Immigration

LifelongFan

Well-known member
Messages
1,599
Reaction score
1,914
What does that have to do with maimed children? Children maimed by US weapons? What would Jesus do with them?
 

LifelongFan

Well-known member
Messages
1,599
Reaction score
1,914
I think it's intense, and I think if you asked a Bosnian in the 90s about what should happen to Serbia or a Jew in the 1940s what should happen to the Axis, the answer would sound similar. He seems to express that he's a Palestinian and he's watching his people be victims of genocide. What would your reaction be if Americans were being slaughtered by bombs and snipers every day in the US by Chinese using Russian weapons?
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,575
Reaction score
20,023
I think it's intense, and I think if you asked a Bosnian in the 90s about what should happen to Serbia or a Jew in the 1940s what should happen to the Axis, the answer would sound similar. He seems to express that he's a Palestinian and he's watching his people be victims of genocide. What would your reaction be if Americans were being slaughtered by bombs and snipers every day in the US by Chinese using Russian weapons?
He didn’t ask for a combo meal of Toronto vortex and Kamala word salad.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,157
Don’t ask #1 on if he cares. The only good terrorist errr Muslim errrr Palestinian is a dead one.

Shocking. Toronto misrepresented someone else's position to make it easier to criticize. If only there was a phrase for that.

strawman-in-farm.jpg
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,157
You figure out how to use Google yet, or are we still confused? LOL
Don't dodge and try to change the subject. Address your inability to deal with anyone's actual position or argument, thus necessitating strawman arguments on the regular. Constantly relying on strawman arguments indicates a lack of intellectual honesty and ability.

15z6fg.jpg
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,346
Reaction score
5,703
Don't dodge and try to change the subject. Address your inability to deal with anyone's actual position or argument, thus necessitating strawman arguments on the regular. Constantly relying on strawman arguments indicates a lack of intellectual honesty and ability.

View attachment 3059717

lol you don't have an actual opinion, you can't post any thoughts that aren't just pixelated memes from some Karen's facebook group. When you have an original thought or a clearly stated position I'll be there to address it. For now, you'll continue to be the guy who can't use Google and the class punching bag lmao.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,157
lol you don't have an actual opinion, you can't post any thoughts that aren't just pixelated memes from some Karen's facebook group. When you have an original thought or a clearly stated position I'll be there to address it. For now, you'll continue to be the guy who can't use Google and the class punching bag lmao.
I see that you're scared to address the issue of how you constantly misrepresent anyone's opinion that you don't agree with, rewording it into something much different and weaker so that you can refute the weaker false version, then celebrate your "victory" - you know, strawman arguing. Everyone here knows you do it, and do it often. Is it a lack of character and intellectual integrity that causes you to think it's OK, or are you not smart enough to realize we all recognize when you do it, or are you just not intellectually capable of debating the actual positions and arguments of others? You tell us, if you dare.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,346
Reaction score
5,703
I see that you're scared to address the issue of how you constantly misrepresent anyone's opinion that you don't agree with, rewording it into something much different and weaker so that you can refute the weaker false version, then celebrate your "victory" - you know, strawman arguing. Everyone here knows you do it, and do it often. Is it a lack of character and intellectual integrity that causes you to think it's OK, or are you not smart enough to realize we all recognize when you do it, or are you just not intellectually capable of debating the actual positions and arguments of others? You tell us, if you dare.
What’s the “issue”? Can you explain what I am straw manning? If you think that me mentioning how you refuse to acknowledge you got duped by some Karen on Facebook for an incorrect DJIA chart is straw manning, I have plenty of examples of how you lack fundamental critical thinking skills. What makes you different than the rest is that they at least at a fundamental level understand they’re wrong and try to move on, you on the other hand lack the self awareness to know when you’ve got the “kick me” sign taped to your back.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,157
What’s the “issue”? Can you explain what I am straw manning? If you think that me mentioning how you refuse to acknowledge you got duped by some Karen on Facebook for an incorrect DJIA chart is straw manning, I have plenty of examples of how you lack fundamental critical thinking skills. What makes you different than the rest is that they at least at a fundamental level understand they’re wrong and try to move on, you on the other hand lack the self awareness to know when you’ve got the “kick me” sign taped to your back.
You're still trying to change the subject from your own dishonesty to some nonsense about me because you don't have the character or ability to debate anything without misrepresenting the other person's argument or position. I have no idea what you're rambling about concerning some FB Karen's post. Besides, it has nothing to do with the issue under discussion.

You consistently and intentionally misrepresent what others say or intend, and their arguments and their positions, so that you can more easily attempt to refute them. You do it over and over. It's a sign of a lack of character or integrity, or a sign of an inability to hold your own in a factual, reasonable debate. That's the definition of a strawman argument. You ignore their real point, create a false and weakened version of it, defeat the weakened version, then claim victory. That's you.

It's pathetic. It's intellectually weak. It's part of why I make fun of you for being weak. If you weren't weak, you'd own what we all see on an almost daily basis from you, realize why it's weak, and stop. But you won't. You'll dodge and spin and change the subject again and pretend you don't get it.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,346
Reaction score
5,703
Someone has entered the Bishop Vortex it appears.
It's more of a dust storm. Poor buddy can't even fumble together a coherent point. It's just a jumble of nonsense, kind of makes sense given his ability to use Google, or that fact that he got fooled by a fake story that's circulated since 2007 and has been routinely proven to be false.

I thought it was kind of funny seeing my grandparents lose grips on what was true or not because their friends sent them ridiculous emails that they forwarded, but to see the elderly actually post this in a public space is kind of sad. I can only imagine how many "Dad, please remove this, it's embarrassing us" they get sent.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,157
You're still trying to change the subject from your own dishonesty to some nonsense about me because you don't have the character or ability to debate anything without misrepresenting the other person's argument or position. I have no idea what you're rambling about concerning some FB Karen's post. Besides, it has nothing to do with the issue under discussion.

You consistently and intentionally misrepresent what others say or intend, and their arguments and their positions, so that you can more easily attempt to refute them. You do it over and over. It's a sign of a lack of character or integrity, or a sign of an inability to hold your own in a factual, reasonable debate. That's the definition of a strawman argument. You ignore their real point, create a false and weakened version of it, defeat the weakened version, then claim victory. That's you.

It's pathetic. It's intellectually weak. It's part of why I make fun of you for being weak. If you weren't weak, you'd own what we all see on an almost daily basis from you, realize why it's weak, and stop. But you won't. You'll dodge and spin and change the subject again and pretend you don't get it.

It's more of a dust storm. Poor buddy can't even fumble together a coherent point. It's just a jumble of nonsense, kind of makes sense given his ability to use Google, or that fact that he got fooled by a fake story that's circulated since 2007 and has been routinely proven to be false.

I thought it was kind of funny seeing my grandparents lose grips on what was true or not because their friends sent them ridiculous emails that they forwarded, but to see the elderly actually post this in a public space is kind of sad. I can only imagine how many "Dad, please remove this, it's embarrassing us" they get sent.
LOL! You just did exactly what I said you'd do!
 
Top