Phyllis is unreal. First time I've ever actually listened to one of her calls. Literally sounds like a satire redneck from South Park or something.
Phyllis is unreal. First time I've ever actually listened to one of her calls. Literally sounds like a satire redneck from South Park or something.
Is she the Cow-turd lady?
Wait is this scripted?
I've never heard anything like this.
Wait is this scripted?
I've never heard anything like this.
Welcome to football in the south.
Tammy? No. These are real people. And they have no idea how they appear to the rest of this country... such a bad look lol
The whole Finebaum staring at me through the TV thing is creeping me out too. Dan Patrick >>>>>
That sh*t is funny.Got it. Also went on an epic rant vs. Danny Kannell.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/UEONAx_lOzA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Eh? Read much? Your statement is completely false, LOL.
I debated responding to you based on the fact you didn't read any of the stats I posted. Are you worth the time or not? Hmm..
Before I decide if I care, I request you read post #183 in this thread, read through the information I provided, then come back and respond.
Once you retract your false statement, we can talk about it. Otherwise, PUNT.
Post #612 by Woneone discusses a three year stretch between 2007 and 2009.
NCAA Playoff Committee Rankings 2014 (Unranked)
I remember was a larger history of SEC play against OOC opponents posted this year, but I cannot find the thread. It may be reflected in my search abilities, which I don't tend to do much here.
I personally did a 10-year review of OOC schedules (including bowl results) for the Top 8 or 10 teams in the SEC this year to confirm the results. I didn't post the results (was done on a lark), but what I found was that outside of a year or two of dominant performances, the SEC's record against OOC foes was pretty average. The trends were that a few top teams were dominant (Auburn, LSU, or Alabama typically) in a given year, but beyond that the SEC was over-hyped. Also, the last few years has been more brutal to the SEC showing that the other conferences are slowly catching up to them in recruiting and on-field play. The SEC 'mystique' was based largely in history, but not in the last few years especially.
Here is a study by Harvard math on conference and program bias, which is illuminating.
Conference Bias in College Football | The Harvard College Sports Analysis Collective
First, it shows the SEC gets the most benefit from bias in the rankings. Second, it shows that premier programs (like ND and Alabama) also get ranking bias. This reflects the disgruntlement that fans outside of ND have for our program in years where we play in a big bowl and get plastered, which has some statistical evidence against our favor. This is true of most of the premier college football programs and shows what I expect is the normal human bias towards traditionally good power programs.
The thread quoted above also discussed the Sagarin 'computer' ratings and why they are flawed: they depend on rankings which are entirely a human creation in a college football world with no scheduling parity. In other words, those computer rankings that supported the BCS system are heavily flawed toward the same bias shown in the Harvard study.
But, as always, do your own research to confirm.
They did better than everyone else, but are not dominant as people make them out to be.
That sh*t is funny.
only a snifter? you OK, D? or some sort of sick new year's resolution?
You'll like this one. I love when guys come on Finebaum and dont know what to expect out of these morons.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/t65VH5Iwd-U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The fact that this guy was allowed to accuse Tim Brando of smoking crack and then continue talking is ridiculous.
It's basically a no rules WWE match every day on the phone lines.
Yeah WEEI in Boston won't let you on the air for more than five seconds if you're gonna act a fool, but that's the entire purpose of Finebaum.
That's so completely different than what I'm used to. I honestly can't stop watching out of pure shock.
I wonder if Arkansas will continued to be touted as better than the Big 12/B1G/ACC champions for managing to go to 2-6 in conference and finish in last place in their division?
Here is simple graphic showing overall the SEC doing well over the last 10 years.
SEC dominant over past decade against Power 5 conference competition
![]()
They did better than everyone else, but are not dominant as people make them out to be.
Wait is this scripted?
I've never heard anything like this.
Yeah but that narrative was propped up on the basis of the SECw being essentially the 9th NFL division. Now that particular narrative has been popped over the past 96 hours. It was tiring to hear how Arkansas would run roughshod over conference champions, OSU in particular.Arkansas is different than most teams with their record. They were truly bad the first half of the season, but a genuinely good team the second half (as opposed to a team that was just mediocre all season long).
I get to listen to any number of these real life jack wagons all week during football season. Honestly, any of the callers to Finebaums show might as well be my coworker or a family member.
I don't listen to Finebaum because I get to talk to these people daily.