The smoking gun is coming any day now....any.....day.........nowSo you can't give a reasonable answer as to why, other than influence peddling and corruption, all that money got funneled to the Bidens? Do you think it was just innocent, no expectations, giving money to a VP's or POTUS's family with no strings attached? Seriously? You're defending a corrupt politician. You're saying it's OK as long as he's from your party.
I didn't ask you about a smoking gun. I asked you to give a reasonable explanation for why foreign businesses and persons closely associated with foreign governments would pay ridiculous amounts for mediocre art by the VP/P's son, pay him millions to sit on the board of foreign businesses in fields he has absolutely zero expertise, wire large amounts of money to him, and give millions more to the rest of the family if it's not a way to funnel money to "The Big Guy" for the buying & selling of influence. You can't. We all know exactly what it is and you're defending a corrupt politician just because he's a member of your preferred party.The smoking gun is coming any day now....any.....day.........now
Lol, it was āallegedlyā in the dumpster remember?The smoking gun is coming any day now....any.....day.........now
I recognize youāve connected the dots of money from people trying to influence to the Bidenās and see that the Bidenās did talk to those people, supposedly about the weather, and that people saw it who were involved and weāve seen people who gave to the Bidens avoid sanctions and prosecutors. But really, until we have a video with audio of him doing it, is it even real?I didn't ask you about a smoking gun. I asked you to give a reasonable explanation for why foreign businesses and persons closely associated with foreign governments would pay ridiculous amounts for mediocre art by the VP/P's son, pay him millions to sit on the board of foreign businesses in fields he has absolutely zero expertise, wire large amounts of money to him, and give millions more to the rest of the family if it's not a way to funnel money to "The Big Guy" for the buying & selling of influence. You can't. We all know exactly what it is and you're defending a corrupt politician just because he's a member of your preferred party.
I mean, it's not 14-year-old Russian hookers peeing on an American businessman and presidential candidate for real for real, but it's kinda real.I recognize youāve connected the dots of money from people trying to influence to the Bidenās and see that the Bidenās did talk to those people, supposedly about the weather, and that people saw it who were involved and weāve seen people who gave to the Bidens avoid sanctions and prosecutors. But really, until we have a video with audio of him doing it, is it even real?
The data means this is really good.But weāre better off than the other G7 countries.
But weāre better off than the other G7 countries.
I'll take "Missing the point for $200" Alex.The data means this is really good.
Been asking myself the same question. lol
Is today the day? Is there evidence that Biden received any money? Any evidence he performed or asked for a favor?I didn't ask you about a smoking gun. I asked you to give a reasonable explanation for why foreign businesses and persons closely associated with foreign governments would pay ridiculous amounts for mediocre art by the VP/P's son, pay him millions to sit on the board of foreign businesses in fields he has absolutely zero expertise, wire large amounts of money to him, and give millions more to the rest of the family if it's not a way to funnel money to "The Big Guy" for the buying & selling of influence. You can't. We all know exactly what it is and you're defending a corrupt politician just because he's a member of your preferred party.
You won't get anything but a no comment until we have TMZ tape of him watching the money hit the bank.You're working very hard to avoid answering my questions.
You won't get anything but a no comment until we have TMZ tape of him watching the money hit the bank.
Is today the day? Is today the day you admit that Russia Collusion was a hoax?Is today the day? Is there evidence that Biden received any money? Any evidence he performed or asked for a favor?
No?
Maybe tomorrow.

My thought as well after seeing the look on his face.I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't know about it and his next question to his handlers was "what's going on in Hawaii?"
I have presented much evidence that it was not a hoax.Is today the day? Is today the day you admit that Russia Collusion was a hoax?
No?
Maybe tomorrow![]()
I have answered them in hereYou're working very hard to avoid answering my questions.
I have presented much evidence that it was not a hoax.
Still waiting on the blowhard to do his part.
Or better yet...do you have any evidence of what the blowhard is claiming. Step up and be heard if you do...please
i can't find anywhere you've answered them. Could you point out where you have, please?I have answered them in here
Cause you are wrong?I'm just waiting for the true blues around here to admit Russia Collusion was a hoax. If you can't admit that why should anyone GAF what you have to say about any other supposed corruption?
LOL - ask him if 14 year old Russian hookers peed on Trump on tape, they "know" that for a fact. It was repeated on multiple new channels so it must be true. But Hunter's laptop is Russian disinformation you socialist simp. You don't have any proof of that!i can't find anywhere you've answered them. Could you point out where you have, please?
i can't find anywhere you've answered them. Could you point out where you have, please?
Lol, what kind of response is this? People paid to have a meal with a politician!!???
This never ever happens...like never ever ever.
You don't know much about the Obama Presidency if you think Biden was making foreign policy decisions as a vice president. He wasn't dick chaney
LOL - ask him if 14 year old Russian hookers peed on Trump on tape, they "know" that for a fact. It was repeated on multiple new channels so it must be true. But Hunter's laptop is Russian disinformation you socialist simp. You don't have any proof of that!
No evidence then, just "seems suspicious".
I almost feel bad for you. Like with Benghazi and Hillary's emails, you clearly have listened to and form your opinions from people that over promise about what evidence is actually there. Lefty grifters did the same thing with potential Trump crimes/corruption and you probably correctly called out the dubiousness of a lot of the evidence (Steele dossier anyone? Buehler?).
Maybe something will surface and your "any day now Joe is finished!" wishes will come true.
In the mean time I will continue to live in reality where Hunter Biden has only failed to pay taxes.
Is today the day? Is today the day you admit that Russia Collusion was a hoax?
No?
Maybe tomorrow![]()
This shit has been reported on....extensively.
The FBI probe start before the dossier. It started after an Australian government official heard G11 running his mouth at a bar. Not the dossier.
Here's what the GOP lead Senate Intelligence Committee investigations concluded...
"The findings, including unflinching characterizations of furtive interactions between Trump associates and Russian operatives, echo to a large degree those of special counsel Robert Muellerās Russia investigation and appear to repudiate the Republican presidentās claims that the FBI had no basis to investigate whether his campaign was conspiring with Russia. Trump has called the Russia investigations a āhoax.ā
Among the more striking sections of the report is the committeeās description of the professional relationship between former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik, whom the committee describes as a Russian intelligence officer.
āTaken as a whole, Manafortās high-level access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik, represented a grave counterintelligence threat,ā the report says.
"The report notes how Manafort shared internal Trump campaign polling data with Kilimnik and says there is āsome evidenceā Kilimnik may have been connected to Russiaās effort to hack and leak Democratic emails, though that information is redacted. The report also says ātwo pieces of informationā raise the possibility of Manafortās potential connection to those operations, but what follows is again blacked out."
![]()
Senate panel finds Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election
The report purposely does not come to a final conclusion, as the other reports did, about whether there is enough evidence that Trumpās campaign coordinated or colluded with Russia to sway the election, leaving its findings open to partisan interpretation.www.pbs.org
You ready to discuss this in good faith yet? Or just continue to lie?