Police State USA

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,156
I did look at the evidence. Watch the video. That guy was compliant and answering their questions. They ask him if he has anything on him so he starts to go through his pockets. Big bad pussy cop decides to rip him out of the vehicle and ends up shooting him. Throw that fucker in prison and lose the key.

I’m sure they’ll investigate and decide he did nothing wrong. Then people will continue to cry about how everyone hates cops. Gee I wonder why?
I've watched it. C'mon man, you know that's not how this went down. That cop didn't just rip him out of the car for no reason. He was very polite while questioning the guy, but we all know that guy acted weird and probably under the influence. He got jerked out of the car when he was going through his pockets and suddenly turned away and put something in his mouth... almost always indicating an attempt to get rid of drug evidence. I hate that it happened, and it could easily have been avoided, but that guy admitted he had a knife, resisted arrest, probably attempted to dispose of drug evidence, and didn't cooperate. At no point leading up to the shooting did the cop's behavior or words or tone of voice indicate a cop looking to abuse anyone. This whole "he was just sitting there doing nothing and a cop decided to shoot him" nonsense needs to stop. I hate actual police wrongdoing and abuse as much as anyone, but when you take situation where a guy is doing something wrong or resisting, and try to spin it as all someone else's fault, you're part of the problem.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,102
Reaction score
12,935
I've watched it. C'mon man, you know that's not how this went down. That cop didn't just rip him out of the car for no reason. He was very polite while questioning the guy, but we all know that guy acted weird and probably under the influence. He got jerked out of the car when he was going through his pockets and suddenly turned away and put something in his mouth... almost always indicating an attempt to get rid of drug evidence. I hate that it happened, and it could easily have been avoided, but that guy admitted he had a knife, resisted arrest, probably attempted to dispose of drug evidence, and didn't cooperate. At no point leading up to the shooting did the cop's behavior or words or tone of voice indicate a cop looking to abuse anyone. This whole "he was just sitting there doing nothing and a cop decided to shoot him" nonsense needs to stop. I hate actual police wrongdoing and abuse as much as anyone, but when you take situation where a guy is doing something wrong or resisting, and try to spin it as all someone else's fault, you're part of the problem.
If the cop doesn't escalate the situation and rip him out of the car no one dies. End of story.
 

irishtrooper

Well-known member
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
325
If the cop doesn't escalate the situation and rip him out of the car no one dies. End of story.
You are just wrong. I’ll agree it wasn’t perfect, however he was identifying the subject when he swallowed something and reached for something. He said he thought he had a knife. It’s completely justified to physically prevent the subject from continuing to obtain whatever his furtive movement could enable him to obtain.

You can call me whatever you want, but you’re still wrong. All courts, even in liberal states have upheld this action. You disagree, and it’s a free country. That doesn’t mean it’s not correct however. You calling me names because your preferred narrative is incorrect only serves to prove my point about people that push their agenda over any fact or evidence.

An awful result doesn’t always indicate malfeasance.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,156
If the cop doesn't escalate the situation and rip him out of the car no one dies. End of story.
The cop isn't the one who escalated this. Everything was fine until the guy pulled something from his pocket, turned away, and put it in his mouth.
 

irishtrooper

Well-known member
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
325
Just bad all the way around.
This is an oversimplification of a more nuanced discussion. The result is bad all the way around, not necessarily the response to the subject’s action. Perhaps waiting for some more neutral party (not the family attorney or the police agency alone) would be wise before conclusively stating the officer was wrong or “bad”.

Those who say “the cops will never charge a cop” are also ridiculous (not you, but this is a favored argument). Local prosecutors and SAGs (State Attorney General) have the decision to charge or not. The police turn over the footage and statements from the accused, witnesses/etc. They conduct their own investigation and determine whether to charge or present it to a grand jury for an indictment (or No Bill). In NY, the SAG actually performs a sort of “double jeopardy“ if you will where they can investigate AFTER a District Attorney decides not to file charges. DAs and SAGs are elected officials and they’re accountable to their constituents, not the police agency or even message boards.

I believe in accountability in policing more than many here would believe. In fact, just yesterday a Captain told me that I’m more strict in accountability than any other supervisor in his zone. I take pride in my tough parameters for acceptable performance and behavior. I REFUSE to change or alter those parameters to push a theme or narrative.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Are you serious?! You quote his family’s attorney (no bias I’m sure). I watched the video and since you clearly are foolish with regard to policing or laws that govern protecting yourself, let me offer the following-

The officer responds to a report of a subject getting in the wrong car in clear daylight (possibly indicating some sort of impairment). Definitely cause for some level of alert or concern.

He locates the subject and is greeted with disdain (no surprise this day in age - particularly when there are so many experts on tactics out there). Anti police sentiment is not only embraced by people like you, it’s encouraged by jumping to snap judgments without a full investigation (something every citizen- EVEN POLICE have a fundamental right to).

He is difficult to understand and offers a confusing account of why he’d get into the wrong car. While being id’d he states he might have a knife (whether you agree - all courts have held that is a deadly weapon, a deadly weapon with which you as a police officer have a right to defend yourself from with deadly force).

The subject reaches for something (knife?), puts something (drugs?) in his mouth, and this officer in a literal split second decides to physically engage. He doesn’t just shoot him, he tries to control him and handcuff him. The subject clearly physically resists and there’s a struggle. I can’t tell from a quick view, but the officer claims (reasonably) that he was grabbing his ”stuff” while motioning toward his firearm.

There will be a full investigation and if charges are merited, then the officer will likely be charged. It’s totally lawful and reasonable based on the initial review that this was probably justified. However if evidence is presented to the contrary, I’ll support full prosecution. NOBODY has more scrutiny on them than police, and for an armchair prosecutor to convict him based on a video that doesn’t show what he so badly wants it to show serves nobody, except for the anti police amongst the board.

I feel for the subject’s family and better communication would’ve likely prevented a loss of life. I don’t think the officer can just wait to see if the subject was grabbing for a knife. When the struggle began, grabbing for the firearm (if true) or just physically resisting after saying you have a knife (and don’t like cops), and swallowing possible evidence isn’t a good way to ensure personal safety.

I’m disappointed that the snap judgment here is to assume he was just killed while innocently waiting for his little brother. That’s clearly only part of the story. Perhaps adding that he was killed while waiting for his brother after saying that he might have a knife, swallowing something (typically drug evidence), reaching for something and fighting (resisting physical control to ensure safety) and allegedly grabbing the officer’s weapon wouldn’t be as inaccurate
There is a lot of possibly? Maybe? IDK guess work on the suspects actions. I guess the subject won’t get his day in court will he? He was executed.
 

irishtrooper

Well-known member
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
325
There is a lot of possibly? Maybe? IDK guess work on the suspects actions. I guess the subject won’t get his day in court will he? He was executed.
I agree, however some would like to judge it immediately without any answers. I concede it looks bad, particularly to those without more understanding of the actual laws that govern police encounters. I am certain I understand them quite a bit more than most here and this officer acted within the law based on the circumstances provable from a quick view of a video. The issue is the appearance, coupled with statements made by people pushing an agenda. I get there are bad situations that are not justified, but this doesn’t appear to be one. Facts and evidence matter and my feelings do not. Was it lawful? Was it illegal or criminal? Also, like in my state was it not criminal, but is the officer responsible on the civil side? Another option is to determine whether, even if technically legal, was it within that agency’s rules and regs (this one could admittedly be “worked” in some states, but mine has a law where all substantiated or founded complaints are public)?

There are several levels of accountability and it is more widely scrutinized than a regular citizen, as it should be in my view. I know many just HATE police, but that hate won’t change the facts.

I’m open to altering my opinion if evidence is presented to augment that side of the discussion.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,102
Reaction score
12,935
If the guy complies and doesn't resist he also doesn't die. Both can be true. He managed to bloody the officer's nose and while the video isn't clear it looks like he tried to grab the gun. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
I wonder why he’d resist? Being body slammed on your head while you’re trying to comply and take out the knife the office asked you if you had.

bUt hE mIgHt hAvE tAkEn a PiLl!!

Yeah that seems worthy of causing someone bodily harm over.
 

irishtrooper

Well-known member
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
325
I wonder why he’d resist? Being body slammed on your head while you’re trying to comply and take out the knife the office asked you if you had.

bUt hE mIgHt hAvE tAkEn a PiLl!!

Yeah that seems worthy of causing someone bodily harm over.
You’re intellectually dishonest In your absolute refusal to listen to an opinion different from yours. He was doing his job. He was called there. The guy was grabbed AFTER swallowing something (probably drug evidence) and AFTER he reached for something (after saying he had a knife). He resistEd AFTER and allegedly grabbed the office’s weapon AFTER and had the opportunity not do these things and he’d almost definitely be alive.

Your refusal to accept facts and only mention things that you laughably think prove your point makes you sound ridiculous. I’m done arguing with those who refuse to accept facts and instead jump to their conclusions based on their emotional response to a terrible situation. Enjoy living in foolish denial with those here who agree with your nonsense
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,102
Reaction score
12,935
You’re intellectually dishonest In your absolute refusal to listen to an opinion different from yours. He was doing his job. He was called there. The guy was grabbed AFTER swallowing something (probably drug evidence) and AFTER he reached for something (after saying he had a knife). He resistEd AFTER and allegedly grabbed the office’s weapon AFTER and had the opportunity not do these things and he’d almost definitely be alive.

Your refusal to accept facts and only mention things that you laughably think prove your point makes you sound ridiculous. I’m done arguing with those who refuse to accept facts and instead jump to their conclusions based on their emotional response to a terrible situation. Enjoy living in foolish denial with those here who agree with your nonsense
I believe he was reaching for the officers weapon as much as I believe he “jumped out of the vehicle” like they claimed. Lying ass pigs. Go on about your facts.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
This is why the "few bad apples" argument is trash and doesn't speak to the problem.

There will always be bad apples, the big problems arise when the good apples are justifying or excusing away the bad's terrible behaviour.
 

GoIrish41

Paterfamilius
Messages
9,929
Reaction score
2,119
You’re intellectually dishonest In your absolute refusal to listen to an opinion different from yours. He was doing his job. He was called there. The guy was grabbed AFTER swallowing something (probably drug evidence) and AFTER he reached for something (after saying he had a knife). He resistEd AFTER and allegedly grabbed the office’s weapon AFTER and had the opportunity not do these things and he’d almost definitely be alive.

Your refusal to accept facts and only mention things that you laughably think prove your point makes you sound ridiculous. I’m done arguing with those who refuse to accept facts and instead jump to their conclusions based on their emotional response to a terrible situation. Enjoy living in foolish denial with those here who agree with your nonsense
I’m not sure you are being very reasonable either. It was a weird use of brutality to inflict on a guy for disposing of drug evidence (a pill). You are refusing to acknowledge how f’ed up that is. Maybe the procedures are wrong and the cop follows them perfectly. But cops aren’t supposed to body slam people into the pavement unless they believe their life is in danger. That cop was out of line. His job is to deescalate the situation and he went WWE on a guy for taking a pill? I don’t know man. Seems excessive.
 
Last edited:

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018


So the proper chain of events for a speeding citation is that the cop alleges he caught you speeding and issues you a citation of which can be contested in front of a judge with the officer present… that’s it. There is no indication any other violation took place. Give the ticket and be gone..it’s not an open invitation to escalate and pepper spray someone non threatening in their own car.

I want to know why the door was open and why the cop felt like he could reach into the guys car and take his phone.
 
Last edited:

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,575
Reaction score
20,023


So the proper chain of events for a speeding citation is that the cop alleges he caught you speeding and issues you a citation of which can be contested in front of a judge with the officer present… that’s it. There is no indication any other violation took place. Give the ticket and be gone..it’s not an open invitation to escalate and pepper spray someone non threatening in their own car.

I want to know why the door was open and why the cop felt like he could reach into the guys car and take his phone.

The guys claims he was pulled over for going 50 in a 55. lol I'm not buying that. A policeman doesn't pull a speeder over for that. Wouldn't be surprised if the guy was on his phone while driving and going back and forth giving the indication that he was under the influence, thus the justification for pulling him over and wanting him to step out of the car. But hey! He doesn't have the entire incident on video, but we'll just go with his side of the story.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,575
Reaction score
20,023
Well, if he was trying to grab the gun, then yes...getting himself killed. Worst move you could make with any officer, short of carrying a gun yourself and reaching for it.
I got pulled over for speeding about 10 years ago. Gave the cop my license and registration. I realized I gave him the previous years registration, so I grabbed the current one hopped out and started to walk to his car to hand it to him. He stopped and told me to get back in my car. I immediately complied and got back in my car.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,156
I never cease to be amazed at the dishonesty in some of the descriptions of what happened or caused the conflict in some of these situations. "Cop threatens to pepper spray guy for going 60mph in a 55mph zone." No he didn't. He threatened to pepper spray the guy for refusing to comply with lawful instructions from the cop and step out of the car for a field sobriety test. The dude was going out of his way to be difficult and a smart ass. He was trying to provoke the officer.

"Some pig cop just body slammed him for taking a pill," as if he was just taking his 3pm blood pressure meds. He got jerked out of the vehicle for turning away from the cop and shoving something from his pocket into his mouth, which is virtually always an attempt to dispose of illegal drugs.

Stop with the dishonest, "Oh poor, poor innocent dude being harassed by the cops" nonsense. We're ALL against bad cops and want them weeded out of police forces and prosecuted when warranted, but when you intentionally misrepresent what happens in these situations, you're part of the problem, not the solution.
 

irishtrooper

Well-known member
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
325
I never cease to be amazed at the dishonesty in some of the descriptions of what happened or caused the conflict in some of these situations. "Cop threatens to pepper spray guy for going 60mph in a 55mph zone." No he didn't. He threatened to pepper spray the guy for refusing to comply with lawful instructions from the cop and step out of the car for a field sobriety test. The dude was going out of his way to be difficult and a smart ass. He was trying to provoke the officer.

"Some pig cop just body slammed him for taking a pill," as if he was just taking his 3pm blood pressure meds. He got jerked out of the vehicle for turning away from the cop and shoving something from his pocket into his mouth, which is virtually always an attempt to dispose of illegal drugs.

Stop with the dishonest, "Oh poor, poor innocent dude being harassed by the cops" nonsense. We're ALL against bad cops and want them weeded out of police forces and prosecuted when warranted, but when you intentionally misrepresent what happens in these situations, you're part of the problem, not the solution.
I’m glad there honest people out there still. Some try to use the final result and place it next to the original issue. It’s not that simple and any reasonable person understands that fact.

Yes shooting someone for waiting for his brother outside a school sounds terrible on the surface. Then it’s determined this subject got into the wrong vehicle, had a sort of discussion that would lead to a call to 911.

The subject decided where it goes from there in large part. “I don’t like cops” right off the bat indicates there may be some history that isn’t good with law enforcement. Then the subject (who later tested positive for meth btw) doesn’t provide much clarity with a rambling explanation

Next the officer questions presence of weapons. Subject offers he may have a knife (deadly weapon). Then when moving around the subject ingests something (a pill?). At this point the officer asks him what he put in his mouth. Then the subject reaches toward something, but away from the officer. I would hope the officer would obtain physical control to prevent getting to a weapon/etc. Also, the officer must protect the suspect from himself. Many times suspects ingest dangerous amounts of drugs in an attempt to evade arrest. Him trying to get whatever it was is his duty, whether you like it or not

Once the officer grabs the subject, can’t de-escalate at that point because the guy resists. The subject then decides the course of events generally from there. If he cooperates and is secured, everyone goes home (maybe jail). Nobody dies. Instead he clearly continues to resist and allegedly (I can’t tell easily) grabs the gun of the officer. This will get you killed almost every time.

The DA decided not to charge based on their investigation and reviewing facts of the incident. Hatred toward police doesn’t change that there was not evidence to support any charges.

Regarding the traffic stop, courts have held that a driver may be removed from a vehicle at a traffic stop. It is not an unreasonable search based on the constitution. There are many rules regarding searches that I don’t have the time to explain, but the officer can use force necessary to accomplish the driver stepping out of the vehicle. This guy is clearly trying to instigate based on the cropped clip posted. Many people would rather a temporary pain (OC spray) be used than going hands on and possibly hurting someone more permanently.

I suppose to many, the police are always wrong and it’s never ok to do their job. It’s not a pleasant job and there are many evil people out there who are preying on society and don’t just want to live a decent life. These people sometimes require force to be controlled or arrested. There are many rules governing these encounters and 99.9% of the time they are followed. I’m all for prosecution if they aren’t.

I look forward to the posting of “ few bad apples” from the select few here that aren’t fans of law enforcement. Those are exceptions and not the rule. There are so many examples I could cite, but it doesn’t matter because many of the minds here are made up and the name calling and insults will not stop.
 

irishtrooper

Well-known member
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
325
I got pulled over for speeding about 10 years ago. Gave the cop my license and registration. I realized I gave him the previous years registration, so I grabbed the current one hopped out and started to walk to his car to hand it to him. He stopped and told me to get back in my car. I immediately complied and got back in my car.
Yes, this would cause alarm for most police. It’s not personal, but they don’t know you and don’t feel comfortable with that situation. It’s also due to the fact that the officer has stopped you and if harm comes to you, get hit by a car/etc, that’s going to be a bad day for him (and the motorist)

Most people are just trying to be helpful, but like everything else a few bad examples cloud the risk assessment matrix. Better safe than sorry for all involved
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,102
Reaction score
12,935
I never cease to be amazed at the dishonesty in some of the descriptions of what happened or caused the conflict in some of these situations. "Cop threatens to pepper spray guy for going 60mph in a 55mph zone." No he didn't. He threatened to pepper spray the guy for refusing to comply with lawful instructions from the cop and step out of the car for a field sobriety test. The dude was going out of his way to be difficult and a smart ass. He was trying to provoke the officer.

"Some pig cop just body slammed him for taking a pill," as if he was just taking his 3pm blood pressure meds. He got jerked out of the vehicle for turning away from the cop and shoving something from his pocket into his mouth, which is virtually always an attempt to dispose of illegal drugs.

Stop with the dishonest, "Oh poor, poor innocent dude being harassed by the cops" nonsense. We're ALL against bad cops and want them weeded out of police forces and prosecuted when warranted, but when you intentionally misrepresent what happens in these situations, you're part of the problem, not the solution.
If you think either of these videos are examples of good police work, then no, I don’t think we’re ALL against bad cops.

I like how you continue to ignore the cops lie that the guy jumped out of the car at them. Surely they wouldn’t also lie about him reaching for their gun. 😱
 
Last edited:

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,575
Reaction score
20,023
If you think either of these videos are examples of good police work, then no, I don’t think we’re ALL against bad cops.

I like how you continue to ignore the cops lie that the guy jumped out of the car at them. Surely they wouldn’t also lie about him reaching for their gun. 😱

Thinking about this more, I wonder what really happened when the guy got in the wrong car that would cause the occupant to call the police?
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
6,156
If you think either of these videos are examples of good police work, then no, I don’t think we’re ALL against bad cops.

I like how you continue to ignore the cops lie that the guy jumped out of the car at them. Surely they wouldn’t also lie about him reaching for their gun. 😱
I think both videos are of police officers trying to do their job according to the law, and the other person acting like an idiot and escalating the situation and being a dumbass.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,102
Reaction score
12,935
I don't know what you're referring to. I assume a report they filed, but I haven't seen that. I've only watched the video and what happened.
Dave Lucero, who was a chief deputy at the time and is now the Pueblo County Sheriff, briefed reporters at the scene that day. Lucero told reporters that day that Ward "jumped out of the vehicle." The video shows Ward being pulled out of the car by a deputy.
Thin blue line baby!
 
Top