It's funny that you mentioned the progressions, because a lot of us mentioned how Zaire seemed to go through his progressions in the LSU game and in 2015 much better than Golson ever did. Golson often looked to his primary read, occasionally a second guy, and then he was gone if nothing was there. If Zaire failed to go through is progressions, I'm sure some of that would be rust and/or working with new receivers. Coverage was decent at times on Saturday too. I also wouldn't say Kizer necessarily has a better understanding of the offense either. He has more game experience, but Zaire has been in the program much longer. BK did mention that they changed the offense up a little to better suit Kizer when Malik was injured, so maybe he's more familiar with THAT offense, but I would say Malik still is more familiar with Kelly's system.
Kizer made better read progressions in the spring game than ever before. They couldn't trap him by sliding an extra safety over. He found the most positive matchups. Much better than ever before.
I still don't know what the fuck Golson did.
Where I don't get what you are saying, I think the misunderstanding is based upon semantics. I think ND has one offense, and two similar quarterbacks. In the post game PR, Kelly made it clear he thought that Kizer and Zaire had the same skill sets :
The only time I had that kind of scenario was when I had two quarterbacks at Cincinnati that were both proven winners. But they were so different. These two guys are so very similar in their skill-set.
But I've never had in my entire career two quarterbacks that you could run the same system of offense with. Like I said, at Cincinnati, I had two different quarterbacks. I had a 6-6 quarterback that was a pocket passer and then I had a 5-10 quarterback who was more of a perimeter-run player. These two guys can do the same kind of things and run the same offense.
(I was surprised.)
So when Kelly says :
Yeah, I thought what I saw was Malik develop more of an understanding of what we did offensively last year. He kind of had that, you know -- look, the offense developed under Kizer during the year, not Malik. So he was at a bit of a disadvantage coming into the spring, and I thought he caught up.
I have to assume this is 'a' to 'A,' instead of 'a' to 'b.' That the offense went further under Kizer.
With that, I am believing Kelly sophisticated the operation of the offense, after Zaire was injured, so by the end of the year, Kizer was more advanced in his knowledge and abilities that Zaire was. That seemed to make sense after watching the game on Saturday.