thinking through the implications of this policy. In this brief, we estimate a range of costs for reimbursing hospitals for treatment of COVID-19 for the uninsured and discuss some outstanding questions about the Trump administration’s new policy. (cont)
Serious question - do you get off on posting all this doom and gloom constantly?
Who’s to say that a large percentage of these folks who lost their job recently don’t become employed again in the coming weeks/months?
I know it sucks right now, but damn dude, let’s quit crying in our Cheerios constantly and maybe think about what we are going to do to learn from this, find ways to solve our problems, and make our lives better. Anybody can sit there and complain about a problem, the hard part is having a positive attitude in the face of adversity and being willing to do something about it.
Serious question - do you get off on posting all this doom and gloom constantly?
Who’s to say that a large percentage of these folks who lost their job recently don’t become employed again in the coming weeks/months?
I know it sucks right now, but damn dude, let’s quit crying in our Cheerios constantly and maybe think about what we are going to do to learn from this, find ways to solve our problems, and make our lives better. Anybody can sit there and complain about a problem, the hard part is having a positive attitude in the face of adversity and being willing to do something about it.
Almost everyone I know filing for unemployment right now in the NKY area has been placed on furlough, rather than laid off.
Of course there's the chance that some of those people don't actually get their jobs back, or that the downturn ultimately results in 'real' layoffs down the line... but it's encouraging to see that so many employers in the area are planning on a return to normalcy with promises of getting people back to work as they were before.
My real question is how many companies are going to realize the money they can save on space and operating costs by having people work remotely on the regular from their own space, rather than footing the bill for large office buildings or other rented space.
I feel like many companies are going to downgrade their square footage and look for smaller offices as meeting spaces for in-person needs, and keep people working from home otherwise. They might be spending more on increased IT support and other WFH tech, but they'll save on rent and utilities.
I've seen many idiots online with just alleged symptoms, haven't even gotten to a test, go on social media and do the "OMG look at me".
The older I get, the more I realize there's a higher population of dumb, attention seeking people who are easily influenced than I ever knew.
It is different state by state but if you really want a test, you'll find a way to get one.
The job loss numbers predicted by the St.Louis Fed are pretty staggering - project total employment reductions of 47 million, which would translate to a 32.1% unemployment rate.
Unemployment claims typically lag behind the figures, but the last two weeks have seen 10 million people lose their jobs. Roughly half of all U.S. workers receive health insurance through their own employer’s provided coverage.
A recent model (see link below) projects job loss based on a Low scenario assumes 12 million people lose jobs and employer insurance with a 10% unemployment rate; Medium: 23 million, 17.5% unemployment; High: 35 million, 25% unemployment We are at the low scenario already.
Many laid off American workers will be able to get health insurance in other ways - Medicaid is one of the primary sources.
Pre-COVID - the uninsured amounted to 29 million with 3% unemployment
At the High scenario, 23 million of the 35 million laid off people who had private health insurance through their employer will be on Medicaid. But the uninsured will increase from the 29 million pre-Covid to 39-40 million in that High scenario.
COVID-19 Impact on Medicaid, Marketplace, and the Uninsured, by State
Others may get insurance on a family member's plan, or through a state exchange. Few will pay the full price for COBRA. The President has decided not to have a special open enrollment period for the ACA, which he could do, and will continue to support the lawsuit ending the ACA, which will be heard before the Supreme Court in Oct. Prior to the ACA (2013), 44 million Americans did not have any health insurance.
I agree that there are people with a pathological need to draw attention to themselves on the internet.
Reps, lots of reps
I did my part!
First the president does not need "have a special open enrollment period" as anyone losing employer paid insurance because their employment was terminated can obtain insurance because they have experienced a "life changing event". Surprised you were not aware of this.
Second, Not sure what you mean when stating "Few will pay the full price for COBRA". It has been my experience that policies under COBRA are (1) better then policies that can be purchased via the exchanges and (2) are less expensive.
This is normal and good, right?
![]()
First, that federal enrollment exception is in the ACA, but it is up to the President. Trump has rejected the ACA Special Enrollment period.
Apr 1, 2020,06:22pm EDT
Trump Rejects ACA Special Enrollment Period Amid Coronavirus Pandemic
(Forbes)
So, only those states who run their own exchanges can have those special enrollment periods. Twelve state-run their own exchanges. Eleven - all but Idaho - have opened their state-run exchanges for those seeking health insurance. For the other thirty-eight states, if you did not sign up in the federal exchange, you will have to wait until Nov.
Second, COBRA has good coverage, but the employee who chooses COBRA must pay the entire cost of their health insurance - theirs and their employer's cost. Few who are suddenly unemployed can afford this.
If you leave your job for any reason and lose your job-based insurance, you can buy a Marketplace plan. Losing job-based coverage, even if you quit or get fired, qualifies you for a Special Enrollment Period. This means you can buy insurance outside the yearly Open Enrollment Period.
Serious question.... are u trolling?MJ is totally correct. Frankly, I have no idea what your are trying to say. This is from the Healthcare.Gov website.
https://www.healthcare.gov/have-job-based-coverage/if-you-lose-job-based-coverage/
Having a large portion of the public get tested is quintessential to stopping the virus. You can not deny that having access to more information about the spread is crucial. I highly doubt anyone feels the urge to go into a disease ridden place where if they're not careful could contact the virus if they didn't already have it.
It's annoying to see people post about having the coronavirus, but rather them than you. This is one of the times where being a busy body actually helps the general public.
Do u copy and paste?.You're problem is you're a rational adult. Unfortunately there are far more half-life clowns who live on social media and seek attention because their life/work/purpose is meaningless.
Except in this case where those test kits are scarce and should be reserved for the truly sick.
If 80% are testing false and the Prior Auth is "bring critixally sick", WTF do they actually have (rhetorical).
COBRA is universally known to be much more expensive coverage. As to the Obamacare exception, it is limited to 60 days but are you seriously arguing that if people get fired they always have a low cost, quality option in Obamacare to fall back on? What is the word coming to?Serious question.... are u trolling?
Do u copy and paste?.