TNUtoNotreDame
Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
- Messages
- 3,779
- Reaction score
- 3,750
the 24 team playoff 9 teams from the SEC are in.... I also imagine we may get more if they are close to the top 25..
Let's say Wisconsin finishes 9-3, SMU beats Wake then loses to ND... you are looking at an ND schedule with 4x high quality games and ND at 3-1, 11-1 overall. That probably is a top 4 seed, unless everyone above ND runs the table and Bama beats Georgia in SEC championship (however, as things stand, I think Tennessee has the inside track for SEC Championship game since they own H2H over everyone they are tied with but Texas).Wisconsin has a much better chance to finish 9-3 than LSU, and a better win. Their losses are uglier (Kentucky-like) But Bama is already placed high enough to absorb LSUs 4th loss.
I was just thinking to myself, how is beating LSU any different than beating Wisconsin?This team isn’t ranked:
L: 4, 5, 15
W: 18
This team is ranked:
L: 3, 11, 19
W: NR
Thissss....I was just thinking to myself, how is beating LSU any different than beating Wisconsin?
No it goes to Alabama for some reason. Saw people discussing that on Reddit.(however, as things stand, I think Tennessee has the inside track for SEC Championship game since they own H2H over everyone they are tied with but Texas)
They're loss to us on the road is better than their best win (Wake Forest).Dropping Miami that far is crazy
Most infamously the BCS was tweaked after 2003 to make more subjective. USC was 'screwed' because they did not have a good strength of schedule; LSU and OU did not play Ty Willingham.College hockey’s postseason outside of the AQs is decided by NPI, the selection committee only there to place them in regionals. Regional placement obviously not necessary in football, there is zero reason there needs to be any sort of human element involved in this selection process.
We all hated the BCS, but I can’t help but think going back to it is the right move going forward. Hearing these guys spin their gears round and round and feed us nothing but bullshit is getting really old
The computers all have Bama pretty highly ranked. That may change now that the SEC plays a 9 game schedule and the wins over UK, MSU should fade.You can look at pretty much any computer rankings or AI modeling and note that the committee has almost all of the SEC teams ranked higher in the CFP (Georgia being the obvious #1 seed across the board).
I like 5th and hope that's the final ranking. The bye serves no purpose. The layoff is too long plus a home game is a great momentum builder.There's no valid justification for ND not to be 4th but what they will probably say
ND beat Miami without Toney (may even bring up catch although they didn't bring up our game with BYU still isn't over)
Alabama has now won on the road at both kentucky and LSU
Indiana was on a bye so they can't be jumped (lol)
Texas just won on the road at missouri (there 2 losses to unranked teams don't matter)
UCLA remains undefeated and
ND should be 4th IMO but I can see them anywhere between 4-8
Gotcha. I’ll be very surprised if we end up top 4. I bet all 4 teams that get byes will be ones who played in CCGs. We’ll see.I think he's guessing we end up in top 4, then our first game would be held at a bowl site.
Given our injuries on defense, I wouldn't mind the bye. But we would be off for more than a month, which is a long time.I like 5th and hope that's the final ranking. The bye serves no purpose. The layoff is too long plus a home game is a great momentum builder.
Posted this in the Miami game thread. It’s my understanding of why Bama would go before the Vols.No it goes to Alabama for some reason. Saw people discussing that on Reddit.
I know some will disagree, and I understand the injuries
But I think a lot of the 2024 run started with all the good vibes in South Bend against IU. I'd love to have a bonus game for the fans and get the team juiced.
Yes, this team is different than 2024 situation. But,either way I see some pros.
Or include it… as a negative in their formula.They should exclude FCS games from the calculations
Couldn't ask for betterBoise at home then UCLA is a great two game stretch imo
By best do you mean most difficult?Georgia might have the best remaining schedule.
I don’t think they’ll punish the loser of the SEC CCG as they haven’t in the past. I think Georgia and any 2 loss SEC that finishes 2nd, will be in the top 4 going into CCG weekend. We win out, we’ll be 5th, most likely.Posted this in the Miami game thread. It’s my understanding of why Bama would go before the Vols.
Your best bet is that Ga and Bama win out and Ga beats Bama in the SECCG. The crazy thing here is the SEC tiebreaker rules. Bama, Tenn, and Texas can all finish 7-2 in conference but Bama would go to the SECCG ahead of Tenn even though they lost to the Vols because Bama’s cumulative conference winning percentage of all conference opponents would be higher than the Vols. Texas beat Tenn but didn’t play Bama and has the lowest percentage of the three so they would be out.
The Irish needs to be Ga fans against Bama and then hope for some B1G chaos. Right now I do like the chances the Irish can get that bye. For all the negativity on the board about the committee, they set up the Irish to in fact get the bye if things play out as expected.
They're just part of the cash grab. It's more SEC teams for ESPN to add. Extra pawns on the board.Imagine looking at teams #13-24 and thinking they need to be given playoff spots, smh
It was so funny last year watching every CCG loser move down *except* BamaI don’t think they’ll punish the loser of the SEC CCG as they haven’t in the past. I think Georgia and any 2 loss SEC that finishes 2nd, will be in the top 4 going into CCG weekend. We win out, we’ll be 5th, most likely.