Biden Presidency

[drayer54]

Don't @ me, I just saw this and thought it was funny.

We’re prob a month or less away from being told it doesn’t matter and of course he did all of this, because he cares about his son.

 

[jprue24]

We’re prob a month or less away from being told it doesn’t matter and of course he did all of this, because he cares about his son.

I see you picked up the Trump playbook about negative stuff.

 

[jprue24]

 

[Jiggafini19Deux]

The hearings so far have boiled down to a few "I saw," even more "Someone told me they saw," or most of all "Someone told me someone else saw" testimony.

Not a single actual link to the President has been produced.
Not a single bank deposit to the President has been produced.
Not a single President craft has been produced.
Not a single bit of President corruption has been produced.
Not a single bit of alien material was produced.
Not a single bit of President technology has been produced.
Not a single moment of inambiguous video of anything President has been produced.

In other words, all we got was days and days of unsubstantiated second and third hand claims without a single shred of physical evidence. This is the same endless claims without any actual evidence we've heard for decades years. It's just like The Curse Of Oak Island or The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch TV shows: a never-ending tease full of "This is it!" and "Finally, the proof!" and "Coming up next episode, we reveal all!" empty promises that never actually produce anything of genuine substance. This is why people like me are so skeptical and tired of being told "They're here! We've got proof but can't show it to you yet... but we're just about to!" Second and third hand testimony, unexplained connections or odd paintings, and nothing better than some blurry or grainy video isn't even remotely convincing in any scientific way. Show me the money. Until then, this is going to remain as serious and believable as Bigfoot and Nessie.

The truth is in the basement of a pizza parlor in Bethesda, Maryland.

 

[drayer54]

I see you picked up the Trump playbook about negative stuff.

Where did Trump do this?

 

[jprue24]

Where did Trump do this?

Keep in mind that we are comparing a vice president's influence to a president's. Quite a bit of difference there.

Since this is about the "kids".....His son in law received a 2 billion dollar investment from the MBS led Public Investment Fund - a contentious decision amongst the fund's board - shortly after his time in charge of middle east policy or ahead of his resumption of that roll in a future Trump precedency.

Before Giving Billions to Jared Kushner, Saudi Investment Fund Had Big Doubts (Published 2022)

Before committing $2 billion to Mr. Kushner’s fledgling firm, officials at a fund led by the Saudi crown prince questioned taking such a big risk.

www.nytimes.com

Two

Billion

Dollars

Kindly piss off with expecting me to care about a little bit of shady money smoke around a failson that tried to pedal influence to people dumb enough to buy it. ESPECIALLY after what factual event I described above. Also sort of ludacris for you guys to keep trying to milk this dry ass teet.

 

[sixstar]

This is the problem with a 2-party system. One side is okay with corruption because the other side is corrupt. Meanwhile, regular citizens are the real losers in this game, and to add insult to injury, they spend their time trying to defend their side's corruption when they aren't even the beneficiaries.

 

[drayer54]

Keep in mind that we are comparing a vice president's influence to a president's. Quite a bit of difference there.

Since this is about the "kids".....His son in law received a 2 billion dollar investment from the MBS led Public Investment Fund - a contentious decision amongst the fund's board - shortly after his time in charge of middle east policy or ahead of his resumption of that roll in a future Trump precedency.

Before Giving Billions to Jared Kushner, Saudi Investment Fund Had Big Doubts (Published 2022)

Before committing $2 billion to Mr. Kushner’s fledgling firm, officials at a fund led by the Saudi crown prince questioned taking such a big risk.

www.nytimes.com

Two

Billion

Dollars

Kindly piss off with expecting me to care about a little bit of shady money smoke around a failson that tried to pedal influence to people dumb enough to buy it. ESPECIALLY after what factual event I described above. Also sort of ludacris for you guys to keep trying to milk this dry ass teet.

The Vice President influence was good enough for Romanians, Ukrainians, Chinese, etc. to literally buy time with the VP and then work the influence they needed. This isn’t even comparable nor is it the same thing. The ludacris part to me is that a bunch of people do not care about the Biden’s making tons of money by selling direct access to the WH and influencing policy. I can’t imagine anyone serious can’t see this has been a Biden trend for over a decade. So clearly, they just don’t care. It’s corruption and it should be thrown in his face as long he keeps lying about it and the media tries to gloss over it.

The WH, media, and left will keep doing the “BUT TRUMP!” even though he isn’t in the WH and sure as heck didn’t do this. If evidence proves otherwise, Trump should be charged the same way Biden should be.

 

[drayer54]

This is the problem with a 2-party system. One side is okay with corruption because the other side is corrupt. Meanwhile, regular citizens are the real losers in this game, and to add insult to injury, they spend their time trying to defend their side's corruption when they aren't even the beneficiaries.

Except this isn’t a well you did it too. Biden is in his own category here and is the sitting President.

 

[Irish#1]

Keep in mind that we are comparing a vice president's influence to a president's. Quite a bit of difference there.

Since this is about the "kids".....His son in law received a 2 billion dollar investment from the MBS led Public Investment Fund - a contentious decision amongst the fund's board - shortly after his time in charge of middle east policy or ahead of his resumption of that roll in a future Trump precedency.

Before Giving Billions to Jared Kushner, Saudi Investment Fund Had Big Doubts (Published 2022)

Before committing $2 billion to Mr. Kushner’s fledgling firm, officials at a fund led by the Saudi crown prince questioned taking such a big risk.

www.nytimes.com

Two

Billion

Dollars

Kindly piss off with expecting me to care about a little bit of shady money smoke around a failson that tried to pedal influence to people dumb enough to buy it. ESPECIALLY after what factual event I described above. Also sort of ludacris for you guys to keep trying to milk this dry ass teet.

Just because Jared got that money doesn’t in one shape or another diminish or make it okay for Joe and son.

 

[jprue24]

The Vice President influence was good enough for Romanians, Ukrainians, Chinese, etc. to literally buy time with the VP and then work the influence they needed. This isn’t even comparable nor is it the same thing. The ludacris part to me is that a bunch of people do not care about the Biden’s making tons of money by selling direct access to the WH and influencing policy. I can’t imagine anyone serious can’t see this has been a Biden trend for over a decade. So clearly, they just don’t care. It’s corruption and it should be thrown in his face as long he keeps lying about it and the media tries to gloss over it.

The WH, media, and left will keep doing the “BUT TRUMP!” even though he isn’t in the WH and sure as heck didn’t do this. If evidence proves otherwise, Trump should be charged the same way Biden should be.

Lol, what kind of response is this? People paid to have a meal with a politician!!???

This never ever happens...like never ever ever.

You don't know much about the Obama Presidency if you think Biden was making foreign policy decisions as a vice president. He wasn't dick chaney

 

[jprue24]

Just because Jared got that money doesn’t in one shape or another diminish or make it okay for Joe and son.

Joe received money!? When did that evidence drop?

 

[drayer54]

Lol, what kind of response is this? People paid to have a meal with a politician!!???

This never ever happens...like never ever ever.

You don't know much about the Obama Presidency if you think Biden was making foreign policy decisions as a vice president. He wasn't dick chaney

Who got the Prosecutor fired????? Are you buying the "they talked about the weather" thing?

 

[jprue24]

As I have said before, getting rid of that prosecutor was US (and other western nation's) foreign policy. The prosecutor was choosing to not continue or pursue corruption investigations.

If Biden was making foreign policy decisions (there is literally zero evidence of this) with the benefit of Burisma in mind....You think firing a prosecutor that wasn't investigating Burisma is proof that he was in Burisma's pocket?


Fucking nonsense.

 

[Bishop2b5]

That you think multiple foreign entities funneling millions of dollars to the sitting VP/POTUS's shady crackhead son and other family members over the past decade plus is just buying an opportunity to have an innocent lunch with Joe or done just out of the goodness of their hearts is amazingly gullible and humorous. That you know what it actually means and are just blowing smoke to avoid admitting that Biden and his family are corrupt as hell and have been peddling access and influence is sad. Joe has been selling access and influence for ages. His corrupt crackhead son is the bagman. You know it. We know it. Everyone but the most blind and willfully ignorant "No Dems ever do anything wrong" nitwit knows it.

 

[jprue24]

That you think multiple foreign entities funneling millions of dollars to the sitting VP/POTUS's shady crackhead son and other family members over the past decade plus is just buying an opportunity to have an innocent lunch with Joe or done just out of the goodness of their hearts is amazingly gullible and humorous. That you know what it actually means and are just blowing smoke to avoid admitting that Biden and his family are corrupt as hell and have been peddling access and influence is sad. Joe has been selling access and influence for ages. His corrupt crackhead son is the bagman. You know it. We know it. Everyone but the most blind and willfully ignorant "No Dems ever do anything wrong" nitwit knows it.

Are you mistaking me for a cloud again?

 

[TorontoGold]

As I have said before, getting rid of that prosecutor was US (and other western nation's) foreign policy. The prosecutor was choosing to not continue or pursue corruption investigations.

If Biden was making foreign policy decisions (there is literally zero evidence of this) with the benefit of Burisma in mind....You think firing a prosecutor that wasn't investigating Burisma is proof that he was in Burisma's pocket?


Fucking nonsense.

Joe is an empty husk and a criminal mastermind! You can't follow that logic? Joe is secretly laundering money (don't look at his tax returns)!

I hope they finally stop Hunter Biden from his incredible influence on DC politics. His ultimate goal is to make crack legal and that should not be allowed to happen.

 

[Bishop2b5]

Are you mistaking me for a cloud again?

No, I'm calling you silly, gullible, or foolish. Take your pick. Several foreign entities have funneled millions of dollars to Biden via his son and other family members. You pretending that's nothing or irrelevant makes you silly, gullible, or foolish.

 

[SeekNDestroy]

Are you mistaking me for a cloud again?

 

[Bishop2b5]

Joe is an empty husk and a criminal mastermind! You can't follow that logic? Joe is secretly laundering money (don't look at his tax returns)!

I hope they finally stop Hunter Biden from his incredible influence on DC politics. His ultimate goal is to make crack legal and that should not be allowed to happen.

Ahh, the king of strawman replies rears his head. Yes, an empty husk is a criminal mastermind and the goal is to make crack legal. That's exactly what we've all said. No rewording there to make our points sound flimsy or silly. And you wonder why we make fun of you, call you the king of strawmen, dismiss you as snarky and vapid, and refer to all your replies as the Toronto Vortex. I'll let you in on a little secret: juvenile, giggling, snarky, strawman spinning is a very poor excuse for intelligent argument in the adult world. But you do you if that's all you're capable of.

 

[Bishop2b5]

 

[jprue24]

No, I'm calling you silly, gullible, or foolish. Take your pick. Several foreign entities have funneled millions of dollars to Biden via his son and other family members. You pretending that's nothing or irrelevant makes you silly, gullible, or foolish.

You have evidence that payments have gone to Biden? You should send it to Comer cause the GOP sure can't find them.

Come on man, show the proof that you are so sure exists.

You're the guy that backs up his opinions right? Back it up.

 

[jprue24]

Good. Given your track record on IE for believing nonsense and being impervious to facts, I'll take your learned judgement of my statement as a compliment.

How many times do you source your information?

How many times do I?

Opportunity is knocking! Don't miss this chance!

Pins are set up....knock them down with facts

 

[TorontoGold]

Ahh, the king of strawman replies rears his head. Yes, an empty husk is a criminal mastermind and the goal is to make crack legal. That's exactly what we've all said. No rewording there to make our points sound flimsy or silly. And you wonder why we make fun of you, call you the king of strawmen, dismiss you as snarky and vapid, and refer to all your replies as the Toronto Vortex. I'll let you in on a little secret: juvenile, giggling, snarky, strawman spinning is a very poor excuse for intelligent argument in the adult world. But you do you if that's all you're capable of.

Should I have used italics? Clearly my post was a joke.

You and the rest of the Apologist crew never can engage in any stat based arguments. You find comfort in the culture war safe space. I have made a point to engage with those that actually look at numbers sometimes. You are fully incapable of that and continue to only every share your narrow view on culture war topics. I encourage you to participate in discussions without using anecdotal or personal opinions. Back it up and show everyone that you're as smart as you claim to be. Oh no, I've been made fun of by a guy who sits in a culture war padded room, how will I ever recover. LMAO

 

[Bishop2b5]

You have evidence that payments have gone to Biden? You should send it to Comer cause the GOP sure can't find them.

Come on man, show the proof that you are so sure exists.

You're the guy that backs up his opinions right? Back it up.

You know that as a private citizen and not part of the government or any law enforcement agency, that I have no access to anyone's financial records or other info. What we on the Right have been complaining about is that the FBI and others that DO have access to all that have intentionally slow-walked their investigation into it, ignored blatantly obvious signs of corruption, dragged their heels, and looked the other way, all in an effort to not prosecute "their guy."

Tell me, why would any foreign entity buy mediocre paintings from a president's son for hundreds of thousands of dollars? Why would those entities put him on a board in a field he has ZERO experience in and pay him millions? Why would they funnel millions to Joe's family for no apparent reason? Why would they pay millions to the Biden family for a simple lunch with the president? You really think this is all just innocent? That they did this because they see a hidden talent in Hunter's art skills or just like giving millions to a president's family with no expectations of anything in return. We all know how this works in politics. It's the buying and selling of influence and access. Don't pretend to be unaware of what's happening and defend this corrupt nonsense. That's exactly how we get corrupt politicians: people accepting it and defending it because it's their guy.

 

[Bishop2b5]

Should I have used italics? Clearly my post was a joke.

None of us can tell the difference.

 

[TorontoGold]

None of us can tell the difference.

Despite my disagreements with #1, he does have a good sense of picking up on humour. He can give pointers.

 

[SeekNDestroy]

None of us can tell the difference.

It was pretty obviously said in jest. If you’re not sure whether crack legality is or isn’t a goal of the Biden administration then it might be time to take a break.

 

[jprue24]

You know that as a private citizen and not part of the government or any law enforcement agency, that I have no access to anyone's financial records or other info. What we on the Right have been complaining about is that the FBI and others that DO have access to all that have intentionally slow-walked their investigation into it, ignored blatantly obvious signs of corruption, dragged their heels, and looked the other way, all in an effort to not prosecute "their guy."

Tell me, why would any foreign entity buy mediocre paintings from a president's son for hundreds of thousands of dollars? Why would those entities put him on a board in a field he has ZERO experience in and pay him millions? Why would they funnel millions to Joe's family for no apparent reason? Why would they pay millions to the Biden family for a simple lunch with the president? You really think this is all just innocent? That they did this because they see a hidden talent in Hunter's art skills or just like giving millions to a president's family with no expectations of anything in return. We all know how this works in politics. It's the buying and selling of influence and access. Don't pretend to be unaware of what's happening and defend this corrupt nonsense. That's exactly how we get corrupt politicians: people accepting it and defending it because it's their guy.

No evidence then, just "seems suspicious".

I almost feel bad for you. Like with Benghazi and Hillary's emails, you clearly have listened to and form your opinions from people that over promise about what evidence is actually there. Lefty grifters did the same thing with potential Trump crimes/corruption and you probably correctly called out the dubiousness of a lot of the evidence (Steele dossier anyone? Buehler?).

Maybe something will surface and your "any day now Joe is finished!" wishes will come true.

In the mean time I will continue to live in reality where Hunter Biden has only failed to pay taxes.

 

[Bishop2b5]

No evidence then, just "seems suspicious".

I almost feel bad for you. Like with Benghazi and Hillary's emails, you clearly have listened to and form your opinions from people that over promise about what evidence is actually there. Lefty grifters did the same thing with potential Trump crimes/corruption and you probably correctly called out the dubiousness of a lot of the evidence (Steele dossier anyone? Buehler?).

Maybe something will surface and your "any day now Joe is finished!" wishes will come true.

In the mean time I will continue to live in reality where Hunter Biden has only failed to pay taxes.

So you can't give a reasonable answer as to why, other than influence peddling and corruption, all that money got funneled to the Bidens? Do you think it was just innocent, no expectations, giving money to a VP's or POTUS's family with no strings attached? Seriously? You're defending a corrupt politician. You're saying it's OK as long as he's from your party.