Domina Nostra
Well-known member
- Messages
- 6,251
- Reaction score
- 1,388
There certainly are gamers! But I agree with Freeman that practice matters because it builds faith in coaches, and coaches are who decide who plays.
lol those quotes should go well for the kelly haters among us.
How you practice matters.
Almost like that particular complaint was always stupid.....lol
I see MF points, but on one hand he says there is no such thing as a "gamer" and/or "practice player" then he discusses Mayer as the ultimate practice player. It is all silly coach speak for being more consistent. You know who is consistent...JD Bertrand...consistently slow at getting to the ball. If he doesn't diagnosis the play immediately, it is too late.
All jokes aside Kollie's speed stood out in a big way on that QB sack. We need more of that. Period.
These next two weeks should be a great opportunity to get Kollie some more game reps.
Correct, he said there is no such thing as a "gamer." Conversely, that would mean there would be no such thing as a "practice player."He didn’t say there is no such thing as a practice player. That’s what he was endorsing as a thing.
Mayer practices well so he plays well on game day. Kollie has been challenged to practice well to continue to play both more and well on game day.
You can be a star in practice, but when the lights go on your either a gamer or not.I think gamers absolutely exist, and I think Pyne is one of them.
Read this and shit my drawers.Prince has been charged with upping his game during the week so the coaches can up his game(time) on Saturday. He knows what to do, now just do it and earn those minutes PK. We all want to see you out there, do what the coaches ask and start building your legacy here.
Agree. I think that’s what MF is trying to convey, “I want you out there, show me by your work you want to be out there.”Prince must be the guy moving forward.
Bertrand and Marist isn't working. We're halfway into the season and the LB play hasn't gotten better.
CristBoth of these terms have subtleties and shouldn't be loosely talked about (especially willy nilly all over the place) without a strong definition of what the heck is in discussion.
Example: for some people, the concept of a "gamer" is a high-ceiling talent who is lazy, doesn't practice hard, is more about "me" than team, and uses the Gamer tag as an excuse to mask the fact that he's immature and a lousy teammate. Others use this term for a guy who does all he can in practice, gets on the field deserving it, and has a unique knack in game situations to "see" the game at a superior level that doesn't present itself in practice, and up his game to great heights. I trust that folks can easily see the difference and pick the guy that they want on their side.
Example two: for some people a "practice player" is a guy with a big heart but low talent, that a coaching staff likes, but who is really not talented enough to be more than a role player if that. He might get on the field and everybody is rooting for him. For others a "practice player" is a guy with plenty of talent that he shows in practice but can't handle the pressure of the real game competition. We had a "famous" QB in Kelly's first year who was a posterchild for this.
Babbling around slinging catch phrases without cluing the readers as to what the he!l one is talking about, is a Red Card. Contrast that sort of post with Dale's who managed to make it quite clear what sorts of players he was talking about.
Applying the definitions to Mayer, it's obvious that he's the right sort of gamer, and not a "practice player" at all, but rather a great talent who also practices hard. Trying to apply the definitions to Drew Pyne is a work in progress data-wise --- he works his butt off, but will he be great enough to be a "gamer?" He's not low talent/ceiling, but is he high talent? He certainly isn't afraid (a la Chryst.)
Thank you for your explanation. Always curious to see/hear the other side.Both of these terms have subtleties and shouldn't be loosely talked about (especially willy nilly all over the place) without a strong definition of what the heck is in discussion.
Example: for some people, the concept of a "gamer" is a high-ceiling talent who is lazy, doesn't practice hard, is more about "me" than team, and uses the Gamer tag as an excuse to mask the fact that he's immature and a lousy teammate. Others use this term for a guy who does all he can in practice, gets on the field deserving it, and has a unique knack in game situations to "see" the game at a superior level that doesn't present itself in practice, and up his game to great heights. I trust that folks can easily see the difference and pick the guy that they want on their side.
Example two: for some people a "practice player" is a guy with a big heart but low talent, that a coaching staff likes, but who is really not talented enough to be more than a role player if that. He might get on the field and everybody is rooting for him. For others a "practice player" is a guy with plenty of talent that he shows in practice but can't handle the pressure of the real game competition. We had a "famous" QB in Kelly's first year who was a posterchild for this.
Babbling around slinging catch phrases without cluing the readers as to what the he!l one is talking about, is a Red Card. Contrast that sort of post with Dale's who managed to make it quite clear what sorts of players he was talking about.
Applying the definitions to Mayer, it's obvious that he's the right sort of gamer, and not a "practice player" at all, but rather a great talent who also practices hard. Trying to apply the definitions to Drew Pyne is a work in progress data-wise --- he works his butt off, but will he be great enough to be a "gamer?" He's not low talent/ceiling, but is he high talent? He certainly isn't afraid (a la Chryst.)
Daily Wisdom: If you don't wear pants, you can't shit them.Read this and shit my drawers.
No where does MF mention Kollie as a slacker in practice...you are reading into that what you want (and you might well be right to be fair). However, it is both possible to be inconsistent in practice, but not be a slacker.Yes. Coach Freeman is talking about the practice slacker sort of "gamer" idea. He's saying that no such players will in fact play at Notre dame nor any serious program.
Not really the place to ask and it's unlikely he'll be challenging for minutes this year. Even the most hyper-athletic LBs often need time to acclimate. Look at JOK, RS freshman, broke his foot, then explodes on the scene.Any word on Sneed? I was super excited about him and thought he would see the field early. Kid seemed super athletic.
And he improved a lot over the course of 2019Not really the place to ask and it's unlikely he'll be challenging for minutes this year. Even the most hyper-athletic LBs often need time to acclimate. Look at JOK, RS freshman, broke his foot, then explodes on the scene.
Sneed will be a weapon for us but let's hope it's next year.
I'd like for him to become a weapon this year.Not really the place to ask and it's unlikely he'll be challenging for minutes this year. Even the most hyper-athletic LBs often need time to acclimate. Look at JOK, RS freshman, broke his foot, then explodes on the scene.
Sneed will be a weapon for us but let's hope it's next year.
Trying to figure out what you mean?Trying to figure out why Freeman lies to reporters and fan base
To me, Freeman basically said, "Prince, I want to play you, but I have to promote the players that practice best or the team will fall apart. You are a bit of a mess in practice and these guys do everything right. So please give me one week of great practices so I have an excuse to play you. Sound good?"
That trust isn't transferring over to the game.it comes down to trust. Can I trust you to make the right read, the right fit, the right adjustment, etc.
He may be physically more gifted and talented, but if he cant be trusted (and the others can) then the trusted players will play.
Trust is built in practice.