I didn't call anyone a punk. I said that it was a punk attitude.
It's funny how no one was concerned about "stretching" when people were saying that ND's Admission Office better look favorably upon the sister's application. Did I miss that? It seems like people were perfectly happy to believe that Beal's commitment was tied directly to his sister's admission at that time?
I agree with kmoose, strongly!
Either Robert didn't make it crystal clear to Kelly and Co., Robert's his commitment was based upon his sister's acceptance, which I really doubt. I don't think Kelly would have accepted Robert's commitment with
any conditions. It seemed he had some really great players last year that BK wouldn't agree to take their commitment, until taking visits to other schools was out of their blood.
Or, to decommit was a forced negotiation situation. After committing, Beal added the condition that he required ND to accept his sister. This seems more likely.
The one thing that seems impossible in the situation is that there was so bad of communication on the part of Kelly and Beal that a de-commitment was the only solution. Why would you have a situation where a kids 'dream school' tumbles from a solid commitment to out of the top five? Just because we hit a roadblock, which will happen as often as not, and two mature parties come to a disagreement that keeps them from moving forward, they rarely completely part ways at the first bump. For example, even when DRob de-committed from the Tide, he kept them in the top five.
Burning bridges, and emotional decisions in business
are punk moves. Which is all that kmoose said.
And interestingly enough, that is one of the few conclusions we can draw in this situation.
Finally, it is interesting how so many can 'kid' about bag men in these threads, and when someone proposes something that is rational, he gets attacked!