Could it be that the decision on Dever relies on whether or not we are getting Niklas?
Right now I think the order of 5th years is:
1. Dever
2. Other
I'm assuming the first player in, regardless of position, is going to take the spot from "Other." Niklas was originally being recruited for us as a DE. I think he projects best as an OT in the spread because of his frame and speed. Either way, he needs to add a significant amount of weight before he will be ready to rock on either side of the ball. As he won't be an immediate contributor, I don't think that affects which 5th year is kept.
At this time, I'm assuming we land Niklas this weekend. Maybe he won't like the snow, but I think USC is too full for him to head there and I don't think Stanford has long term appeal anymore. So that's a big assumption, but with that fact you have Dever vs. Haynes. Looking at a 4 year plan, yeah.. I can understand Haynes over Dever. Looking at next year, there is no way that puts us in the best position to win.
My *guess* is that BK will say "Look, plenty of kids turn down scholarships to OSU for Notre Dame every year because ND is simply a much better school. Right now, the numbers are kind of tricky so we can't promise you a scholarship. We don't over-recruit like the SEC and hope for the best. But we would love for you to be a preferred walk-on and when a scholarship does eventually open up you will be the first to have it."
This just seems like the most probable scenario to me based on this trail of evidence:
1. Bryce was going to commit, and then delayed it.
2. He then scheduled a meeting with BK and says when it is over he will "hopefully" have a decision made.
To me it seems like he wants to go to ND, was going to declare for ND, something happened with his offer and now he is meeting with BK, if he has an actionable offer he will declare for ND and if not he will likely debate over it for a bit and then declare for OSU.
This is complete spit balling, but at least it is logical.