How Tyrone destroyed Notre Dame: how we got here & why we should be excited for 2011

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
How Tyrone destroyed Notre Dame: how we got here & why we should be excited for 2011

I was going to save this until after NSD, but after seeing Bogtrotter about to put out a post that I think is along these lines, I figured I might as well not waste something that took me too much time to write. So while players and such may change between now and when we actually enroll the ’11 class, the premise should remain the same.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tyrone Willingham is not a bad football coach. He isn’t stupid or bad at player development or prone to clock management issues. For all intents and purposes, he is an average D1 football coach. However, he is one of the worst (if arguably not the single worst) recruiter in the land. We’re talking epic levels of bad and when it comes to college football you have to be able to both coach and recruit well.

How it Started
Going back to Bob Davie, you had a guy who could recruit OK but was a bad coach. So he was fired but left a pretty well stocked, although not exceptional, cupboard of players for Willingham. What happened next caused 3-9 and probably cost Charlie Weis his job. Although Willingham was very successful in his first season, he put together recruiting classes that both ignored power position players and overall highly rated athletes. His ’04 and ’05 classes were bad not just by Notre Dame standards but for any team in a BCS conference. You can see them here: Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2004 Notre Dame Commitments.

The Weis Years
So Charlie Weis takes over and inherits some talent but two completely depleted classes in ’04 and ’05. The good news is that the ’03 and ’02 classes were good enough that Charlie was able to take them and do some pretty great things. Based on this success, Charlie lands great classes in ’06 and ’07 but coming into the ’07 season he is forced to start basically all freshman, RS freshman and sophomores across the board. With the utter lack of power players brought in by Willingham plus the overall lack of talent, Charlie basically had to throw underdeveloped freshman to the wolves because ’04 and ’05 provided no depth from seniors or juniors. What happens? 3-9 and a loss to Navy. Now fast forward to ’11.

The Kelly Era
Believe it or not, Charlie landed some VERY good defensive recruits in his time but just never fully developed them or landed enough of them to have any depth. Ironically, by the time he developed depth, he was on his way out the door… mostly because he didn’t have the expected production on defense (thanks again, Ty). When you look at this year’s depth chart, it is staggering just how much developed and new talent we have in the front 7 compared to recent years. Let’s take a look at our hypothetical front 3 first:
DE 1: KLM/Kona/Tuitt
DE 2: EJ/Hafis/Lynch
DT: Cwynar/Stockton/Nix

So at one DE position you have KLM, Kona and Tuitt. All big bodied strong guys… KLM is 4* in his fourth year of development and has another year left (OMG red shirt?!?! On the DL!?!), Kona is a high 3*/4* with tons of upside and Tuitt is an incoming 5*. At the other DE position you have a 5* in his fourth year in EJ backed up by a stout 3* in Hafis Williams who has played both DE and DT in the 3-4 and incoming 5* Aaron "BEAST" Lynch.

DT has a highly rated 4* in Cwynar backed up (or competing with) two highly rated 4*s in Stockton and Nix. Nix is a prototypical 3-4 DT and Stockton is a big bowling ball himself and was the #32 player in the country coming out of HS. Stockton has had some injury problems but has 3 years of eligibility remaining and could be a serious impact player if he stays healthy. When was the last time ND had 4*+ talent 3 deep on the DL? I honestly can’t remember. Maybe the Holtz years.

When you couple this depth with the talent at LB it simply gets scary. Te’o and the other ILBs are all very talented and it should be a fierce competition (DO NOT expect Carlo to get the ILB job handed to him with all of the talent there) and at OLB you have a guy in Ishaq who can play right away coupled with vets like Fleming and Filer as well as good young blood like Shembo and others we haven't really seen yet. This gives guys like Councell and Rabasa the potential to redshirt (if necessary) and develop into serious playmakers down the road if that's what the coaches want. In no way will a player be forced to play when he isn't ready to be a star yet.

Lastly, on the other side of the ball, whereas Ty didn’t recruit OL for **** and Charlie ended up wasting elite prospects like Sam Young, this year we will have a developed and veteran OL that, while there might not be a ton of depth, has enough to play effectively this season even if one or two players go down. Everyone should see that this Notre Dame team could be the best it has been in the trenches in a long time. And the best news? There are a whole bunch of bigs coming in this class that have flexibility to play on either side of the ball as needed. If these prospects are given time to learn and grow before being thrust onto the field there is really no telling what kind of players they turn into. As long as Notre Dame can find the answer at QB and some skill positions, expect a pretty big 2011 followed by a crazy 2012 against some very elite competition. Too optimistic? Maybe. But for the first time in a long time it appears we will have a commanding defense.

Go Irish.
 

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,971
Reaction score
6,459
I'll order a glass of that Kool-Aid myself---just as long as it's Green and approved by Johnny. [who needs to be given his "identifier" back].
 

Rhode Irish

Semi-retired
Messages
7,057
Reaction score
900
Great job, Lax. I have had some of these same thoughts bouncing around in my mind, but you did a great job organizing it and simplifying it. Thanks.

On a side note, I'm glad you broke down the issue with Ty's last two classes. I am as big of a BK supporter as there is, and that isn't based on the last 2 months - I really, really wanted ND to hire him when they let go of Charlie. But having said that, as a life-long Pats and ND fan, I really wanted Charlie to succeed at ND. I think that, based on his early success, people don't consider that he was a little handcuffed by the roster he had to play with in his 3rd and 4th years. I'm not totally absolving him, because he was given a fair chance to develop his own recruits, but the situation was was more difficult that people realized. He showed in those first two years he could coach talent, but between Ty and himself he just didn't have enough to coach after that. I won't be rooting for him quite as much now that he's with the Gators, but I have little doubt he will put together great offenses now that all he has to worry about is that side of the ball.
 

irish4ever

Well-known member
Messages
3,792
Reaction score
896
Very good write up, but I can't believe that you used the word "BEAST" in the context of your note!
 

enrico514

New member
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
45
I'm pretty sure Ty was a lazy recruiter more than a bad recruiter. I wasn't following recruiting that much back then but I think we've all heard stories of highly regarded recruits who were basically ignored by Ty and his coaching staff when they came on campus... I believe that was the case of a qb that ended up at USC.

Many of you have been following ND and recruiting for years and before the internet... would you guys consider that 2004 class to be the worst in ND history???

6x 2* players and 8x 3* players... wow!!!
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
Very good write up, but I can't believe that you used the word "BEAST" in the context of your note!

hahahaha I did that ONLY because of the thread... was wondering if anyone would catch that
 
Messages
613
Reaction score
9
Great post, you obviously put alot of thought and effort into this. I was confident going into next year also, but now I will probably need to order a double shot of the green Kool-aid while wearing green tinted shades. I believe you should repost this every time there is any doubt where we are headed. Reps to you sir.
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
I was going to save this until after NSD, but after seeing Bogtrotter about to put out a post that I think is along these lines, I figured I might as well not waste something that took me too much time to write. So while players and such may change between now and when we actually enroll the ’11 class, the premise should remain the same.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tyrone Willingham is not a bad football coach. He isn’t stupid or bad at player development or prone to clock management issues. For all intents and purposes, he is an average D1 football coach. However, he is one of the worst (if arguably not the single worst) recruiter in the land. We’re talking epic levels of bad and when it comes to college football you have to be able to both coach and recruit well.

How it Started
Going back to Bob Davie, you had a guy who could recruit OK but was a bad coach. So he was fired but left a pretty well stocked, although not exceptional, cupboard of players for Willingham. What happened next caused 3-9 and probably cost Charlie Weis his job. Although Willingham was very successful in his first season, he put together recruiting classes that both ignored power position players and overall highly rated athletes. His ’04 and ’05 classes were bad not just by Notre Dame standards but for any team in a BCS conference. You can see them here: Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2004 Notre Dame Commitments.

The Weis Years
So Charlie Weis takes over and inherits some talent but two completely depleted classes in ’04 and ’05. The good news is that the ’03 and ’02 classes were good enough that Charlie was able to take them and do some pretty great things. Based on this success, Charlie lands great classes in ’06 and ’07 but coming into the ’07 season he is forced to start basically all freshman, RS freshman and sophomores across the board. With the utter lack of power players brought in by Willingham plus the overall lack of talent, Charlie basically had to throw underdeveloped freshman to the wolves because ’04 and ’05 provided no depth from seniors or juniors. What happens? 3-9 and a loss to Navy. Now fast forward to ’11.

The Kelly Era
Believe it or not, Charlie landed some VERY good defensive recruits in his time but just never fully developed them or landed enough of them to have any depth. Ironically, by the time he developed depth, he was on his way out the door… mostly because he didn’t have the expected production on defense (thanks again, Ty). When you look at this year’s depth chart, it is staggering just how much developed and new talent we have in the front 7 compared to recent years. Let’s take a look at our hypothetical front 3 first:
DE 1: KLM/Kona/Tuitt
DE 2: EJ/Hafis/Lynch
DT: Cwynar/Stockton/Nix

So at one DE position you have KLM, Kona and Tuitt. All big bodied strong guys… KLM is 4* in his fourth year of development and has another year left (OMG red shirt?!?! On the DL!?!), Kona is a high 3*/4* with tons of upside and Tuitt is an incoming 5*. At the other DE position you have a 5* in his fourth year in EJ backed up by a stout 3* in Hafis Williams who has played both DE and DT in the 3-4 and incoming 5* Aaron "BEAST" Lynch.

DT has a highly rated 4* in Cwynar backed up (or competing with) two highly rated 4*s in Stockton and Nix. Nix is a prototypical 3-4 DT and Stockton is a big bowling ball himself and was the #32 player in the country coming out of HS. Stockton has had some injury problems but has 3 years of eligibility remaining and could be a serious impact player if he stays healthy. When was the last time ND had 4*+ talent 3 deep on the DL? I honestly can’t remember. Maybe the Holtz years.

When you couple this depth with the talent at LB it simply gets scary. Te’o and the other ILBs are all very talented and it should be a fierce competition (DO NOT expect Carlo to get the ILB job handed to him with all of the talent there) and at OLB you have a guy in Ishaq who can play right away coupled with vets like Fleming and Filer as well as good young blood like Shembo and others we haven't really seen yet. This gives guys like Councell and Rabasa the potential to redshirt (if necessary) and develop into serious playmakers down the road if that's what the coaches want. In no way will a player be forced to play when he isn't ready to be a star yet.

Lastly, on the other side of the ball, whereas Ty didn’t recruit OL for **** and Charlie ended up wasting elite prospects like Sam Young, this year we will have a developed and veteran OL that, while there might not be a ton of depth, has enough to play effectively this season even if one or two players go down. Everyone should see that this Notre Dame team could be the best it has been in the trenches in a long time. And the best news? There are a whole bunch of bigs coming in this class that have flexibility to play on either side of the ball as needed. If these prospects are given time to learn and grow before being thrust onto the field there is really no telling what kind of players they turn into. As long as Notre Dame can find the answer at QB and some skill positions, expect a pretty big 2011 followed by a crazy 2012 against some very elite competition. Too optimistic? Maybe. But for the first time in a long time it appears we will have a commanding defense.

Go Irish.

Thats a solid piece there LAX...agree there is cause for some optimism. From the day Bob Davie was selected, I knew we were in for tough times...but I NEVER could have fathomed how deep the cavern would be...its nice to see some daylight for this program...
 

mick2

JRPG's are for nerds!
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
135
imagine if this whole thing came full circle and we faced charlie and the gators in the NC? very possible.
 

Veer option

Anti sarcasm font
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
208
Great stuff!!!!!!!!!



I cannot remember but was Carlyle Holiday a Davie guy or Willingham?
 

rikkitikki08

Well-known member
Messages
4,261
Reaction score
3,090
SOLID write up LAX, your one of the many reasons why i come to this board everyday. And also i agree the willingham era was horrible recruiting wise
 

IrishinSyria

In truth lies victory
Messages
6,042
Reaction score
1,920
Yup. Repeat after me: Lack of veteran depth at power positions is what got Charlie fired. Lack of veteran depth at power positions is... you get the point.

Good write up. CW did great things for the Irish, and Kelly seems to be poised to build off of that base.
 

Kak7304

Well-known member
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
361
Thank you for the great write up. Here's my additional input:

IrishLax;450665 Believe it or not said:
I thought the defense was starting to improve under Corwin Brown and would have maybe made more strides if CB were given more of a chance. The biggest mistake Weis made, which ended up leading to his downfall at ND, was the hire of Tenuta and the switch back to the 4-3. We had 3-4 personnel on the team trying to fit into a crappy scheme. I just love how our D performed at the end of this year after Tenuta blamed the failures of the D last year on the lack of athletes.

Another thing that I believe hurt Weis was his choice in Mendoza as strength and conditioning coach. The players made huge gains in strength and mass over their ND careers but seemed to get slower. Most of the ND players from this time period put up great numbers on the bench press at the NFL combine but poor 40 times. Mendoza built up massive linemen who could bench press all the weight in the gym but could not move laterally. This would have been great if we ran an offense like Wisconsin does, but it's not so great for a finesse passing game.

I will forever be thankful for Weis because he took over a job that no one wanted, showed you can win and recruit at ND, and made the job desirable again. He ultimately didn't succeed here, but he definitely left our program in much better shape than when he took over.

IHowever, he is one of the worst (if arguably not the single worst) recruiter in the land. We’re talking epic levels of bad and when it comes to college football you have to be able to both coach and recruit well.

I can't even justify calling Ty a bad recruiter. Calling him "bad" at recruiting has a connotation of attempt and ultimately, failure. He was lazy and never even tried. Also, I was a freshman at ND during Ty's last year (our bookstore basketball name of "No shirt, No shoes, No Ty, No problem," referencing the Leprechaun Legion shirts of the time, was rejected) and had class with several football players. I asked them how practices were under Weis compared to Willingham and they said they were unbelievably more intense (same thing we are hearing about Kelly compared to Weis). Apparently under Willingham, if you weren't a starter, you pretty much stood on the sidelines during practice and watched most of the time. Those were dark, dark days for our program.
 

phork

Raining On Your Parade
Messages
9,863
Reaction score
1,019
Yup. Repeat after me: Lack of veteran depth at power positions is what got Charlie fired. Lack of veteran depth at power positions is... you get the point.

Good write up. CW did great things for the Irish, and Kelly seems to be poised to build off of that base.

Charlie had more than enough time to get the defense in order.
 

PapaIrish37

Active member
Messages
388
Reaction score
52
Thanks IrishLax. Also thanks for the great run last spring on the lacrosse field.

As a lifelong Irish fan, I really wanted CW to succeed. However, didn't join this board until we were starting to look for his replacement so you can't look it up. I appreciate how he has looked out for his/our guys after he has left ND. Has shown a lot of class in many ways.

The lesson to be learned from the story portrayed - every year is important. Every detail is important. BK was not my first choice but he seems to have us going in the right direction in so many ways. His attention to detail is amazing.

His belief that it is a privelege to play FOR Notre Dame is the main reason there is hope for a turnaround (other than his obvious football acumen and Bob Diaco).

Great 2 weeks to be Irish. Can't wait for the fall.

GO IRISH!
 

CanadianIrish

New member
Messages
617
Reaction score
26
Here's the problem with your theory: the 2006 class were Seniors in CW's last year, and that was Charlie's first full recruiting class. It was ranked 8th nationally, and there were 28 recruits in that class. The 2007 class were juniors, and it was also ranked 8th nationally and had 12 four star players.

Charlie didn't get fired because of 2007 or 2008, he was given a pass for those years precisely because of the problem you've described. Charlie was fired because of 2009, which was an unmitigated disaster with all of his kids.

He was still succeeding at recruitment despite how bad the program was performing on the field, which was another way that Ty could be blamed for destroying the program, but that didn't happen either.

Anyways, no doubt that Ty was a disaster, but he can't be blamed for the state of the program today - that rests on CW.
 

twig21

Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
20
You all know what Tyrone Willingham is doing these days?
Sounds as though he is a unpaid asst coach for the girls Stanford golf team.
 

Kak7304

Well-known member
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
361
You all know what Tyrone Willingham is doing these days?
Sounds as though he is a unpaid asst coach for the girls Stanford golf team.

I think the new NCAA "death penalty" should be you have to hire Ty as your head coach for three years.
 

bigedefense

New member
Messages
734
Reaction score
109
I think the new NCAA "death penalty" should be you have to hire Ty as your head coach for three years.

So are you saying that a certain online site will soon be reporting that Ty will be taking Gene Chizik's place... HA! :clap:
 

Irish52

New member
Messages
554
Reaction score
22
Pray tell, what is it that Weis did for Notre Dame except walk off with $7M after being fired for incompetence and the most arrogant attitude during his entire tenure.
 

WabashFalcon

Team MVP
Messages
6,722
Reaction score
268
Pray tell, what is it that Weis did for Notre Dame except walk off with $7M after being fired for incompetence and the most arrogant attitude during his entire tenure.

Recruited like a mother and led the Irish to a BCS Bowl.
 

NeuteredDoomer

RIP - You are missed
Messages
6,714
Reaction score
434
Nice work IrishLax. I too thought TW was the reason ND was in such a big hole the last few years, and CW was fighting an uphill battle. He was very inconsistent at Stanford, and after his 8-0 start at ND, went 24-52 at ND and Wash. I thought ND caved into national pressure to hire him in the first place. 0-12 his last year at Wash. Now that takes talent to go winless.
 

Kak7304

Well-known member
Messages
2,068
Reaction score
361
Nice work IrishLax. I too thought TW was the reason ND was in such a big hole the last few years, and CW was fighting an uphill battle. He was very inconsistent at Stanford, and after his 8-0 start at ND, went 24-52 at ND and Wash. I thought ND caved into national pressure to hire him in the first place. 0-12 his last year at Wash. Now that takes talent to go winless.

Especially with Washington State on your schedule.
 

AlbuquerqueIrishFan

New member
Messages
1,074
Reaction score
27
Ty was an awful recruiter, but check out the guys in the NFL from the 2004 classs:
John Carlson (Seahawks), Ryan Harris (Broncos), Brady Quinn (Broncos), Tom Zibikowski (Ravens) and Jeff Samardzija would have clearly been selected to the leage had he not gone to play in the major leagues. Ty still sucked as a recruiter and coach.
 

footballinsiders

New member
Messages
171
Reaction score
1
I live in Seattle so I have seen Losingham destroy both of my favorite College Football teams. Willingham is a joke and I am still scratching my head why the Huskies hired him after Notre Dame saw the writing on the wall and fired him. While all the rest of the head coaches are out recruiting or game planning, Willingham would be out playing golf. Willingham lived off his one rose bowl year at Stanford with an 8-4 record. If an university decides to ever hire this guy to be the head coach they deserve to lose every game.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
Pray tell, what is it that Weis did for Notre Dame except walk off with $7M after being fired for incompetence and the most arrogant attitude during his entire tenure.

1) $7 million isn't really all that much, at Notre Dame. Or maybe $7 million is alot, anywhere. But it certainly didn't put ND behind any financial 8-balls or anything.

2) Weis brought a great work ethic with him. He was always the first one in, last one out, every day, according to anyone within the program who ever spoke publically about it.

3) Weis took ND to two BCS bowls, in his first two years.

4) I still don't get the accusations of arrogance about Weis. He was very confident in what he was doing, but I never saw the "arrogance" that so many people talk about as if it were an incontrovertible fact.
 
Top