Jim Mora to UCLA

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491
I think it's a recognizable name...even for young kids. He can also throw around his NFL experience to reel in recruits. Then if he does add Tressel as OC, they may be on to something.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
I seriously doubt Tressel would leave the still-friendly confines of Ohio to go to UCLA as a coordinator. It just doesn't make sense from his angle.
 
Messages
450
Reaction score
16
I doubt the rumor is true either. Many people said they saw Tressel on campus while others claim that it was just a guy that looked like him.
 

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491
I doubt the rumor is true either. Many people said they saw Tressel on campus while others claim that it was just a guy that looked like him.

JimTresselLook-a-Like1.jpg


This guy again?
 

gspjeb

Member
Messages
160
Reaction score
12
Mora is not a bad hire for UCLA I think. Lots of schools open this year and he is a solid coach that will be able to recruit. Hopefully can steal some kids away from the Trojans in years to come.
 

irish1958

Príomh comhairleoir
Messages
1,039
Reaction score
112
Mora is not a bad hire for UCLA I think. Lots of schools open this year and he is a solid coach that will be able to recruit. Hopefully can steal some kids away from the Trojans in years to come.
I agree. A strong UCLA is in our best interest for a couple of reasons. First, they would share the southern California prospects; and secondly, they often play USC the week before or after we do so that would keep USC from keying on either one.
 

anarin

They call me Chuck.
Messages
3,284
Reaction score
809
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U7fjDS0jKiE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

His UCLA acceptance speech :)
 

BobD

Can't get no satisfaction
Messages
7,918
Reaction score
1,034
with the BCS he won't have to worry about saying playoffs.

Bowl games? What makes you think we'll be in a bowl game, we'll be lucky to win another game, bowl game?
 
Messages
450
Reaction score
16
Mora is not a bad hire for UCLA I think. Lots of schools open this year and he is a solid coach that will be able to recruit. Hopefully can steal some kids away from the Trojans in years to come.

I don't know about the whole solid coach part because as a HC he got fired everywhere he went. I do however agree that there will be excitement around the program for at least two years and UCLA will recruit.
 

irishog77

NOT SINBAD's NEPHEW
Messages
7,441
Reaction score
2,206
Who knows exactly how good he'll be. It's not like another NFL retread head coach who wasn't anybody's first choice hasn't had success in So Cal before though.

I think part of UCLA's problem(s) isn't just coaching though. For a variety of reasons, UCLA seems to always be fighting an uphill battle there against USC. And I don't exactly know why. UCLA is in a much better part of town than USC (the Westwood area bordered by Hollywood is a pretty sweet locale...versus USC's urban/downtown campus), has a reputation as one of the premier state schools in the entire country, has some football tradition (they're not super rich in this department, but there is absolutely some), has awesome weather AND girls and a strong alumni base, and is one of the premier schools in the country for all sports other than football.

NDinL.A. (or any of you southern California guys)-- any insights as to why UCLA struggles? I know their facilities supposedly aren't that great. And I hear pros and cons about playing in the Rose Bowl.
 

tadman95

I have a bigger bullet
Messages
2,846
Reaction score
248
Name recognition, and he's pretty funny. Beyond that, I don't know. His NFL teams were just a little above average. Fired twice.

Maybe he can pick off some USC recruits as mentioned above.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,944
Reaction score
11,224
UCLA struggles because they won't spend the time and money on the athletic program, then they only give a coach three years to win big... the facilities are no longer up to par, stuff like like that... the powers that be are the problem from what I hear... and I hear a lot...

many UCLA grads and fans in my family/circle of friends... MANY. They all same the same thing.
 

Couv Domer

New member
Messages
66
Reaction score
5
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U7fjDS0jKiE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

His UCLA acceptance speech :)

I believe we're talking about Jim Mora Jr., not his father, shown in the rant above.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
UCLA struggles because they won't spend the time and money on the athletic program, then they only give a coach three years to win big... the facilities are no longer up to par, stuff like like that... the powers that be are the problem from what I hear... and I hear a lot...

many UCLA grads and fans in my family/circle of friends... MANY. They all same the same thing.

So it's basically Notre Dame circa the Monk Malloy era.
 

tadman95

I have a bigger bullet
Messages
2,846
Reaction score
248
UCLA struggles because they won't spend the time and money on the athletic program, then they only give a coach three years to win big... the facilities are no longer up to par, stuff like like that... the powers that be are the problem from what I hear... and I hear a lot...

many UCLA grads and fans in my family/circle of friends... MANY. They all same the same thing.

I've heard that too. Facilities are pretty bad compared to today's standards.
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
NDinL.A. (or any of you southern California guys)-- any insights as to why UCLA struggles? I know their facilities supposedly aren't that great. And I hear pros and cons about playing in the Rose Bowl.

UCLA struggles because they won't spend the time and money on the athletic program, then they only give a coach three years to win big... the facilities are no longer up to par, stuff like like that... the powers that be are the problem from what I hear... and I hear a lot...

many UCLA grads and fans in my family/circle of friends... MANY. They all same the same thing.

That's the thing, they just don't spend the money on coaches. Being a public school, they can't pay for a coach like USC does unless some boosters do it for them. But they figure b/c of the locale and the recruiting hotbed that they can get coaches to take less money.

And to go further, the REAL problem is that they don't pay their assistant coaches well. If you're an asst coach, and you get paid X amount of money to live in Los Angeles, will you take that or will you take way more $$$ to live in a smaller city which costs a whole lot less to live in? And if you work at UCLA, you HAVE to live on the westside due to traffic, and it costs a helluva lot of money to live there (my wife and I rented in Culver City, near Westwood, and when we wanted to buy, we couldn't believe how friggin expensive the westside was. It's unreal). So you're taking less money to live in a place that costs more.

Now, there are obvious perks to working at UCLA, as have been mentioned. But money talks, and if UCLA wants to start winning, they have to pay up. Thy hired Neuheisal on the cheap b/c he was a broken man at the time, and now they're hiring Mora Jr, who hasn't coached in years. I do like the hire though, all things considered. I think he's more built for the college game than the pros, and he's a defensive mind, which is what they need IMO (the Pac 12 is all offensive minded coaches - look at what Petey did at USC).

They also might bring in a stud asst coach/recruiter, a young energetic guy by the name of Adrian Klemm. If they bring him in, then I know they'll be all in, cause the guy will bring in some stud recruits and steal them away from USC during the sanctions...
 
Last edited:

NYIrish14

Member
Messages
713
Reaction score
16
That's the thing, they just don't spend the money on coaches. Being a public school, they can't pay for a coach like USC does unless some boosters do it for them. But they figure b/c of the locale and the recruiting hotbed that they can get coaches to take less money.

And to go further, the REAL problem is that they don't pay their assistant coaches well. If you're an asst coach, and you get paid X amount of money to live in Los Angeles, will you take that or will you take way more $$$ to live in a smaller city which costs a whole lot less to live in? And if you work at UCLA, you HAVE to live on the westside due to traffic, and it costs a helluva lot of money to live there (my wife and I rented in Culver City, near Westwood, and when we wanted to buy, we couldn't believe how friggin expensive the westside was. It's unreal). So you're taking less money to live in a place that costs more.

Now, there are obvious perks to working at UCLA, as have been mentioned. But money talks, and if UCLA wants to start winning, they have to pay up. Thy hired Neuheisal on the cheap b/c he was a broken man at the time, and now they're hiring Mora Jr, who hasn't coached in years. I do like the hire though, all things considered. I think he's more built for the college game than the pros, and he's a defensive mind, which is what they need IMO (the Pac 12 is all offensive minded coaches - look at what Petey did at USC).

They also might bring in a stud asst coach/recruiter, a young energetic guy by the name of Adrian Klemm. If they bring him in, they I know they'll be all in, cause the guy will bring in some stud recruits and steal them away from USC during the sanctions...

Sounds like ND should hire this Klemm guy. Especially if Warinner moves to OC.
 
Last edited:

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491
Yea, I saw little excitement over Mora Jr., but plenty for the possibility to add Klemm to the staff while reading a UCLA fan page.
 

yankeehater

Well-known member
Messages
2,197
Reaction score
774
That's the thing, they just don't spend the money on coaches. Being a public school, they can't pay for a coach like USC does unless some boosters do it for them. But they figure b/c of the locale and the recruiting hotbed that they can get coaches to take less money.

And to go further, the REAL problem is that they don't pay their assistant coaches well. If you're an asst coach, and you get paid X amount of money to live in Los Angeles, will you take that or will you take way more $$$ to live in a smaller city which costs a whole lot less to live in? And if you work at UCLA, you HAVE to live on the westside due to traffic, and it costs a helluva lot of money to live there (my wife and I rented in Culver City, near Westwood, and when we wanted to buy, we couldn't believe how friggin expensive the westside was. It's unreal). So you're taking less money to live in a place that costs more.

They also might bring in a stud asst coach/recruiter, a young energetic guy by the name of Adrian Klemm. If they bring him in, then I know they'll be all in, cause the guy will bring in some stud recruits and steal them away from USC during the sanctions...

I would have to disagree with this based on the fact that although they are restricted as a state school they just spent the money on an assistant named Norm Chow. Obviously this did not work for several reasons I believe, but I don't know of many people out here that did not think a combo of Neuheisel and Chow would not have worked.

First and foremost they are and will always be known as a basketball school. See North Carolina, Duke and Kansas (time will only tell if Charlie can change that).

Second, they will always play second fiddle in this town to SC. Kids in LA grow up dreaming of playing football at SC not UCLA.

Finally, they do not have an on campus stadium. I know the Rose Bowl is an iconic venue, but it does not compare to having an on campus site. I enjoy tailgaiting there, but to get students to drive back to forth (more than likely after drinking) from Westwood is difficult. With usually a half full stadium it is one of the worst college football environments I have experienced. Prime example is we brought a buddy out from the South (Clemson grad) to a game last year and he was so bored he left at halftime to go back and tailgate. This was opposite of our game experience when he had us out to a Clemson game.
 

yankeehater

Well-known member
Messages
2,197
Reaction score
774
UCLA to hire Jim L. Mora as football coach - latimes.com

Heard there were rumors that he was coming to UCLA and that he would try to get Tressel as OC. Personally I think UCLA could have done a lot better than that considering the money they had to throw around. Maybe this was the best UCLA could get.

I heard the Tressel rumor on several local radio stations as well. He was reportedly on campus all week. The reports are UCLA wants to bring him in at a lower level (as a head coach in waiting). As soon as they feel the smoke has cleared and the dust has settled with his problems at Ohio State, then he would become the head coach.

This is all just heresay and speculation and I don't think Jim Mora Jr. would take the job if this is the case, but who knows.
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
I would have to disagree with this based on the fact that although they are restricted as a state school they just spent the money on an assistant named Norm Chow. Obviously this did not work for several reasons I believe, but I don't know of many people out here that did not think a combo of Neuheisel and Chow would not have worked.

First and foremost they are and will always be known as a basketball school. See North Carolina, Duke and Kansas (time will only tell if Charlie can change that).

Second, they will always play second fiddle in this town to SC. Kids in LA grow up dreaming of playing football at SC not UCLA.

Finally, they do not have an on campus stadium. I know the Rose Bowl is an iconic venue, but it does not compare to having an on campus site. I enjoy tailgaiting there, but to get students to drive back to forth (more than likely after drinking) from Westwood is difficult. With usually a half full stadium it is one of the worst college football environments I have experienced. Prime example is we brought a buddy out from the South (Clemson grad) to a game last year and he was so bored he left at halftime to go back and tailgate. This was opposite of our game experience when he had us out to a Clemson game.

1. You're making my point for me. And how long did it take them to finally pay an assistant? And how many assistants got paid like other assistants at other schools? ONE. Sorry, but that doesn't make for a trend, it makes for an exception.

2. True, UCLA is a basketball school. But they have had lots of success in football. They've been ranked in the top 5 during several seasons. Shoot, if not for a devastating hurricane, they would've been in the national championship game for Bob Toledo. It can be done.

3. USC is definitely the top game in town, but there are times when UCLA is the better team. Not since Petey of course, but this was a true rivalry for decades. And UCLA has outrecruited USC at times, and at the very least, have put some great athletes on the field. Coaching has been the issue.

4. Agreed with the Rose Bowl thing, but USC games are the exact same. And they win.

Gotta get the right coach in, and pay him and his assistants, and UCLA can be a goldmine.
 

TDHeysus

FLOOR(RAND()*(N-D+1))+D;
Messages
3,315
Reaction score
355
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U7fjDS0jKiE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

His UCLA acceptance speech :)

Jim Mora (dad) has had some of the funniest post game interviews of all time...i love the guy(in the most manliest way)...

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Tie0tz7jGDI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

yankeehater

Well-known member
Messages
2,197
Reaction score
774
1. You're making my point for me. And how long did it take them to finally pay an assistant? And how many assistants got paid like other assistants at other schools? ONE. Sorry, but that doesn't make for a trend, it makes for an exception.

2. True, UCLA is a basketball school. But they have had lots of success in football. They've been ranked in the top 5 during several seasons. Shoot, if not for a devastating hurricane, they would've been in the national championship game for Bob Toledo. It can be done.

3. USC is definitely the top game in town, but there are times when UCLA is the better team. Not since Petey of course, but this was a true rivalry for decades. And UCLA has outrecruited USC at times, and at the very least, have put some great athletes on the field. Coaching has been the issue.

4. Agreed with the Rose Bowl thing, but USC games are the exact same. And they win.

Gotta get the right coach in, and pay him and his assistants, and UCLA can be a goldmine.

I believe most of your points.

I do think that UCLA now understands that they need to pay all of their coaches so this will become the rule and not the exception especially if they want a winning program.

Although UCLA has won in the past, it never garners the buss or excitement in town that a winning SC program does.

Yes, the Coliseum is technically an off site stadium, but it is obviously walking distance from the campus for the SC students. Unfortunately or fortunately, I made that walk many a times through the ghetto when my cousin played for Petey.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,944
Reaction score
11,224
I believe most of your points.

I do think that UCLA now understands that they need to pay all of their coaches so this will become the rule and not the exception especially if they want a winning program.

Although UCLA has won in the past, it never garners the buss or excitement in town that a winning SC program does.

Yes, the Coliseum is technically an off site stadium, but it is obviously walking distance from the campus for the SC students. Unfortunately or fortunately, I made that walk many a times through the ghetto when my cousin played for Petey.

I grew up in So Cal... BELIEVE ME... for the most part, no one cares about USC unless they are what they have been recently... when I was a kid I remember feeling bad for USc fans becasue there were so few of them, and for the most part they had nothing to root for

during this era there was an eleven year window there where USC was 0'fer against Notre Dame and RARELY beat UCLA during the same era... back then UCLA owned the town... trust me, all it will take is a winning coach and the town will be split in half, and that's assuming USC is winning at the same time...

when you have as much to do as So CAlers have, you need to win to get the buzz... look at the lakers vs. the clippers... I rest that case.
 
Top