COACH D'S OPINION ON THE MATTER
COACH D'S OPINION ON THE MATTER
I'll answer it again, that's not a problem. Notre Dame was late to the party with too many recruits, even in regions where they have the same coach as before, so the whole "new coach" excuse can't be used. They are not as engaged with social media as they need to be (although to their credit they are beginning to improve in this area). They put too much emphasis on national recruiting at the expense of regional recruiting (outside of the OL). They have been late with offers. They show no awareness of the recruiting landscape of many prospects, leaving them late to answer challenges, late to make their push and late to get out offers. How many times have we seen ND either offer a kid right after he's committed, right after releasing a Top 10 without them in it and right before a kid commits somewhere else? This is always going to happen, but when its to the degree it has been with ND in this cycle, it shows they aren't where they need to be.
An example of an issue in the Midwest is the slow-playing of a guy like Khalid Kareem and then, months later, offering a guy like Tomon Fox. Fox is the same kind of player as Kareem, a SDE who is about power and not about speed. But while ND had a great shot at one point with Kareem, by the time they got on Fox he was flattered by the offer but still listed UNC and Tennessee as his top schools. Could they get him still? Maybe. But why not go harder after the kid from your backyard with an offer from Harvard? I get there are always extenuating circumstances, but this shows
Notre Dame is also consistently mentioned as a school that kids are interested in, which is great, but also as the school kids know the least about and often times the school many kids have the least amount of contact with. I'm all for the nationwide blitz in regards to evaluating players, but you can't see a kid, love on him in the moment, and then not follow up. That's happening far too often, and the reason is often a lack of organization in place to follow up. It doesn't always come from the coaches. That's also where the support staff can play a major role, but coaches also have to be more engaged. Seeing the nation is great, but spreading yourself too thin is not good. Also, I'm not someone who believes ND has to talk to a kid every single day. But with many kids it needs to be a lot more than what it is now. They also still need work with their tandem recruiting, which is better in some areas but not where it needs to be. That I expect to improve as the staff gets more used to each other. But we have heard way too many times about how Notre Dame is the school kids know the least about or hear the least from, despite ND having offered well before the time we hear those things. People want to dismiss that, but what fans think about a kid's recruitment doesn't matter, it only matters what the kids think. And this dismissive notion about only players who want attention or are me guys do that, bull. Knowing who you are playing for and trusting them is a big, big part of recruiting, whether you are a me guy or a team guy.
There are too many offers going out to defensive players who are situational guys.
There is way too much emphasis on seeing guys in person. It's great to do that, and with some players you need to do that. I'm all for the staff wanting to see some of these Plan B QB's throw in person. But far too many of these players they are waiting to see in person are guys that you know can play. This isn't like scouting for the NFL Draft, where guys can't make decisions before you see them and you know the end game for everyone. If you put too much emphasis on seeing guys in person and making personal offers you end up having what has been happening, they are way too late with too many players. If a guy is marginal, wait, don't offer a guy if there is doubt in your mind. But waiting to offer a guy so one coach can do it in person is fine if you know that guy loves ND, but unless that guy is already a lean or already favors you very much, get the offer out ASAP.
There is also a lack of consistency and cohesiveness. You have one guy getting an offer and then another guy, of equal talent not getting one. In some situations there are reasons, but for example, why does Paris Ford not have an offer yet? There is little reason why when everything we hear is that he is liked. This is going on in many instances, just no consistency. Also, the cohesiveness piece is key. You have assistant coaches telling guys offers are coming and giving timelines. "You should have an offer within a week," or something like that. It happens a lot. Then the offer doesn't come for over a month. Say what you want about how a 17 or 18-year old should respond to that, the reality is most won't respond well at all. If one coach promises a kid an offer is going to come soon, the coach responsible for okaying the offer should prioritize that kid's evaluation and make sure he backs his fellow assistants play. Otherwise, stop making those promises.
But this also plays into what I discussed before about not being aware of where a kid is and not being aware of what is being used against you. It is important that ND understand what their recruiting rivals are doing. Not just from a pitch standpoint, but from a push standpoint. You have to know what your competitors are doing, and that is where communication between the coaches and the support staff has to be highly on point. They aren't doing enough work to be on the same page and to have all the information they need in my opinion.
I've also talked before about the lack of visits with Midwestern kids. The number of times programs like OSU and MSU are getting kids on campus compared to ND is disappointing to say the least.
That's off the top of my head