So let me run something by you guys and see what you think:
I'm in the championship in one of my three leagues. I checked the matchup, and noticed that this guy had Golden Tate for the semifinals and for our finals matchup, and he hadn't had Tate all year. I went back and checked the transactions. The night that waiver requests were going to go through before the semifinals, one guy in our league dropped Tate at the last minute, and this guy had the highest waiver priority of everyone still active at the time, so he picked him up. I checked the other guy's roster, and Tate was his #2 WR. He could've dropped 4 other WR's but he decided to drop Tate?
Now, no one noticed it when it happened. My starting lineup has been pretty much locked in since week 13, and the free agent pool has been bad all year, so I didn't check the transactions. This guy ended up winning his semifinal by 6 points, and Tate scored 20.
I noticed the odd transaction, and questioned the guy who dropped Tate. He first said he was "drunk" and messing with his lineup and messed up. I thought it was bullshit, and realized they were probably colluding, but I let it go. Then the guy texted me and said, "he just asked me for David Johnson now." So he outed himself in that he had been asked to drop Tate and did it, but I guess the request for Johnson made him feel guilty, and/or he realized that I was now tracking the transaction wire closely.
First, he offered to drop Julio Jones for me to make it even. I refused, saying that I didn't want to create drama, and was going to let the Tate thing slide since no one noticed it (we all snoozed, we all lose). But then when the guy asked him for David Johnson, I got pissed and put him on blast in the league chat.
So, what is the standard procedure for this?
Our commissioner didn't disqualify him from his semifinal matchup despite the illegal transaction, because his next WR (Ted Ginn) actually scored more than Tate, so it wouldn't have mattered. But he told the guy that he can't use Tate in the finals.
Is our commissioner at fault for not locking rosters of teams that have been eliminated?
Should we let it fly since none of us checked the transactions closely enough?
This guy originally claimed innocence when I called him out on the Tate move, saying "I just saw the opportunity, you gotta check all available players every day man." He didn't know that I knew that he then asked for David Johnson for championship week, so his act of innocence realllllly pissed me off, so then I called him on his bullshit and let him know that I knew he was asking for more players, and that it wasn't just "opportunity" that got him Tate. How big of a douche is this guy?
How often does this shady stuff happen in fantasy leagues? Have any of you experienced something like this? I've never seen it before now.