How does the #1 WR (70 rec. - 1560 yds - 16 TD's) on the #2 team in the country, playing against a great Texas big school schedule only rate a 3 star? Film don't lie.
I don't care about ratings and where ND finishes as a team. In fact, if the Irish could land 20 "Jalen Guyton 3 star level" players every year... I'd be happy NEVER signing a 4 or 5 star player again.
Him and CJ Sanders are going to terrorize people when it's their turn to get on the field.
.
See: Cam McDaniel. He put up huge numbers and was the MVP of the hardest division in Texas football (if my memory serves me) and was only a 3 star. Still had a very productive college career, but we know he has limitations at the next level.
Guyton looks very polished and played well against tough competition. I think he'll be a very productive player for ND. That doesn't mean he can't ranked only as a 3 star at this point.
Behind the Scenes: Jalen Guyton – Part I
If you haven't already read it, Coach D at ISD posted a fantastic article about Jalen Guyton yesterday. It's the first of a two part series on Guyton's background and recruitment to Notre Dame. This first part focuses on his mother's perspective, and there will be a second focusing on his father's.
As the spectacle of NSD approaches, it's a refreshing look at an ND kid who shuns the limelight and instead embraces a humbler path to excellence.
We've been over this on this site many times. The fact that 50% of 5-star guys do end up getting drafted shows that the ratings mean a lot. After all, using the same concept, how many NFL 1st-round picks turn out to be busts? Certainly near half, if not more. But the odds of getting a good player in the 1st round is certainly higher than any other round, just like a 5* player is much more likely to be a big contributor at college level than high-3's.So what largely separates a high 3 stars from 4's and 4's from 5 stars is their ceiling, not their measurables or their performance against opponents. We're not just talking ceiling in how it relates to college but the pros. I just saw half of 5 stars going back to 2002 went undrafted. So Simmons and his ilk are basically spin doctors selling there pseudo science as there are hard numbers to prove their industry is a sham. It exists only to hype college football and provide clicks for the media.
I'm fine with that. But lets just call it what it is.
As per Mr. Guyton, I'm thrilled to have a 3 star, "system receiver" like him in South Bend.
McKinney ended up getting MVP
Ugh, rub it in why don't you!McKinney ended up getting MVP
I don't know why so many people here cling to the hope that a recruit will grow in height when he steps on campus. Most adolescent males stop growing in height at age 16. Unless the kid is ridiculously young for his class it's always best to subtract 1 to 2 inches off his listed height.
Really? I thought that was of females. And I was under the impression that 18 was normal for males. My two oldest boys continued to grow till they were 25; got that from their maternal grandfather. I didn't believe him till I saw it with my kids.
Height isn't the big thing about growth. Brollic is! There is a physical maturity that comes after 18 which has a lot to do with a kids ceiling. I suspect that is why some five stars never develop, and some three stars (see Tyler Eifert) explode through the roof.
I personally don't care about height, per se. But if you take this kind of receiver, and add an inch or two, so you can add twenty or thirty pounds, that is a good thing!
I don't know why so many people here cling to the hope that a recruit will grow in height when he steps on campus. Most adolescent males stop growing in height at age 16. Unless the kid is ridiculously young for his class it's always best to subtract 1 to 2 inches off his listed height.