Agree. Need to pull him in. If he goes to FSU or ends up at SCUM this will have been a disaster.
Anyone know why FSU is a big player in this one?
according to loy he believes we are leading but not by much....in looking at other team sites on 247, steve lorenz from the michigan site said in sources he spoke to that are involved in his recruitment the top 3 he is highest on right now are Florida State, Wisconsin, Michigan...
When the low hanging fruit is a 6-1, 230lb legacy with a 117 Sparq as a junior that gives you flexibility to be standout on either sides of the ball, you make that a priority over guys who are your standard total ifs.
As much as I like Ty Chandler, he's just a better version Dexter and Deon at the same age.
AJ Dillon brings the Irish a physical skill set they do not have in house... a REAL big back that's also very athletic, not a 215lb Tony Jones who is being billed as one.
I agree Dillon adds to the power game, but his feet, agilty and and athleticism are a concern. I have always been a big fan of Dillon, but there isnt a huge difference between him and Tony Jones. Dillon's skill set isnt anything Jones doesnt being to the table.
I think Dillon is probably a little bit down on the pecking order at Notre Dame. That's not to say he isn't a good ball player, but he has limitations that about 5-6 other guys don't, who ND is in good shape with. If Notre Dame takes Dillon, I would imagine they would have to take a second RB in the class too.
If you can land a JK Dobbins, Ty Chandler, Trey Sermon, etc, then you don't have to take a second RB in the class, unless the plan is to move Dillon to LB, which is an entirely separate discussion.
back. Awesome.So what you are really saying is that we should prepare for Dillon to commit somewhere else, we then whiff on our top wants at RB and then have to take a 3back. Awesome.
ETA: and get nowhere near 85 scholarship players.
Measurables say otherwise by a significant margin. An FSU offer IMO backs up those numbers especially considering Jones didn't receive an offer and he was the featured back at the premiere HS showcase in the country... just down the road.
...and this is no knock on Tony Jones, I love that he's part of the program.
This is where I'm at. A lot of people say offer Ali-Walsh as well, but I'm not keen on that because I don't see one specific tool that stands out. Perfect program fit? Absolutely. When it comes to Dillon - I see a kid that can thrive between the tackles and push defensive players backwards when they try to tackle him. ND doesn't have that right now.
I am in the boat of offering Walsh, just not at this stage. Walsh can play RB, but also slot and impact the return game. However, there are other prospects better than Walsh.
I was in the boat of offering and throwing the sink at Dillon to commit until I really dug into the RB class. 2017 is extremely deep and Dillon is a fine player, but Notre Dame has a good shot with some elite backs.
As far as the 85 scholly limit, I am down, but it's a lot harder to sell another elite back on coming when Dillon is committed and four other backs are on the roster with 3+ years of eligibility remaining. The only way Dillon commits is if he is sold of not playing LB and telling another RB that Dillon could switch is entering murky waters.
But with that said, ND has to take another RB if they take Dillon.
I'm not a scout obviously but I think Tony Jones is a little better then Dillon despite the FSU offer. Jones is a little better laterally and really explodes accelerates through the hole quickly even though he doesnt have great top end speed. Dillon probably has better top end speed than Jones. I'd like to see Dillon against the talent Jones played at IMG because he is bouncing right off those Massachusetts kids.
I think you have to take Dillon. He's a terrific athlete who could play 4-3 OLB or RB.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/3WHjqozSda">pic.twitter.com/3WHjqozSda</a></p>— AJ Dillon™ (@ajdillon7) <a href="https://twitter.com/ajdillon7/status/710842863429492737">March 18, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>