Dale
Well-known member
- Messages
- 16,120
- Reaction score
- 27,376
As far as what I want to see or to the first bolded. I don't think it requires stringing guys a long at all. I'm offering guys, recruiting them, and taking commitments from dudes that can play when their decisions come up. Doing so up to a larger number per position group if I feel that some of those prospects are still actively looking elsewhere or if we have a huge need for numbers. Each decision, position group, and recruitment requires nuance.
For example, the positional need for S's is far greater than that of TE's. Every position group wants talent. Some also need numbers. I've been saying for months that I'd recruit 6+ DB's this cycle because of last cycle and the Bowen recruitment. Same goes for OL. We've been recruiting the OL so well that I'd easily give up an OL spot for a 3rd DE to ensure that if Keeley bounces we got in on the guy we wanted and landed 2.
Not to be that guy but no hindsight here. I said the Dante Moore recruitment was unnecessary risk a long long time ago. Been talking about extra DB's literally the entire cycle. Finally we got 1. I wanted them to move on Mickens much earlier.
The perfect balance of pushing for elite recruits while making prudent roster management decisions is taking more prospects at the "at risk" position groups or with the "at risk" recruitments.
Like I said, nuance is needed but if we’re being honest, it hasn’t been the hard to spot. Do we really have to go into the differences between CJ Williams and Amorion Walker versus Jaylon Sneed? Or, Keon Keeley versus Traore?
Keon has been showing up on OSU flip articles for months. He’s been flirting with Bama since January. He’s one of two commits that are doing this. Meanwhile Adon Shuler has offers from UGA and Bama and hasn’t visited either. Not every good prospect is going to require this. And not every position group will require this.
This is all nice and tightened up with “nuance” but you’re judging these situations in hindsight still. The simplest answer is to look around and see what all the other elites do, every other elite program has decommitments/losses they aren’t 100% prepared for. It’d imagine there’s a reason for that. To employ the amount of backup recruiting asked you’d 1000% be stringing prospects along. No other way about it. You also just hit on QB, DE, CB and S as positions to shift priority to. We know WR belongs there too. People were freaked out about OL at times in Spring. That’s over half the position groups. All I’m saying otherwise we’re going in circles is it seems easy to say these things but I think this “nuance” is 100x more complicated and delicate and ever changing than given credit for.