phork
Raining On Your Parade
- Messages
- 9,863
- Reaction score
- 1,019
This post is depressing....I disagree with all of it...Kelly walked into a qb nightmare and that is finally over.
USC has done nothing with all of their star power....
QB nightmare that is still going on. As for USC well, Kiffin sucked. Pete did just fine. Several beatdowns handed to ND.
Dude we have said this since 2011 that "X year is our year." Respectfully, this season is our season.
No its next year. NDs predicted comeback year can be solved by this equation:
NDsYear=(CurrentYear+1)
I'm not saying play for 2015 or that's "our year" I'm just talking about judging Kelly's ability to challenge for the top. There is lots of talent on this roster but there will also be some unusual challenges (also including an entirely new defensive scheme) that I'm not figuratively defenstrating Kelly if the Irish go 9-3.
Right, exactly. Its always something. QB, suspensions, new defense, etc etc.
Ahh... yes, because you think we didn't belong translates to "it didn't actually happen".
It sounds stupid when you say its impossible for us to do something we just did because it was a "fluke".
Step off of the ledge, dude. We lost a recruiting battle, it happens every year. We've been recruiting on an elite level since BK showed up.
What did we do? We backed into a NC game that any number of other teams that year would have fared better. I'm not on any ledge dood. My outlook is realistic. So there is my point again. We've been recruiting elitely since BK has been here. And in year 5, where are we? By most accounts, so far, in this post, most expect this schedule to murder us. Are you happy with another 8-5 campaign with all this elite talent?
I would agree that it would be difficult, given our restrictions, to consistently compete for titles, i.e., bama. I just can't go as far as saying we'll never compete for titles. Kelly has recruited the talent to be a consistently competitive team (top 15). Catch a few breaks, develop talent and lock down one or two five stars each year and we'll make the playoffs a few times a decade.
I like competitive. I'm not sure 8-5 is that.
So a coach can't be evaluated until his sixth season?
Only at ND.
I have already concluded he is a good coach.
If you're taking it a step further and talking about whether he can ever put together a team which is genuinely the best in CFB then I think judgment should be withheld until he has had time to fill the roster with his guys and circumstances are favorable.
Its year 5, this roster is his. What is your definition of "favorable" circumstances.
Kelly has a 71% winning percentage since his time at ND. That equates to 9.25 wins per year. I think the real number is 10 wins per year. If he can consistently do that it'll be considered a huge success. So he is just short of that number and doing so against an extremely tough schedule.
He'll be regarded as a succes. And a good coach. Never a great coach. John Cooper had similar success, but always lost to Michigan. He is a footnote in the books of CFB history.
ND's restrictions are nothing. Win and ALL the big recruits will come. the talent level is on campus now. Win 10-11+ games for a few years-which is extremely doable-and ND shows some stability with winning - all will be okay.
Talent-ND has it
Facilities-ND has it
Coach-ND has it
History/Lore/Fans-ND has it
Name Recognition-ND has it
Education-ND has it
Contacts after graduation-ND has it
Wins-working on it. plan is in place and ND is moving in that direction.
Fbolt, that again is my point. ND will not win 10-11 games a year to make your idea a reality. Therefore, not getting the guys ND actually needs to succeed. Rather, get the guys needed to push them over the top. Its a self fulfilling prophecy.