^some additional food-for-thought on DoE and higher education
Simply put, the wokest of woke academic positions are the ones furthest away from business and hard sciences. The most "normal" professors deal in things that involve math or real world applications. The growth of thought policing, DEI, and other nonsense is rooted in student loans. People who take out student loans for degrees with no career prospects are subsidizing DEI administrators and advanced degree programs in women's studies, gender studies, AA studies, sociology, etc.
If you take away student loans for worthless degrees or worthless schools, then what will happen is that the "demand" for these courses will drastically shrink. And once that starts happening, the "supply" of these cancerous higher academics will start to shrink. This is even more so true if you cut or limit federal research grants for things outside of science and engineering.
I studied educational economics in university and the degrees with the lowest ROI were the "non-professional" ones. I won't say social science because economics is a social science and I can't grapple with it being grouped in with gender studies lol. They still provided a positive ROI over not having one no matter if they entered into their field of study or not - ie. someone with a gender studies degree is still better off than someone without a degree.
I worked on a research project for a professor in developing a policy proposal for the government to remove funding entirely from post-secondary schools. Eliminate all subsidies provided from the province/feds and have these institutions operate as a business because if they're going to have special exemptions on taxes and endowments then they shouldn't also get gov funding.
We found very preliminary findings based on case studies around the world that this approach would more beneficial in long term development of the population only if the savings were re-invested back into the population through better elementary/high school resources. Basically - if you take the money saved and put it towards young kids it will go further and be more beneficial, you can't just take the money and blow it on more bombs or government pet projects.
Another key finding which is interesting (something the Cons on the board will like) is that subsidizing education will
not lead to more people going to university. The case study for this was Quebec as it is most heavily subsidized post-secondary province/state in NA and the enrollment stats lineup with other provinces. The conclusion found was that if you have subsidized education like some European countries the Gov needs to also provide guaranteed work for them on graduation so that they can pay back some of their degree costs and also earn a bit of money to help them start off.
All this to say - giving money to Colleges/Universities is the dumbest shit that neoliberalism has given us. The appearance of benevolence without doing anything good. The debt forgiveness is good policy for growing household debt but should only be down if there is a long term solution for tackling higher education.