WilliamWallace
Active Member,
- Messages
- 1,601
- Reaction score
- 749
GotchaYou have to click on the word "Here" in my post. The video isn't hosted on a site that'll auto-embed here.
GotchaYou have to click on the word "Here" in my post. The video isn't hosted on a site that'll auto-embed here.
The point at which we'll get involved military has been quite clear for many years. It's when a member of NATO gets attacked. We're not risking nuclear war for anything short of that.I dunno, I don’t think we can allow Russia to dictate what other sovereign nations can and can’t be part of. That’s kinda why we are here.
they all have guns now. When the Russians take over they're going to have to deal with that. A lot of Russians are going to get shot in the Ukraine over the next few years.The point at which we'll get involved military has been quite clear for many years. It's when a member of NATO gets attacked. We're not risking nuclear war for anything short of that.
Right now, we're doing all sorts of other things to hurt Russia and encourage Ukraine. But if the fight is unwinnable, is that really the right thing to do? Putin is intent on taking eastern Ukraine for a number of reasons. Regardless of what we think of those reasons, we aren't going to risk direct military action against Russia to stop him. So where does that leave us? And the Ukrainians?
True, but many more Ukrainian civilians will die thinking they can take on Russian armor with Molotov cocktails. And to the extent we've encouraged them to view themselves as the protagonists in a Marvel movie, we (or at least our media) may share some of the blame for their deaths.they all have guns now. When the Russians take over they're going to have to deal with that. A lot of Russians are going to get shot in the Ukraine over the next few years.
That was my second wife. The current Mrs. Wild Bill is a lovely lady. 4th times a charm boys!Funny because that's also Mrs. Wild Bill's nickname
The point at which we'll get involved military has been quite clear for many years. It's when a member of NATO gets attacked. We're not risking nuclear war for anything short of that.
Right now, we're doing all sorts of other things to hurt Russia and encourage Ukraine. But if the fight is unwinnable, is that really the right thing to do? Putin is intent on taking eastern Ukraine for a number of reasons. Regardless of what we think of those reasons, we aren't going to risk direct military action against Russia to stop him. So where does that leave us? And the Ukrainians?
Some people do find encountering contrary opinions to be very upsetting. If you'd prefer an echo chamber, there are lots of other options out there. But that's not IE.I dislike that we can’t use the ignore feature on staff members
Prefer the ignore feature extend to all users and you not act like the dictator of your own little siteSome people do find encountering contrary opinions to be very upsetting. If you'd prefer an echo chamber, there are lots of other options out there. But that's not IE.
We shoot first and ask questions later for any bad guy that doesn't have nukes. See the Taliban, Saddam, Gaddafi, etc. Can't bully a country that has strategic weapons though. Would be nice if we could just uninvent those.I understand that, I really do, and you aren’t wrong, but the constant cycle HAS to change at some point. We just can’t keep conceding to the dictator-of-the-month in Russia. They just don’t get to decide what another sovereign nation can do, we just can’t keep having that.
How am I acting like a dictator?Prefer the ignore feature extend to all users and you not act like the dictator of your own little site
We shoot first and ask questions later for any bad guy that doesn't have nukes. See the Taliban, Saddam, Gaddafi, etc. Can't bully a country that has strategic weapons though. Would be nice if we could just uninvent those.
Been sayin lolI dislike that we can’t use the ignore feature on staff members
The horror that would result from even a single nuclear strike far outweighs whatever is going to happen in Ukraine.or we make our stand now. I’m not sure I know what’s worse anymore, the constant sword of Damocles, or watching innocents get butchered because we have reasons to let it happen. Maybe it’s time to let the chips fall where they may…
The horror that would result from even a single nuclear strike far outweighs whatever is going to happen in Ukraine.
This is the world we live in.
I agree. I think the scary thing is the precedent this sets for Putin should he decide he wants some other country next, or China, or anybody really. It is a clear sign that as long as its not a Nato country, sovereign nations are fair game. It also puts us in a precarious situation the next time some country that we have a strong vested interest in is engaged in conflict. If they are not a Nato country, how do we protect our interests without sending a clear message that the lives of the people in country X are worth more than the Ukrainian lives were. Its a precarious predicament.The horror that would result from even a single nuclear strike far outweighs whatever is going to happen in Ukraine.
This is the world we live in.
In your view, what should NATO do to prevent Russia from hypothetically rolling over all non-NATO ex-Soviet states?The horror that would result from even a single nuclear strike far outweighs whatever is going to happen in Ukraine.
This is the world we live in.
In your view, what should NATO do to prevent Russia from hypothetically rolling over all non-NATO ex-Soviet states?
We shoot first and ask questions later for any bad guy that doesn't have nukes. See the Taliban, Saddam, Gaddafi, etc. Can't bully a country that has strategic weapons though. Would be nice if we could just uninvent those.
That fellow was pathetic. It was victim blaming 101. I love the reasoning that we should let Russia invade a nation because they told us they wanted to....ughhh, what? He says Ukrainians are indistinguishable from Russians....tell Ukrainians that. It would be really easy to show Ukrainians cheering for Russian intervention, if there were any.Here's a clip of Col. Doug MacGregor claiming that Putin has no interest in claiming anything west of the Dneiper, and would be happy to withdraw from it provided western Ukraine remains a neutral state. One of the first plausible explanations I've heard as to how this could deescalate back into a stable status quo.
Time to endure a severely heightened risk of nuclear war for a country like Ukraine? Nope.indeed. And it might be time to endure it.
Doesn’t really have anything to do with Urakine so much…. But thanks for following along closely. 👍Time to endure a severely heightened risk of nuclear war for a country like Ukraine? Nope.
I have no investment in MacGregor's credibility. Saw the clip on Twitter and shared it for the reason I stated--it gave a credible account of how this deescalates from the present crisis. Dismiss him as a Russian stooge if you want, but do share your alternative scenario: (1) Ukraine can't repel the Russian invasion; (2) NATO will not risk open war with a nuclear-armed Russia; (3) so where do we go from here?That fellow was pathetic. It was victim blaming 101. I love the reasoning that we should let Russia invade a nation because they told us they wanted to....ughhh, what? He says Ukrainians are indistinguishable from Russians....tell Ukrainians that. It would be really easy to show Ukrainians cheering for Russian intervention, if there were any.
One look at the guys wikipedia page and the guy was been on RT spouting pro-Russian talking points since they annexed Crimea. So of course Donald Trump wanted him to be the ambassador to Germany lolol
Sanctions and diplomacy. We've got some incredibly tempting carrots to offer in the way of shared prosperity, which is very effective in taking the fangs out of a regime (see OMM's point about China a few pages back). That might not be an option while Putin remains in power, but the oligarchs aren't going to put up with pariah status for long.In your view, what should NATO do to prevent Russia from hypothetically rolling over all non-NATO ex-Soviet states?
It has literally everything to do with Ukraine.Doesn’t really have anything to do with Urakine so much…. But thanks for following along closely. 👍