Rocketman84
Well-known member
- Messages
- 2,846
- Reaction score
- 1,377
The only services I've found all listed him at 5'10" 175lb and 4.3 speedThat was before laser timing or computers existed.
The only services I've found all listed him at 5'10" 175lb and 4.3 speedThat was before laser timing or computers existed.
I was being sarcastic. Maybe should use italics more often.The only services I've found all listed him at 5'10" 175lb and 4.3 speed
Never heard of UPI Recruiting. I was reading a more popular source. My guess is SuperPrep by Allen Wallace, though it might've been Lemming or Terranova--likely in '87.Rocket who?? Ismail was listed at 4.3 by UPI Recruiting in '88. He was the Golden West National Invt'l Runner-up in the 100 meter in 10.38 and the 60 meter National Champ in 6.28 in High School
United Press International (UPI) is who did the Top 100 rankings starting in 80s-til around '91Never heard of UPI Recruiting. I was reading a more popular source. My guess is SuperPrep by Allen Wallace, though it might've been Lemming or Terranova--likely in '87.
Back in the days of newspapers, like actual printed newspapers, UPI was the go to source for sports rankings.Never heard of UPI Recruiting. I was reading a more popular source. My guess is SuperPrep by Allen Wallace, though it might've been Lemming or Terranova--likely in '87.
Yeah UPI was a whole wire service, like the AP. They also ran the coaches poll for decades until around 1990. Would make sense they were in the rankings business in the 80s. They were pretty heavily invested in college football.Back in the days of newspapers, like actual printed newspapers, UPI was the go to source for sports rankings.
I have it on good authority that '70s computers looked like this.lol….that’s probably from the 50’s or 60’s. I worked on these guys starting in ‘72.
View attachment 3063380
I don't think it was complaining as much as it's that last year's backs were on another level and it causes some to be spoiled. Both of those backs last year were legit top 5 backs that everybody is high on (Both in the top 45 nationally before the season) and this years backs as a DUO are not as talented. Whisenton is a guy I think ends up in the top 125 and looks to have the traits and skills to be a top tier back. Rogers is a guy a lot are down on because he looks slightly above average on film with limited burst and it's hasn't been a track record of guys running for less than 1k in HS having success in college.We have the composite #9 and #13 RBs committed and people were complaining...after getting the composite #9 and #11 RBs last year.
Whisenton will rise more but what do you think about Rogers?I still don’t think that’s high enough and his senior tape will show that.
We have the composite #9 and #13 RBs committed and people were complaining...after getting the composite #9 and #11 RBs last year.
I love Lathan's upside and think he will climb significantly up the rankings because his tools are special, it just about how good is football IQ and instincts are. He's got some BOOM or BUST about him but I'm not worried about that.I think Latham is too low and Rogers too high.