BestBIrish47
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,697
- Reaction score
- 195
It was lobbed to me... I had to swing...
That is what she said
It was lobbed to me... I had to swing...
He's distantly related to GBDomer? lol
Get it? Cause that's what some people on the site call him!
QUESTION:Thoughts on G. Kiel's decommitment to IU?
LYNN: If in fact he decommits, it would be a real blow to IU's efforts to turn the program around. It would send an undesirable message to other recruits considering IU.
JEREMY: I suppose technically that's a high school sports question. For anybody that remotely follows college football recruiting, not a big surprise. A commitment in football is nothing like a commitment in basketball. And in the case of a high profile guy like Gunner Kiel, schools are going to keep knocking on the door every single day.
For Kiel, it's probably a good idea to weigh his options, and at the end of the day, maybe he comes back to IU, though I doubt it. The word is Notre Dame is now in the mix, a school that wasn't among Kiel's previous suitors. The Irish are much closer to home than Alabama or the like, and a much better program than the Hoosiers, so it really makes sense. All IU fans can really ask is that he not wind up at Purdue.
Obviously none of us know what is truly going on behind the scenes, which makes recruiting interesting and stressful at the same time. Having said that, I would imagine that Coach Kelly would have informed Gunner if he felt that there was "too" much of a log jam in the QB dept. for us. I really like our chances and I think that Tommy will be in a battle next year to keep his starting job-just my thoughts.
Tommy is going to have to battle for his job every year. With or without a Kiel commitment.
We already have a logjam at QB. Rees (starter) Hendrix (change of pace who looked really good) and Golson (future QB?), not to mention Crist
add Kiel to that mix, and there will be a transfer. maybe more than one. What if Kiel's commitment would mean a Golson transfer? Would you rather have Kiel as our QB of the future than Golson?
What if Kiel's commitment would mean a Golson transfer? Would you rather have Kiel as our QB of the future than Golson?
I haven't read the 1000 posts today. I am in the minority in that I don't really want him to take up one of our scholarships, though, in the few posts that I did read. Damn. Whatever.
Well this would be a pleasant surprise. Wouldn't be shocked to see Gunner come to ND and be a 2-4 year starter. I really don't see him going to Michigan (even though supposedly their coaches are going to stop by this week) and Oklahoma/Alabama arguably have much harder QB situations for him to break into early. At ND Tommy Rees will be a junior when he's a frosh (RS) and then a senior for his first year of eligibility. Hypothetically he could pull an Andrew Luck and supplant him (unlikely) or simply take over the reigns as a Soph with 2 years of time to learn the ropes and therefor not get fed to the Wolves.
I'll cross my fingers. I think this could also push us over the top with a big time WR like Agholor.
This is exactly what I was thinking
Yes... you are in the minority.
We already have a logjam at QB. Rees (starter) Hendrix (change of pace who looked really good) and Golson (future QB?), not to mention Crist
add Kiel to that mix, and there will be a transfer. maybe more than one. What if Kiel's commitment would mean a Golson transfer? Would you rather have Kiel as our QB of the future than Golson?
We already have a logjam at QB. Rees (starter) Hendrix (change of pace who looked really good) and Golson (future QB?), not to mention Crist
add Kiel to that mix, and there will be a transfer. maybe more than one. What if Kiel's commitment would mean a Golson transfer? Would you rather have Kiel as our QB of the future than Golson?
Gunner played against my brother's high school team a few weeks back (Columbus East vs. Floyd Central). Floyd has the state's leader in rushing yards and Gunner led them in dramatic fashion in an offensive showdown.
Yeah, I kind of figure that, but also I knew your stance a year ago. Legacy or not. I would rather go after a position of greater need.
Kiel commit wouldn't on it's own have any impact on Golson one would think. I believe if Kiel committed, the domino that would fall would be Kelly not extending a 5th yr. Option to Crist (if he wanted to come back).
Even though I may get ripped for saying it, I'm kind of with you on this one, Backhand. I wouldn't be upset if Kiel came, but if it means we lose out on an Armstead, Odenigbo, Thompson, K. Marshall, or Agholor, I'd be upset about losing a player like that. I know people on here say that players like Thompson, Armstead, K. Marshall, and Agholor we take no matter what (and I agree), but at a certain point, limited numbers do become a factor. I think all of the players visiting this weekend (and beyond) do have some legitimate interest in coming to ND, and I think the coaches have legitimate interest in wanting all the players that are coming this weekend (and beyond) to come to ND. Obviously ALL the players aren't going to commit and come to ND, but I think getting 6 or so commits of all the ones visiting ND this weekend and in the next few weeks is virtually a given. And a coach (well, a good coach) has to wage the ever-present battle of needs-vs.-wants. Unfortunately, I think Kiel (and every other QB this year) fall more into the category of a "want" instead of a "need." I think the better question to ask may be, "Would you rather have Kiel this year (and thus, not another player we're recruiting hard and heavy), or the known entities of Rees, Hendrix, Golson, and the likelihood of signing another highly-rated QB next year?" I will say that if Kiel's commitment means another QB currently on the roster transfers, then so be it. It's all probably for the best anyway.
I don't know- just something to consider in all this.
You are down where I am from.
What area are you from?
Harrison County
Good. My lil heart couldn't take something like that.
#herecomesthebigone