Rhode Irish
Semi-retired
- Messages
- 7,057
- Reaction score
- 900
I was sincerely curious. I don't know of, haven't read, and haven't heard of, a single person that shares that view.
Did you read the Wells report? It's pretty clear that there were two different pressure gauges used to measure the footballs, and that those gauges were off from one another by as much as 0.4 PSI. Referee Walt Anderson said he remembered using the gauges in a sequence that would completely exonerate the Patriots, but he wasn't absolutely positive so the investigators concluded that he must have been mistaken and used the gauges in a sequence that would indicate deliberate tampering. It's also worth noting that one of the pressure gauges also showed that the Colts' footballs were also under the legal limit.
But not one person has bothered to respond to this.
Which part do you disagree with? The NFL leaked false info early which made Brady guilty from the start. They made no effort to correct the false media leak despite other instances when they've corrected the media. Hell, they even sent the Patriots false PSI info in their investigation letter and didn't correct that for months. The Wells Report cherry picks when to believe the referee and when not to to help fill the guilty narrative. They even ran a god damn sting operation. Not to mention that Goodell refused to let someone else hear Brady's appeal (which he has done in nearly every other case). Say what you want about the sketchy texts or Brady's phone, but the NFL has been far from the good guys throughout this entire thing.
I get the suspicions and people not trusting/liking the Patriots and Brady, but I figured more people would question the judgement of an authoritarian in Goodell who has shown he is incapable of handing down a single fair punishment in the past and who hired an "independent" investigator who cited client-attorney privilege to hide Deflategate correspondence for the Brady appeal.
I think what all this shows is that most people outside of New England do not care enough to pay close attention to what is going on, and so it is pretty easy to manipulate public sentiment with leaked false information and purposeful misdirection in public statements like what the League released yesterday. People in New England, on the other hand, have been hanging on all the actual details and following the endless pattern of leaked incriminating information and the subsequent discrediting of that leaked information (which is never covered as fully in the media as the initial leak, because what fun is that?). Obviously New Englanders are accused of being in the tank for Brady and being homers and being delusional about their team's guilt - and I'm sure on at least some level that is fair. But we are also the only people really invested in it and therefore generally have a much better command of all the relevant facts, and who the parties are and what their motivations might be.
I've likened it before to the ND situation with Manti or Declan Sullivan; the public narrative was one thing, and any attempts by ND fans to challenge that narrative were met with flat dismissals from everyone else on the basis that ND fans were obviously delusional. No thought was given to the idea that ND fans were following the details much more acutely than everyone else, who took two or three easy-to-condense soundbites or factoids and made the entirety of what they felt was required to understand the situation. Exactly the same thing here for Patriots fans. Exactly the same.