TorontoGold
Mr. Dumb Moron
- Messages
- 7,345
- Reaction score
- 5,702
I never said a word about who should be paid the most. I don't know who makes what, but the fact of the matter is salaries go up anually, and it makes sense that Cig got a boatload. However, I take "someone who's won a title" to mean Dabo. Any AD who would give Dabo a mega-contract at this point should be executed immediately, or at least confined to an asylum.
If Sark or Lanning deserve more than Cig, it's mainly because perception matters a lot, and there are many people like you who see guys doing competent jobs at elite programs and value them higher than someone doing a legendary job at literally the worst power conference program of all time.
I-A Winning Percentage 1869-2023
As to, "are we really going to say "he deserves" more than Dabo/Sark/Lanning?" I apologize for reading that as an inquiry.
You said "he deserves every penny". Presumably you determining his "worthiness" of the money means you understand his salary relative to others, no?
Sark has won two playoff games and Lanning won the big 10. I'd say it's a bit more than perception. Winning on the biggest stages is typically what you get paid for, kind of like why you don't see those scrappy resourceful upstarts at the top.
I'd say a fair salary would be something around what Drinkwitz signed for in July 2025 at ~9M.
I'm pumped for the school that they're having success. They paid a hell of a premium to keep the vibez going and I hope it works out. But I get pretty weary of a guy building it essentially like a non-problematic Mel Tucker.
